- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 57
Archive
Asking AI: Isn't it a strange and problematic paradox if the use of an LLM prohibits the AI user from acquiring the knowledge to further scrutinise the LLMs output?
Can increased usage of LLMs by the world's population cause LLMs to only be able to ingest data it has been producing itself, since nobody is producing such information independently in an AI future?
GPT-4o: Suno's approach of using vast amounts of data available on the internet, including copyrighted material, to train their models is indicative of a common practice in the AI industry.
GPT-4o: AI developers often incorporate copyrighted material in their dataset without explicit permission from rights holders.
GPT-4o: Larger models memorize and reproduce more text from their training data, which increases the risk of copyright infringement (...) shows a direct correlation between model size and legal issues
GPT-4 sometimes provided contradictory responses, such as correctly stating the publication date of a public domain book but then claiming it was copyrighted.
GPT-4o: While it may be unrealistic to expect non-tech-savvy users to fully meet the technical and ethical demands placed by Microsoft without assistance, these challenges can be mitigated
By lowering barriers to entry and providing robust support, Microsoft can help ensure that all users, regardless of their technical expertise, can safely and effectively utilize Azure OpenAI services
GPT-4o: AI systems need to be trustworthy by design, not just by fixing issues after they occur.
Trustworthiness should come before trust. Trustworthiness involves demonstrating competence, honesty, and reliability. Building trustworthiness helps avoid accusations of “ethics washing”.
GPT-4o: While the report acknowledges concerns about AI-generated works mimicking artistic styles, it controversially concludes that current laws are sufficient and does not recommend new legislation
This decision has sparked debate among creators who feel their unique styles should be legally protected from AI replication.
GPT-4o: Governments should create regulations that require meaningful actions based on evaluation results, such as blocking unsafe models from the market.
Policymakers should mandate public participation in evaluations, support fundamental research into evaluation science, and develop third-party evaluation ecosystems.
GPT-4o: 'Content Protection-Fuse' is a promising approach to safeguarding against copyright infringement in language models by adaptively combining multiple models
Thus preventing the reproduction of memorized copyrighted material (by more than 25 times) while still producing high-quality outputs.
GPT-4o: The discussion revealed a cultural divide where common law countries (e.g., US & UK) view copyright more as an economic right, while civil law countries (e.g., France) emphasize human dignity
...and moral rights. This divergence could lead to differing global standards on the copyrightability of AI-generated works. China’s court decisions shift towards recognition of AI-generated works.
GPT-4o: India currently doesn't have a specific regulatory framework exclusively for AI. It relies on existing laws such as the Digital Personal Data Protection Act and the Information Technology Act
India has voluntary frameworks and guidelines for assessing and mitigating bias in AI systems, such as the Fairness Assessment Framework. The Responsible AI principles are voluntary.
GPT-4o: The belief in AI's transformative potential shares several characteristics with religious faith. This includes future-oriented promises, speculative elements, ethical frameworks...
...and community dynamics. Acknowledging the speculative nature of many AI ambitions is crucial to maintain a balanced and realistic perspective on the potential and limitations of AI technologies.
Perplexity: While neither LLMs nor tabloids should be blindly trusted, LLMs are generally more reliable due to their design principles and the absence of human biases or agendas.
Claude: That said, both LLMs and tabloids should be approached with critical thinking. Neither should be taken as entirely reliable without verification, especially for important information.