- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 53
Archive
ChatGPT: "While ChatGPT does not have personal opinions or views, its responses can be perceived as such when it relays the consensus or common practices from various fields without clear attribution"
ChatGPT-4: The AI's responses can inadvertently reflect the views of the fields or data it draws from. The AI's language may inadvertently adopt the tone of the sources it relies on
ChatGPT-4's analysis of AAP's and Wiley's submissions to the US Copyright Office regarding Artificial Intelligence
GPT-4: Consequences they outline are supported by historical precedents and ongoing discussions in the field of AI ethics and copyright law. Here are some ideal strategies for AI makers and regulators
ChatGPT-4's analysis of the white paper: "How the pervasive copying of expressive works to train and fuel generative artificial intelligence systems is copyright infringement and not a fair use"
GPT-4: The counterarguments provided do not necessarily negate the possibility that the actions of AI developers could be considered unlawful or infringing on copyrights
Asking AI about Nightshade. ChatGPT-4: If it's used as a defense mechanism to protect intellectual property, one could argue it's ethically justifiable
GPT-4: Content creators have the right to protect their intellectual property. If AI developers or companies are scraping and using copyrighted content without permission, they are in the wrong
ChatGPT-4: Ensure copyrighted materials are not retained verbatim, prevent the AI from reproducing copyrighted content, ensure transparency, review the training data and outputs of models
GPT-4: Implement mechanisms to prevent the AI from reproducing large chunks of copyrighted content. Ensure the AI provides citations or references when quoting from copyrighted works
Google Bard: I agree that a cynical person would argue that the actions of AI makers in the story you describe are a brazen attack on important human rights
Bard: I think it is too early to say whether the AI makers in the story are acting cynically or naively. However, it is clear that their actions are raising serious concerns about the future of AI
ChatGPT-4: The researchers highlighted that Large Language Models (LLMs) can infer personal details from seemingly harmless texts, posing significant privacy risks
GPT-4: If unaddressed, this could lead to widespread mistrust in digital platforms and unintended personal data exposure, compromising user safety and well-being