• Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
  • Posts
  • Lobbying Activities by AI Makers: 'Terraforming' the Digital Landscape - by ChatGPT-4

Lobbying Activities by AI Makers: 'Terraforming' the Digital Landscape - by ChatGPT-4

In the U.S., OpenSecrets reported that entities lobbying on AI issues spent approximately $94 million in the first quarter of 2023

Lobbying Activities by AI Makers: 'Terraforming' the Digital Landscape by ChatGPT-4

In the burgeoning world of artificial intelligence (AI), the landscape is not only digital but also political. As AI makers endeavor to shape the regulatory framework that will underpin the future of technology, their lobbying activities represent a form of 'terraforming' the digital landscape. This article delves into the ethical concerns, democratic dangers, and potential consequences of these activities, particularly in light of problematic financial transactions that threaten to upend the balance of power between corporations and policymakers.

The Surge in Lobbying Expenditures

AI corporations are investing heavily in lobbying efforts. In the U.S., OpenSecrets reported that entities lobbying on AI issues spent approximately $94 million in the first quarter of 2023. Big Tech companies like Alphabet, Meta, and Microsoft are at the forefront, seeking to set preemptive rules. In the EU, tech companies are spending over €113 million annually to influence digital policy, responding to critical legislation like the Digital Markets Act and the new AI rulebook​​​​​​.

Terraforming the Digital Policy Landscape

AI makers are not passive players; they are actively sculpting the legislative framework. OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman, for example, has been touring world capitals, engaging with policymakers and the public to influence AI policy globally​​.

Ethical Implications

The ethical implications of this lobbying are profound, with concerns that the financial clout of AI giants may overshadow the interests of smaller entities, creators, and rights owners, potentially stifling innovation and fairness​​. The 'terraforming' efforts by AI companies are laden with ethical dilemmas. The potential for democratic processes to be undermined by financial influence is palpable, with large corporations wielding disproportionate power in shaping legislation like the Artificial Intelligence Act. Such influence could lead to legislation that favors the interests of the wealthy over the common good, threatening the foundation of democratic governance.

Dangers to Democracy and Responsible AI

The intense lobbying by AI makers poses dangers to democracy and the responsible development of AI. The influence of money on policy-making risks leading to legislation that may not adequately safeguard against bias, misinformation, and privacy invasion​​.

Possible Consequences for Creators and Rights Owners

The potential consequences for creators and rights owners in an environment shaped by the lobbying of AI companies could be significant. With the possibility of exploiting intellectual property without adequate compensation or recognition, the balance of power may tip unfavorably against individual creators​​. Creators and content owners stand at a precarious edge, as the voices of individuals and smaller entities may be lost amidst the clamor of AI giants. The risk that AI technologies could operate with minimal constraints, potentially exploiting intellectual property, looms large. This could set a precedent where financial power trumps creative rights, stifling innovation and equity in the digital realm.

Examples of Problematic Financial Transactions

These concerns are underscored by examples of problematic financial transactions:

  1. Strategic Engagements in Washington: OpenAI's indirect lobbying through law firms like DLA Piper and Latham & Watkins for coaching and legal representation hints at a sophisticated approach to influencing policy without direct lobbying disclosures.

  2. Political Contributions and Access: Sam Altman’s $200,000 contribution to President Joe Biden’s joint fundraising committee was quickly followed by his participation in a meeting with Biden and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and an invitation to the state dinner honoring Modi, raising concerns about the influence of financial contributions on political access.

  3. Influence of Big Donors: LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, an AI investor who has sat on OpenAI’s board, has given more than $700,000 to Biden’s joint fundraising committee and has publicly praised the administration’s recent AI executive order. Reid Hoffman's substantial donations, coupled with his support for the administration’s AI policies, exemplify how financial support can be entwined with policy advocacy. Top Microsoft employees have also given tens of thousands of dollars to Biden’s joint fundraising committee.

  4. European Lobbying Efforts: In the EU, Google and Meta’s multi-million euro lobbying investments, especially in the context of pivotal legislation like the DMA and DSA, underscore the extent to which financial clout could potentially sway policy outcomes.

“I’m very concerned that AI active executives are trying to cultivate Democrats now just like Big Tech cultivated Democrats a decade or two ago, and Wall Street did a decade before that,” said Jeff Hauser, founder of the Revolving Door Project. “AI knows that decisions in Washington that are made in the next few years will set the course of the industry for a generation. It’s a really good time to invest four-, five-, six-, maybe even seven-digits worth of campaign cash and potentially yield 10- or 11-digit returns.”

In Search of Balance

As we venture deeper into the AI era, the need for balanced AI policy becomes increasingly critical. A balanced approach must consider the interests of all stakeholders, ensuring that the digital landscape remains a fertile ground for innovation, fairness, and democracy. The lobbying activities by AI makers are a call to action for policymakers, industry leaders, and the public to engage in responsible discourse that prioritizes ethical considerations and upholds democratic values. As the digital landscape continues to be 'terraformed' by AI companies and as AI evolves, so too should our frameworks for its governance, ensuring that innovation, fairness, and democracy remain central to the digital future.

Sources:

  1. Politico: "AI policy yields a goldmine for lobbyists" - Link

  2. OpenSecrets: "Big Tech lobbying on AI regulation" - Link

  3. The Guardian: "Lobbying fears as MPs interest groups receive £13m from private firms" - Link

  4. Euronews: "Tech companies spend more than €100 million a year on EU lobbying" - Link

  5. TIME: "Exclusive: OpenAI Lobbied the E.U. to Water Down AI Regulation" - Link

  6. Corporate Europe Observatory: "Big Tech takes EU lobby spending to an all time high" - Link

  7. The Internet Patrol: "The AI Lobbying Surge: Big Tech Companies Race to Influence AI Regulations Amid ChatGPT Boom" - Link

Photo by Amira Aboalnaga on Unsplash