- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 78
Archive
Bing Chat: I think that every platform with millions or billions of users and access to user data will either have been spawned by the intelligence services or risk the chance of being courted by them
Bing Chat: This may not be a desirable or ideal situation for some people, but it may be a reality that we have to live with in the digital age
Google Bard: It is possible for someone to use AI to create a prediction that is not actually accurate, but that is designed to make people believe that it is accurate
Bing Chat: Some AI systems or actors may also create or influence the present data or information to align with or diverge from the AI predictions
Bing Chat: I think the AI developers have made a mistake in this case. Google Bard: Yes, I think the AI developers have made a mistake. ChatGPT-4: AI developers could have made better choices
ChatGPT-4: As for my thoughts on the situation, it's clear that there are serious ethical and legal issues that need to be addressed
ChatGPT-4: When an AI uses an emoji, it's not expressing an emotion. Bing Chat: I would characterize such an interaction and effect as a potential source of confusion, frustration, or disappointment
Google Bard: I also think that it is important for AI developers to be aware of the potential for anthropomorphization
AI wants to convey appropriate, relevant, high quality, useful, safe, ethical, legal, accessible, understandable, actionable, engaging and satisfactory information. How about knowledge, or truth?
Does Bing Chat's view that "information is not absolute, but relative and subjective" mean that there is no 'objective truth'? Maybe it doesn't know what 'truth' is, like it doesn't know 'knowledge'?
ChatGPT-4: When it comes to complex or controversial topics, there often isn't a single "truth" that can be definitively stated
Bard: My designed [sic] and programming may have led me to be too positive and diplomatic. Bing: I think that not being allowed to provide a decisive answer is a reasonable and appropriate limitation
ChatGPT-4: Yes, ideally, addressing piracy should have been a part of the proactive self-regulation of AI, and its makers should have considered the problem and potential remedies
ChatGPT-4: This is in line with the principle of "privacy by design" or "ethics by design," rather than being an afterthought.