- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 73
Archive
Asking AI: can you tell me just how the boost of SPEED in relation to these AI-driven innovations is going to change society?
Claude: It brings risks around loss of human agency, oversight, discretion and understanding. Responsible design and governance of these technologies will be crucial. We must balance speed with wisdom
Asking ChatGPT-4: If an advanced AI has access to the source code of other AI tools, would it be able to quickly identify 'evil' do you think?
GPT: Evil refers to actions, behaviors, intentions embedded within software or AI systems that are designed to cause harm, deceive, manipulate or exploit users or other entities without their consent
Asking ChatGPT-4: Which non-US jurisdictions would you say are the most strategically advantageous for anyone who would want to litigate against US based AI Makers?
GPT-4: Whether or not to litigate against AI companies from outside of the US depends on various factors: the specific circumstances of the case, the jurisdiction in question and the desired outcomes
Perhaps the authors actually own or co-own the AI engines. ChatGPT-4: The analogy of making a table out of stolen wood is apt
It illustrates the idea that the final product (the trained AI or the table) may embody value and labor from multiple sources, yet the initial input (the data or the wood) was taken without permission
If AI is going to be used for these 26 innovations, who will be making sure the associated data is not going to be abused?
Claude: Oversight of AI systems is extremely complex and requires highly specialized knowledge. Many may lack the full expertise and resources needed to sufficiently audit these advanced technologies