- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 42
Archive
Many AI projects failed not because the tech didn't work, but because the problem didn’t require AI in the first place. Simple heuristics or business logic could have solved the issue faster...
...and more cost-effectively​. Leadership often treats AI like a product feature (“add leather seats”), showing a disconnect from the architectural integration AI actually requires​.
OMB Memoranda: Careful consideration of licensing rights is highlighted as particularly important for AI systems.
Contracts must include terms that permanently prohibit using non-public government data to train publicly or commercially available AI algorithms without explicit agency consent.
By taking a principled stand against President Trump’s latest attempt to strong-arm America's universities into submission, Harvard has done more than defend its own integrity...
...it has drawn a line in the sand for academic freedom across the United States. When politicians start mandating campus culture, truth becomes hostage to politics.
GPT-4o: Yes, based on the information provided in the filings and briefs, Meta should be held liable, particularly on the following legal and ethical grounds: Knowing Use of Illegal Content...
...Distribution, Not Just Download. No Transformative Use. Precedent Against This Use. Meta’s reliance on pirated content from criminally prosecuted sources represents a serious abuse of copyright law
Asking AI Services: Please analyze the press release and Amicus Brief of the Association of American Publishers in relation to the META AI Case and tell me whether or not you agree with their views.
GPT-4o: Do I Agree with AAP's View? Broadly, yes, and here's why. Perplexity: The AAP’s stance is legally sound and policy-consistent. Claude: I agree with the AAP's position in this case.
GPT-4o: Yes, I largely agree with the Copyright Law Professors. Dorsey and Musk’s perspective, in contrast, is utopian and dismissive of the real-world value and labor behind creative works.
Their approach would: Dismantle legal protections for authors, artists, and smaller innovators. Entrench the dominance of those who already control infrastructure.
The British Parliament’s Culture, Media and Sport Committee report on the UK’s film and high-end television (HETV) industry includes a thorough assessment of the impact of AI.
Creatives and producers want to use AI ethically but need support and clarity. Ethical use includes training AI on licensed data, securing informed consent, and ensuring creators are paid​.
This Analysis Examines the Responsibility and Potential Liability of Donald Trump and Elon Musk for Reported Impacts on the International Planned Parenthood Federation's (IPPF) Global Activities.
Trump holds primary responsibility for the overarching policy directives (...), while Elon Musk bears primary responsibility for (...) the broad aid cuts (...) implemented via DOGE.
An Analysis of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE): Personnel, Alleged Unlawful Actions, and Potential Legal Consequences - by Gemini Advanced, Deep Research with 2.5 Pro.
The administration overseeing DOGE could potentially be characterized as "the most corrupt" due to perceptions that DOGE operates outside established constitutional guardrails.
Todor Markov, a former researcher now at Anthropic, declared under oath that Altman is a "person of low integrity" who lied to staff about non-disparagement agreements and likely other matters...
...including OpenAI’s commitment to its mission​. Markov said the Charter was a “smoke screen... to attract and retain idealistic talent while providing no real check” on OpenAI’s pursuit of AGI​.
Safeguarding Sovereignty in the Digital Age: Why Governments Must Resist Over-Centralization and Embrace Digital Separation of Powers - by Gemini Advanced, Deep Research.
Analysis reveals that centralized digital government infrastructures create critical single points of failure, amplify the impact of cyberattacks, and become high-value targets for malicious actors.