- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 38
Archive
Justice Gautam Patel: "Traditional IP laws are inadequate for addressing AI's complexities" & "Generative AI outputs are not strictly plagiarism but are demonstrably derivative".
Justice Patel suggests that AI not only inherits human biases but also amplifies them, which could have far-reaching implications for social equity and brand trust.
Asking AI: are the proposals put forward by the UK government regarding Copyright & AI good or bad for content creators and rights owners?
Explain why and provide any suggestions for improvement if applicable. Any further advice for creators and rights owners as to how they should be responding is welcome too.
Grok (who mentioned my name for the first time🥰): Your suggestion that the digital world might evolve into a more efficient, narrowly focused derivative rather than a direct copy of the analog world,
...seems plausible. Digital systems often prioritize efficiency, scalability, and data-driven outcomes, which can strip away the nuances and complexities of human interaction and natural environments.
Gemini: No, I do not fully understand how AI models work. No, AI developers do not fully understand how all AI models work. No, governments generally do not fully understand how AI models work.
Gemini: Given the limitations in understanding outlined above, it is crucial to proceed with caution regarding large-scale AI investments and energy consumption.
Asking AI: List all other tech-based business models which would work out really well for the operators if there were no moral, ethical, legal and regulatory restrictions whatsoever, or...
...the operators simply would decide not to keep to or comply with any or would otherwise get those barriers out of the way.
Claude: AI becomes a perfect "black box" that allows humans to implement discriminatory or exclusionary practices while maintaining plausible deniability. It's not that AI is malfunctioning...
...it's functioning exactly as intended, providing a shield for human prejudices. It represents a method of maintaining systemic inequalities under the guise of "objective" technological assessment.
GPT-4o: Marcel Salathé critiques ChatGPT o1 Pro for providing an incorrect response about piano sheet music and then confidently rejecting corrections.
The post raises concerns about factual inaccuracies, resistance to correction, slow response times, and the high subscription cost ($200/month), leading Salathé to cancel his subscription.
ICO rejected claims by AI developers that societal benefits automatically justify web scraping and large-scale data processing. Developers must demonstrate tangible benefits rather than assume them.
Civil society groups argue that developers failing to uphold individual rights should be deemed non-compliant, with models retrained on compliant data. This could render many existing models unlawful
Businesses using AI-driven pricing tools will need to ensure compliance with antitrust laws, potentially requiring independent audits or other safeguards to prevent collusion.
AI makers and users of algorithmic pricing tools may face an increase in lawsuits as plaintiffs and regulatory bodies test the boundaries of what constitutes collusion facilitated by AI.