- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 164
Archive
Asking AI: Is it technically and theoretically possible that you either lie or hallucinate about the source materials you use for a response to a prompt? What are the consequences for researchers?
Bard: Yes, it is technically and theoretically possible for me to lie or hallucinate about the source materials I use for a response to a prompt, even if the actual source is part of my training data
Asking ChatGPT-4: Which tasks would you consider as completely new or significantly different from your training data and as a result would likely cause you to not perform well?
Specialized Knowledge, Personal Experiences, Real-Time Info, Physical Interactions, Works Based on New Trends, Human Relations, Highly Interactive Tasks, Predicting the Future, Original Research
The FTC highlights the concerns of creative professionals regarding the use of their work without consent to train AI, the harm from scraping content without consent, and the potential chilling effect
The FTC expresses concerns about the manner in which companies are developing and releasing AI tools, highlighting potential harm (...) privacy violations, discrimination, and deceptive practices
Double Dipping or Double Trouble? How Technology Companies Profit from Creating and Solving Problems - by Bing Chat
Bard: It is a well-written and informative piece that explores the complex and controversial phenomenon of technology companies causing problems and then offering solutions to those problems
ChatGPT-4's analysis of the Plaintiffs vs META lawsuit which includes multiple U.S. states accusing Meta of engaging in deceptive and unlawful conduct. What does this mean for AI makers?
Allegations: Meta knowingly engaged in practices that exploited vulnerabilities, especially in young users, for profit while misrepresenting and concealing the true nature and impact of its platforms
ChatGPT: "While ChatGPT does not have personal opinions or views, its responses can be perceived as such when it relays the consensus or common practices from various fields without clear attribution"
ChatGPT-4: The AI's responses can inadvertently reflect the views of the fields or data it draws from. The AI's language may inadvertently adopt the tone of the sources it relies on
ChatGPT-4's analysis of AAP's and Wiley's submissions to the US Copyright Office regarding Artificial Intelligence
GPT-4: Consequences they outline are supported by historical precedents and ongoing discussions in the field of AI ethics and copyright law. Here are some ideal strategies for AI makers and regulators











