- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 65
Archive
If the goal is to create AGI-driven bots, shouldn't the bots be keeping to the same rules as their human counterparts anyway? Aren’t we spending too much time on discussing inadequate solutions?
GPT-4o: In some ways, we are indeed spending a lot of time on what could be seen as "inadequate solutions" if we consider that current AI technology is a stepping stone to AGI.
GPT-4o: The report critiques the current model of voluntary inclusion, where copyright holders have the choice to permit or deny the use of their content for AI training.
It argues that this model is insufficient and that more systemic, inclusive practices are needed. It challenges the autonomy of copyright holders and suggests a need for more interventionist policies.
Is it fair to say that AI makers have no means to predict the model output as a result of training data used and prompts put forward by AI users...
...and that they can only mitigate undesirable results somewhat on the basis of moderation, (keyword) filtering and blocking and the activation of protocols relevant to the nature of the prompt?
GPT-4o: While the current phase of AI development does prioritize rapid innovation, several driving factors suggest that security and robustness will increasingly become priorities.
AI makers who proactively address these issues may gain a competitive edge and contribute to a more secure and trustworthy AI ecosystem.
GPT-4o: Snap Inc. and Snap Group Limited were initially found to have potentially violated GDPR due to insufficient DPIAs and failure to consult the ICO.
However, after revising their DPIA to address the concerns, the ICO concluded that Snap had complied with GDPR requirements, and no further enforcement action was necessary.
GPT-4o: Generative AI indeed provides powerful tools for creativity and problem-solving. However, it should be emphasized that AI augments rather than replaces human creativity.
The unique human touch, cultural understanding, and deep contextual insights still play a vital role in creative processes, and AI should be seen as a collaborative tool rather than a replacement.
GPT-4o: AI as a feature allows for greater flexibility and adaptability. Companies can continuously update and improve AI functionalities based on user feedback and technological advancements.
This iterative improvement process is more straightforward within an integrated framework than with standalone products.
Revisiting Eric Schmidt's full conversation at Stanford about the AI status quo, using other people's Intellectual Property for AI training, and National Security
Perplexity: While Schmidt's candor provides valuable insights, a measured approach to some topics might have been appropriate given the sensitive nature of AI development and its global implications.
GPT-4o: The complaint against Twitter/X is filled with surprising revelations, especially around the lack of transparency and the potential for irreversible GDPR violations.
The potential GDPR violations and the comparison to industry standards make this complaint particularly valuable as it could shape future data protection practices and regulations.
GPT-4o: AI in Edtech. The concept of a "Dual Stack" approach, where developers are encouraged to create a "responsibility stack" alongside their "innovation stack," is unexpected.
Ethical considerations and risk management should be as integral to product development as technical innovation. The report places a substantial amount of responsibility on developers.
Gemini: Yes, the potential for AI to manipulate media with such precision and speed poses a profound threat to the concepts of authenticity, verifiability, accuracy, and reliability.
The past can be rewritten to suit any narrative, leading to confusion, conflict, and the loss of collective memory.