- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 5
Archive
GPT-4o: The firing of Shira Perlmutter and attempted installation of Trump loyalists in the Library of Congress represent a blatant abuse of power that violates constitutional norms, statutory law...
...and the doctrine of separation of powers. It reflects a disturbing pattern of authoritarian tactics deployed under the guise of executive efficiency or ideological retribution.
How a Trump-era initiative, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), headed by Elon Musk, overrode expert-led NIH decisions to cancel hundreds of research grants.
The article is a stark warning about the consequences of politically driven science governance and offers insights into the broader risks to scientific integrity, public health, and democratic norms.
Gemini: Tech companies leverage the slow pace of science and the lack of definitive causal evidence to resist policy interventions and minimize their own accountability.
This dynamic ensures that timely, high-quality evidence of digital harms is often not produced, thereby weakening the ability of governments and society to regulate these powerful entities effectively
Joshua James Hatherley presents a philosophical and ethical critique of the rising optimism around the role of AI in healthcare. His thesis runs counter to the utopian vision promoted by AI champions
....like Eric Topol, who claim that AI will free doctors from bureaucracy and enable deeper human connection. Hatherley calls this view fundamentally misguided...
It is plausible that many Republicans focus on the immediate tactical advantages of Thiel's support—his significant funding, his intellectual cachet, and the potent anti-establishment narrative...
...he helps to craft—without fully confronting, or perhaps without fully understanding, the more radical, systemic disassembly that his underlying philosophy implies.
The collective evidence strongly supports the hypothesis that a significant motivation for the Trump administration to retain power is to avoid legal repercussions, including potential imprisonment...
...for its members. Relinquishing power would lead to unacceptable legal risks. Each controversial action undertaken to shield against previous liabilities may itself incur further legal jeopardy.
The implications of prominent law firms reaching settlements with the Trump administration after being targeted by executive orders. They are walking into a legal and ethical minefield.
A stark warning to American and international legal institutions about the complex legal, ethical, and reputational dangers of capitulating to coercive executive power.
This report systematically examines terms and concepts that the administration appears to treat as obstacles or undesirable constraints—what can be termed its "dirty words."
Trump Administration's "Dirty Words" in governance include "audits," "compliance," "integrity," "oversight," "regulation," "international cooperation," "ethics," "rule of law," and "transparency."
GPT-4o: These warnings are not meant to provoke simplistic comparisons but to help citizens recognize the mechanisms by which freedom is eroded and evil becomes ordinary.
The behaviors seen in the current Trump administration—from authoritarian rhetoric to institutional decay—align with these historical patterns in chilling ways.
GPT-4o's Analysis of Claude 3.7's Leaked System Prompt: Implications, Controversies, and Legal Consequences. The prompt includes embedded mechanisms to avoid attribution.
Plaintiffs in lawsuits (e.g., Getty, NYT, authors’ guild) could argue that Claude’s outputs are shaped by source-sensitive reasoning layers designed to obfuscate training provenance.
Gemini on AI & Risks: It is fundamentally a question of values—what kind of future does humanity aspire to, what level of risk is acceptable in pursuit of that future...
...and whose voices are prioritized in making these profound determinations? It may require an ongoing societal negotiation.
AI can improve itself recursively, possibly leading to an intelligence explosion we can’t control. Nobody’s clearly accountable if something goes wrong.
There's a risk of "runaway AI"—AI that becomes smarter than humans and improves itself in unpredictable ways. The danger is that it might pursue goals not aligned with human values.