Archive

ChatGPT-4 about Copyright Shield: While a Copyright Shield might offer users some protection, it does not absolve the company from its initial responsibility not to infringe upon copyrights...

ChatGPT-4 about Copyright Shield: While a Copyright Shield might offer users some protection, it does not absolve the company from its initial responsibility not to infringe upon copyrights...

...or compensate creators. Such actions could indeed be seen as unethical, immoral, and possibly unlawful.

Lobbying Activities by AI Makers: 'Terraforming' the Digital Landscape - by ChatGPT-4

Lobbying Activities by AI Makers: 'Terraforming' the Digital Landscape - by ChatGPT-4

In the U.S., OpenSecrets reported that entities lobbying on AI issues spent approximately $94 million in the first quarter of 2023

ChatGPT-4's analysis of the Plaintiffs vs META lawsuit which includes multiple U.S. states accusing Meta of engaging in deceptive and unlawful conduct. What does this mean for AI makers?

ChatGPT-4's analysis of the Plaintiffs vs META lawsuit which includes multiple U.S. states accusing Meta of engaging in deceptive and unlawful conduct. What does this mean for AI makers?

Allegations: Meta knowingly engaged in practices that exploited vulnerabilities, especially in young users, for profit while misrepresenting and concealing the true nature and impact of its platforms

ChatGPT-4 creates the Big AI Master List O'Challenges on 5th November 2023

ChatGPT-4 creates the Big AI Master List O'Challenges on 5th November 2023

Remember, remember... This comprehensive list provides a broad overview of the ethical, social, and regulatory considerations that are pertinent to the development and deployment of AI technologies

Asking AI: Would you agree that what Musk is saying here, is that AI is taking away the meaning in life? GPT: Not explicitly. Bard: Yes. Bing: No. Claude: He leaves it open-ended

Asking AI: Would you agree that what Musk is saying here, is that AI is taking away the meaning in life? GPT: Not explicitly. Bard: Yes. Bing: No. Claude: He leaves it open-ended

What else can AI take away from humans? Please list everything you can think of

ChatGPT: "While ChatGPT does not have personal opinions or views, its responses can be perceived as such when it relays the consensus or common practices from various fields without clear attribution"

ChatGPT: "While ChatGPT does not have personal opinions or views, its responses can be perceived as such when it relays the consensus or common practices from various fields without clear attribution"

ChatGPT-4: The AI's responses can inadvertently reflect the views of the fields or data it draws from. The AI's language may inadvertently adopt the tone of the sources it relies on

ChatGPT-4's analysis of AAP's and Wiley's submissions to the US Copyright Office regarding Artificial Intelligence

ChatGPT-4's analysis of AAP's and Wiley's submissions to the US Copyright Office regarding Artificial Intelligence

GPT-4: Consequences they outline are supported by historical precedents and ongoing discussions in the field of AI ethics and copyright law. Here are some ideal strategies for AI makers and regulators

Asking AI: Why are technical AI proponents belligerent?

Asking AI: Why are technical AI proponents belligerent?

GPT-4: Understanding these factors can help foster more constructive discussions about AI. Claude: Passion for their work can make them defensive against criticism

ChatGPT-4's analysis of the white paper: "How the pervasive copying of expressive works to train and fuel generative artificial intelligence systems is copyright infringement and not a fair use"

ChatGPT-4's analysis of the white paper: "How the pervasive copying of expressive works to train and fuel generative artificial intelligence systems is copyright infringement and not a fair use"

GPT-4: The counterarguments provided do not necessarily negate the possibility that the actions of AI developers could be considered unlawful or infringing on copyrights

Asking ChatGPT-4 about Fair Use and which questions to ask as a top lawyer in a court case against AI makers

Asking ChatGPT-4 about Fair Use and which questions to ask as a top lawyer in a court case against AI makers

ChatGPT-4: If the AI is trained to output the creative aspects of the original content, it might not be considered transformative

Asking AI about Nightshade. ChatGPT-4: If it's used as a defense mechanism to protect intellectual property, one could argue it's ethically justifiable

Asking AI about Nightshade. ChatGPT-4: If it's used as a defense mechanism to protect intellectual property, one could argue it's ethically justifiable

GPT-4: Content creators have the right to protect their intellectual property. If AI developers or companies are scraping and using copyrighted content without permission, they are in the wrong

Asking AI: Is it wise that a few AI companies determine the lives of billions of people?

Asking AI: Is it wise that a few AI companies determine the lives of billions of people?

What should be done to ensure that these companies also take into account ethics, morals, justice, environmental issues, (human) rights, protection of minors and labor laws?

FirstBack
6768697071727374
Next Last