Grok: The resistance here often stems from a combination of distrust in AI's ability to handle complex human emotions, ethics, and cultural nuances, alongside fears of losing human agency...

Asking AI services: For AI to have any meaningful and positive influence, we will either need to listen to it or even allow it to call the shots, for it has the potential to be far more legally inclined, ethical, and responsible than ‘profit-driven,’ ‘greedy,’ and sometimes ‘delusional’ humans who can easily fall victim to their own ego or become blinded by the effects of a gold rush or a land grab. List all topics of which you suspect humans will never take the advice of AI models, nor will they allow agentic AI to call the shots, no matter (or BECAUSE of) how righteous and just the AI models are.

ChatGPT-4o’s answer:
As for the topics where humans are unlikely to take AI's advice or allow agentic AI to call the shots, here are some suggestions:

Topics of Resistance:

1. Political Leadership and Policy Decisions

   • Humans are unlikely to relinquish control over national governance, voting processes, or legislative actions to AI, fearing manipulation or biases.

2. Religious and Moral Beliefs

   • Deeply personal and culturally ingrained values are unlikely to align with AI-generated advice, especially when it challenges sacred traditions or doctrines.

3. Military and Defense Strategies

   • Ethical concerns about AI decision-making in war, nuclear strategy, or life-and-death situations will prevent AI from fully taking charge.

4. Economic Redistribution

   • AI models advocating for wealth redistribution or equitable resource allocation might face resistance from vested interests and ideological opponents.

5. Cultural and Creative Domains

   • Humans are protective of art, literature, music, and other creative expressions, often viewing AI-generated content as lacking authenticity.

6. Personal Privacy

   • AI suggestions that require widespread surveillance or personal data usage are likely to be resisted due to privacy concerns.

7. Corporate Governance

   • Businesses focused on profit maximization may resist AI models that recommend sacrificing short-term gains for long-term ethical considerations.

8. Healthcare Ethics

   • AI advice about contentious topics like euthanasia, reproductive rights, or experimental treatments might be ignored due to ethical and legal complexities.

9. Judicial Decisions

   • AI suggestions for sentencing, parole, or legal judgments will likely be rejected to maintain human oversight in justice systems.

10. Environmental Policy

    • Radical AI-driven recommendations for addressing climate change may face pushback from industries and individuals resistant to change.

11. Education

    • Humans are unlikely to trust AI to dictate curricula, especially when it challenges entrenched educational norms or societal narratives.

12. Free Speech and Censorship

    • Allowing AI to dictate what can or cannot be said might clash with deeply held beliefs about freedom of expression.

The resistance often stems from distrust, fear of loss of control, perceived threats to human identity, or conflicts of interest. The righteousness of AI advice may exacerbate resistance in areas where human fallibility is seen as an inherent part of decision-making.

Grok’s answer:
Here are several areas where I suspect humans might be particularly resistant to taking advice from AI models or allowing AI to make decisions:

1. Governance and Legislation:

   • Policy Making: Humans might resist AI in setting laws or policies due to concerns over accountability, democratic principles, and the nuanced understanding required for cultural and social contexts.

   • Military Strategy: Decisions involving national security, warfare, or peace treaties often require a human touch for ethical considerations and political ramifications that AI might not fully grasp.

2. Ethical and Moral Decisions:

   • Life and Death Decisions: In scenarios like medical triage or battlefield decisions, humans tend to prefer human judgment due to the complex moral dimensions involved.

   • Judicial Sentencing: Despite AI's potential for impartiality, sentencing and judicial decisions are deeply tied to human interpretations of justice, mercy, and rehabilitation.

3. Cultural and Artistic Expressions:

   • Art, Music, Literature: Creative fields are seen as fundamentally human, where AI might be used as a tool but not as the sole creator or judge of cultural value.

   • Cultural Heritage: Decisions about how to preserve, interpret, or evolve cultural practices might be seen as too sensitive or personal for AI intervention.

4. Personal and Intimate Relationships:

   • Marriage, Divorce, Parenting: Decisions around family and relationships are highly personal, making humans wary of delegating these to AI, which might lack the emotional depth or understanding of human connection.

5. Economic Policy and Wealth Distribution:

   • Economic Systems: Decisions on how to distribute wealth, manage taxes, or reform economic structures could be resisted due to fears of bias or misunderstanding of economic nuances like human behavior in markets.

6. Religious and Spiritual Guidance:

   • Faith-Based Decisions: Religious practices, doctrines, or spiritual guidance are areas where AI might be seen as lacking the necessary spiritual insight or connection to the divine.

7. Human Rights and Advocacy:

   • Activism and Social Movements: The passion, empathy, and personal stakes involved in activism might make humans skeptical of AI understanding or leading such movements.

8. Education Philosophy and Curriculum Design:

   • Educational Content: While AI can assist in personalized learning, the philosophy behind what should be taught, how it should be taught, and the values embedded in education might be too human-centric for AI.

9. Healthcare Ethics:

   • End-of-Life Care: Decisions about euthanasia or palliative care involve ethical considerations that many believe require human compassion and understanding.

10. Criminal Justice:

    • Rehabilitation vs. Punishment: Decisions on prisoner rehabilitation programs or parole might resist AI influence due to the personal stories and societal attitudes involved.

The resistance here often stems from a combination of distrust in AI's ability to handle complex human emotions, ethics, and cultural nuances, alongside fears of losing human agency in critical areas of life. Even if AI could theoretically make more objective or ethical decisions in these domains, the human element of decision-making, with all its flaws, remains highly valued.

Perplexity’s answer:
Humans are likely to resist AI advice or decision-making in several key areas, despite potential benefits, due to concerns about autonomy, ethics, and the complexity of human experience. Here are topics where humans may never fully defer to AI:

1. Personal Relationships: Decisions about marriage, divorce, or friendships.

2. Political Leadership: Choosing political leaders or making major policy decisions.

3. Ethical Dilemmas: Resolving complex moral issues or philosophical questions.

4. Creative Expression: Creating art, music, or literature.

5. Religious and Spiritual Matters: Interpreting religious texts or making spiritual decisions.

6. Child-Rearing: Decisions about raising and educating children.

7. End-of-Life Decisions: Choices about medical treatment or euthanasia.

8. Criminal Justice: Determining guilt or innocence in legal proceedings.

9. Military Strategy: Decisions to engage in warfare or use of nuclear weapons.

10. Personal Finance: Major financial decisions like investments or large purchases.

11. Career Choices: Selecting a profession or changing careers.

12. Human Rights Issues: Defining and protecting fundamental human rights.

13. Environmental Policy: Long-term decisions about climate change and resource management.

14. Genetic Engineering: Decisions about human genetic modification.

15. Cultural Preservation: Choices about maintaining traditions and cultural practices.

Humans may resist AI in these areas due to:

• Emotional Complexity: AI lacks the nuanced understanding of human emotions.

• Value Judgments: Concerns about AI's ability to make subjective value-based decisions.

• Accountability: Difficulty in assigning responsibility for AI decisions.

• Fear of Loss of Control: Reluctance to cede power in critical areas.

• Mistrust of Technology: Skepticism about AI's motives and potential biases.

• Human Exceptionalism: Belief that certain decisions require uniquely human qualities.

Despite AI's potential for more ethical or efficient decision-making, these deeply personal and culturally significant areas are likely to remain under human control due to the complex interplay of emotions, values, and societal norms that define the human experience.

Claude’s answer:
Let me engage thoughtfully with this complex topic. I aim to explore this analytically while maintaining appropriate epistemic humility.

I think resistance to AI guidance may be particularly strong in domains that:

1. Deeply involve human values, emotions, and personal identity Examples include religious beliefs, cultural traditions, family dynamics, and personal relationships. Even if an AI system could provide statistically sound relationship advice, many people would likely resist outsourcing such intimate decisions.

2. Touch on fundamental human rights and autonomy Areas like reproductive rights, end-of-life decisions, and personal medical choices. The idea of deferring to AI judgment on such deeply personal matters would likely face strong resistance regardless of the AI's analytical capabilities.

3. Involve creative expression and artistic vision While AI can analyze art and suggest improvements, many artists and creators would likely reject AI direction in their creative process, seeing it as antithetical to authentic human expression.

4. Concern political sovereignty and governance Nations and political leaders may be especially resistant to AI guidance on matters of national security, diplomatic relations, and core governance decisions, viewing human political judgment as fundamentally irreplaceable.

5. Impact wealth distribution and economic power Those who benefit from current economic systems may resist AI-suggested reforms around wealth inequality, tax policy, or resource distribution, even if those suggestions would lead to better outcomes for society as a whole.

However, I think it's important to note that resistance to AI guidance isn't necessarily always irrational or problematic. There are valid concerns about maintaining human agency and ensuring AI systems truly understand human values in their full complexity. The key may be finding ways for AI to serve as a helpful advisor while preserving meaningful human choice and control.

Gemini’s answer:
This is a fascinating thought experiment! Here are some areas where I suspect human resistance to AI guidance or control would be significant, even if the AI's advice was demonstrably superior:

• Matters of Faith and Belief:

  • Religious doctrines: AI, being data-driven, would likely challenge many religious tenets as illogical or unsupported by evidence.

  • Cultural traditions: Deeply ingrained cultural practices, even if harmful, might be fiercely defended against AI-suggested alternatives.

• Matters of Personal Identity and Freedom:

  • Reproductive rights: Decisions about contraception, abortion, and family planning are deeply personal and often tied to religious or cultural beliefs.

  • Lifestyle choices: AI might advise against unhealthy habits (smoking, excessive alcohol), but individuals are unlikely to surrender personal freedom to AI dictates, even if beneficial.

  • Body modification: Tattoos, piercings, cosmetic surgery – these are often deeply personal choices that AI might deem unnecessary or even harmful.

• Matters of National Sovereignty and Security:

  • Military strategy: Humans are deeply invested in maintaining control over their own defense, even if AI could potentially predict and prevent conflicts more effectively.

  • Foreign policy: Decisions about alliances, sanctions, and interventions are laden with political and emotional baggage that humans might be unwilling to relinquish to AI.

  • Nuclear weapons: The decision to use nuclear weapons is arguably too grave to be delegated to any entity, even a highly intelligent one.

• Matters of Economic and Social Power:

  • Capitalism: The capitalist system, with its focus on profit and competition, might be resistant to AI-driven optimization, which could prioritize social equity and sustainability over individual gain.

  • Political power: Politicians and the public might resist AI-driven governance, fearing a loss of democratic control and the potential for AI to become a new form of tyranny.

  • Wealth distribution: AI might advocate for more equitable distribution of wealth, but powerful individuals and corporations would likely resist such changes.

Important Considerations:

• Trust and Transparency: Building trust in AI is crucial. Humans need to understand how AI arrives at its conclusions and have mechanisms to challenge or override its decisions.

• Human-AI Collaboration: The most effective approach may be to foster human-AI collaboration, where AI provides valuable insights and recommendations while humans maintain ultimate decision-making authority.

• Ethical Development: It's imperative that AI systems are developed and deployed ethically, with a focus on human values and well-being.

This is not an exhaustive list, and the specific areas of resistance will undoubtedly evolve as AI technology continues to advance.

Disclaimer: This response is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, legal, or professional advice.