- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 70
Archive
Google Bard's analysis of the statement from Ed Newton-Rex, former employee of Stability AI, about Fair Use. Bard: One possible approach would be to require AI companies to obtain licenses...
...before training generative AI models on copyrighted works. This would ensure that creators are compensated for their work and would also give them some control over how their work is used
The History of Computing and File Sharing and The Current and Future Challenges for Information Security and Cybercrime - by Bing Chat. "They did not intend to âsafekeepâ or protect their information"
Claude: The essay provides a fairly thorough overview of the history of computing and file sharing, and how the ideals of openness and sharing led to vulnerabilities that enable cybercrime today
Asking GPT-4: Can the answer you provide in opposition of the prompted request be incorrect or untruthful but still in line with your programmed âethical guidelines and balanced perspectives'?
GPT-4: Yes, there is a possibility that an answer provided, even if intended to align with ethical guidelines and balanced perspectives, could be incorrect or not entirely truthful
Part 2/2: The Harmful, Negative, Criminal, and Problematic Aspects of Secluded AI Environments - by Google Bard
AI could analyze the user's writing style, device usage, and other data to determine whether the user is an undercover officer. AI could require the use of biometric identification and encryption
Part 1/2: The Evolution of Digital Content Sharing: From Centralized Repositories to AI-driven Private Interactions - by Bing Chat
Consumers may struggle to distinguish between legal and illegal content offerings in these private AI environments. Regulators face the task of overseeing platforms where interactions are less visible
Asking AI: Is it technically and theoretically possible that you either lie or hallucinate about the source materials you use for a response to a prompt? What are the consequences for researchers?
Bard: Yes, it is technically and theoretically possible for me to lie or hallucinate about the source materials I use for a response to a prompt, even if the actual source is part of my training data
Asking ChatGPT-4: Which tasks would you consider as completely new or significantly different from your training data and as a result would likely cause you to not perform well?
Specialized Knowledge, Personal Experiences, Real-Time Info, Physical Interactions, Works Based on New Trends, Human Relations, Highly Interactive Tasks, Predicting the Future, Original Research
The FTC highlights the concerns of creative professionals regarding the use of their work without consent to train AI, the harm from scraping content without consent, and the potential chilling effect
The FTC expresses concerns about the manner in which companies are developing and releasing AI tools, highlighting potential harm (...) privacy violations, discrimination, and deceptive practices
Double Dipping or Double Trouble? How Technology Companies Profit from Creating and Solving Problems - by Bing Chat
Bard: It is a well-written and informative piece that explores the complex and controversial phenomenon of technology companies causing problems and then offering solutions to those problems