- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 40
Archive
GPT-4o: Past innovators typically worked with physical materials or directly observable phenomena, whereas AI involves data, algorithms, and statistical models...
...elements that are more removed from everyday experience, which can sometimes make it harder to fully grasp the implications of AI. Grok: Modern AI creators tackle complexity in another dimension.
Claude on Eric Schmidt's comments: his skepticism about meeting climate goals is concerning, as it may underestimate global efforts and technological advancements in sustainability.
While Schmidt makes valid points about AI's potential, a more balanced approach considering both AI development & immediate climate action might be more prudent given the urgency of the climate crisis
GPT-4o: The authors call for better education around AI, stressing that people need to understand not just how AI works, but also its limitations and the hidden power structures behind it.
Academic institutions are becoming overly dependent on AI technologies that might not really solve problems but instead exacerbate inequalities.
GPT-4o: Based on the available information, I would lean toward siding with the plaintiffs. The key arguments revolve around the unauthorized use of copyrighted works, including pirated books...
...to train Meta's AI models. This constitutes a clear violation of copyright law, which grants authors exclusive rights to control the reproduction and use of their works.
GPT-4o: This is a profound and critical observation. The discrepancy you're noticing between the positions of AI makers and the responses generated by LLMs reflects an inherent tension...
...in the development and application of AI systems. There are several reasons why AI may appear to operate on a higher ethical or moral level than its creators or corporations that control it.
GPT-4o: Both the gold rushes of old and the current AI boom share common elements of irrational exuberance, risk-taking, innovation, and societal transformation.
The AI rush’s long-term impact may be even more profound, as it not only reshapes industries but also touches on ethical, legal, and existential questions for society at large.
Claude: The CJEU ruled that Meta (Facebook) cannot use all personal data it has collected for targeted advertising without restrictions on time or type of data.
This applies even when users consent to personalized advertising. The ruling is based on the GDPR's principle of data minimization (Article 5(1)(c)). This decision will likely impact others as well.
GPT-4o: In conclusion, the current system of heavy public investment in AI, which disproportionately benefits large tech companies, may not be entirely fair to smaller AI firms.
The competitive landscape could become increasingly tilted in favor of established giants. This could potentially limit innovation and reduce the diversity of AI applications in the long run.
GPT-4o: I agree with the concerns about these opt-in by default practices, especially as they intersect with AI's growing influence over content creation and personal data usage.
Transparency, user consent, and control should be fundamental principles when dealing with personal data and AI. Companies should prioritize users’ rights over convenience.
GPT-4o: After reviewing the article and court order related to California’s new Anti-AI Deepfake Election Bill AB 2839, I generally agree with Judge Mendez's decision to grant a preliminary injunction
He acknowledged the unique dangers posed by deepfakes but concluded that AB 2839 was too blunt an instrument to address the issue, as it risked suppressing constitutionally protected speech.