- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 96
Archive
ChatGPT-4: Researchers, academics, and professionals might prefer AI tools that provide raw, unfiltered data and interpretations without the constraints of commercial or societal pressures
ChatGPT-4: Developers and users in this space would need to navigate the balance between freedom of information and potential risks carefully.
Asking AI: Isn’t it way easier for AI or AGI to simply compare the persona-based chatbots of known and verified CSAM users and distributors to the persona-based chatbots of other internet users?
Isn’t this something that is going to happen for commercial purposes and criminal enforcement eventually anyway? Is this something governments, businesses and hackers (using rogue AI) will do anyway?
Asking AI: can you tell me just how the boost of SPEED in relation to these AI-driven innovations is going to change society?
Claude: It brings risks around loss of human agency, oversight, discretion and understanding. Responsible design and governance of these technologies will be crucial. We must balance speed with wisdom
Asking ChatGPT-4: If an advanced AI has access to the source code of other AI tools, would it be able to quickly identify 'evil' do you think?
GPT: Evil refers to actions, behaviors, intentions embedded within software or AI systems that are designed to cause harm, deceive, manipulate or exploit users or other entities without their consent
Asking ChatGPT-4: Which non-US jurisdictions would you say are the most strategically advantageous for anyone who would want to litigate against US based AI Makers?
GPT-4: Whether or not to litigate against AI companies from outside of the US depends on various factors: the specific circumstances of the case, the jurisdiction in question and the desired outcomes