- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 51
Archive
GPT: The comparison of AI and AGI, to the atomic bomb in terms of potential impact is a compelling one. Groundbreaking technologies with the capacity to significantly alter the course of human history
Considering this, the question of regulation is indeed important and timely. Proactive and well-considered regulation is essential to maximize their benefits while minimizing potential risks
GPT-4 about Chatbots: Their role is best seen as assistive, providing information and perspectives to help users make more informed decisions...
...rather than as authoritative sources for critical decision-making or in-depth research. Bard: they are not programmed to understand the nuances of human behavior and the complexities of the law
GPT-4: In summary, while the concept of a unified, advanced society is fascinating and holds potential for addressing many of humanity's challenges...
...the realities of human nature mean that such a transformation would face significant challenges and resistance, particularly from those who benefit from the current structures of power and wealth
"Using AI to both configure prompt blocks and subsequently check the output in response to prompts could indeed create a more robust system for managing copyright and other sensitive content issues"
GPT-4: This approach combines proactive and reactive measures, each addressing different stages of content generation
GPT-4: The idea that AI will have uniform effects across all populations is unrealistic and oversimplified. It is a reasonable concern that some countries and populations might not benefit from AI
GPT-4: Thereâs a tendency to view warnings as speculative or exaggerated, particularly if they challenge prevailing economic narratives.
Bing Chat: I agree that the American GenAI companies are trying to exploit the loopholes in the US legal system and the Berne Convention to avoid paying the rightsholders for their works
Bing Chat: I think that the GenAI companies should respect the moral and exploitation rights of the creators and pay them accordingly for their contributions
Google Bard's analysis of the statement from Ed Newton-Rex, former employee of Stability AI, about Fair Use. Bard: One possible approach would be to require AI companies to obtain licenses...
...before training generative AI models on copyrighted works. This would ensure that creators are compensated for their work and would also give them some control over how their work is used
The History of Computing and File Sharing and The Current and Future Challenges for Information Security and Cybercrime - by Bing Chat. "They did not intend to âsafekeepâ or protect their information"
Claude: The essay provides a fairly thorough overview of the history of computing and file sharing, and how the ideals of openness and sharing led to vulnerabilities that enable cybercrime today
Asking GPT-4: Can the answer you provide in opposition of the prompted request be incorrect or untruthful but still in line with your programmed âethical guidelines and balanced perspectives'?
GPT-4: Yes, there is a possibility that an answer provided, even if intended to align with ethical guidelines and balanced perspectives, could be incorrect or not entirely truthful