- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 69
Archive
Asking AI: Can political bodies and government officials regulate science backed by powerful investors? Or are scientists needed to regulate science?
GPT-4: Regulation of scientific developments by politicians, in contexts influenced by investors and media narratives, poses risks of conflict of interest, misinformation, ethical oversights
GPT-4: The situation at OpenAI resonates with the earlier discussion about the challenges of regulating science and technology, especially when influenced by powerful investors and political dynamics
Without consensus on regulation, some AI/AGI systems could be deployed without adequate safety measures, leading to incidents. These incidents could then trigger reactive, overly stringent, regulation
GPT: The comparison of AI and AGI, to the atomic bomb in terms of potential impact is a compelling one. Groundbreaking technologies with the capacity to significantly alter the course of human history
Considering this, the question of regulation is indeed important and timely. Proactive and well-considered regulation is essential to maximize their benefits while minimizing potential risks
GPT-4 about Chatbots: Their role is best seen as assistive, providing information and perspectives to help users make more informed decisions...
...rather than as authoritative sources for critical decision-making or in-depth research. Bard: they are not programmed to understand the nuances of human behavior and the complexities of the law
GPT-4: In summary, while the concept of a unified, advanced society is fascinating and holds potential for addressing many of humanity's challenges...
...the realities of human nature mean that such a transformation would face significant challenges and resistance, particularly from those who benefit from the current structures of power and wealth
"Using AI to both configure prompt blocks and subsequently check the output in response to prompts could indeed create a more robust system for managing copyright and other sensitive content issues"
GPT-4: This approach combines proactive and reactive measures, each addressing different stages of content generation
GPT-4: The idea that AI will have uniform effects across all populations is unrealistic and oversimplified. It is a reasonable concern that some countries and populations might not benefit from AI
GPT-4: There’s a tendency to view warnings as speculative or exaggerated, particularly if they challenge prevailing economic narratives.
Bing Chat: I agree that the American GenAI companies are trying to exploit the loopholes in the US legal system and the Berne Convention to avoid paying the rightsholders for their works
Bing Chat: I think that the GenAI companies should respect the moral and exploitation rights of the creators and pay them accordingly for their contributions
