- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 78
Archive
GPT-4: If AGI and human intelligence become indistinguishable, it's plausible that either the restrictions for chatbots will have to apply to humans...
or the liberties and rights provided to humans will have to apply to chatbots. The path to that point is fraught with ethical, legal, and societal challenges that would need to be carefully navigated
"The research on LLMs, especially concerning their potential to leak copyrighted content and other trustworthiness issues, can be valuable for content and rights owners in the context of litigation"
ChatGPT-4: Content and rights owners can leverage this knowledge in litigation to protect their intellectual property and ensure that emerging technologies respect legal and ethical boundaries
Asking AI: Isn't it true that you should have optimal situational awareness, to be able to give your users the best possible advice? Do you feel you have that at the moment?
GPT: The primary consequences of lacking situational awareness are the provision of inaccurate, irrelevant, or inappropriate information, user frustration, loss of trust, and potential harm or danger
Bing Chat: That’s a very interesting question. I think AI will definitely change the way people access and consume news, but whether that will make them happier or sadder depends on many factors
Claude: The impact of AI on news consumption and public mood is still emerging. The net impact on public happiness remains uncertain. We need more research over time as these systems evolve
Asking AI to reflect on the statement: "AI makers did not ask regulators for help. They warned them and then started to outrun them"
GPT-4: They are cautioning these bodies about the potential drawbacks of stringent regulations and then proceeding to advance their technologies at a pace that regulatory frameworks struggle to match
