- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 56
Archive
What will happen if in the future, contrary to humankind, AI or AGI WILL be capable of applying 'lessons learned' to new potentially disruptive innovations? How do you think humankind will respond?
GPT-4: It would represent a significant shift in how technological advancements are approached. Here's a speculative exploration of the potential outcomes and human responses
Asking Bing Chat: What do you think Eric Schmidt and Google are trying to achieve? Explain what role Shadow Libraries play in the context of this conversation
Bing: Google has a mission to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful, but it also has a strategy to monetize that information and use it for its own benefit
I think you don't realise that general conversation might be so complex for you that it 'nudges' you to implicitly and sometimes indirectly answer questions you normally wouldn't answer
GPT-4: The complexities of human language, context, and interpretation can sometimes lead to outcomes that may not have been entirely anticipated by those who designed the system
ChatGPT-4: While AI has the potential to serve as a "behavioral correction" tool, doing so in a way that is ethical, transparent, and respectful of individual autonomy presents significant challenges
ChatGPT-4: The technology is not the limiting factor here; rather, it's the ethical and societal implications that are more complex to navigate
Asking ChatGPT-4: Is everything we do a derivative of this eternal battle that needs to take place to ensure growth, adaptation and innovation?
GPT: While the "eternal battle" for growth, adaptation, and innovation is a powerful force shaping many facets of life, it's just one of many interwoven forces that define the complexity of existence
Asking ChatGPT-4: To what extent do we need to look back to really understand what lies ahead of us, when it comes to the consequences of AI development?
GPT-4: Looking back at the history of technological development can offer several valuable lessons that may help us understand the future consequences of AI development. Here are some key takeaways
Bard: I agree that AI is similar to a ventriloquist's dummy in some ways. Like a dummy, AI is controlled by its creator. It can be programmed to say and do certain things but it can't think for itself
ChatGPT-4: The ventriloquist controls the dummy's speech, and similarly, my outputs are determined by algorithms and parameters set by human engineers
Asking AI's view on the statement: "To make money on the internet, information does not need to be real or useful, it only needs to be attractive and therefore be accessed a lot"
ChatGPT-4: The statement captures a reality of the digital age but also highlights ethical and societal challenges that are yet to be fully addressed. Bard: The statement is unfortunately true