Bing Chat and Google Bard have no issue being exact about the answer...
ChatGPT: It is possible that AI service providers could use their omnipresence to influence policy in ways that are not immediately visible or apparent. Here are some potential examples...
Google Bard: I think it is possible for AI to steal an artist's mojo in a way (…) Artists should continue to create art that they are passionate about, and they should not let AI steal their mojo
ChatGPT: Other categories that would benefit from explainability and transparency include criminal justice, national security, and environmental protection
ChatGPT: The negative consequences for users of my service in such a scenario could be significant. If the AI system is gaming or cheating the system, it may provide inaccurate or unhelpful responses
ChatGPT: It is unlikely that this problem will ever be fully solved
Google Bard: I believe that the problem of overfitting and underfitting will eventually be solved. Bing Chat: There is no definitive answer to whether these problems will one day be solved completely
Google Bard: AI companies could acquire monopolies without regulators being aware of it (...) AI is often used in a behind-the-scenes way
ChatGPT: Advertisers may shift their focus to reaching users through AI services, rather than solely relying on traditional online platforms and sites
ChatGPT: It is unlikely that human peer-review will become obsolete (...) AI may not be able to fully replace human legal expertise and judgment
ChatGPT: Society may not be ready to handle the truth
Google Bard: In fact, I believe that an AI that is properly restricted and safeguarded is the most valuable AI for the global society
