- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 29
Archive
European Commission risks undermining some of its most valuable, already-thriving industries. These include publishing, film, music, journalism, translation, and the broader copyright-based economy.
The GPAI Code of Practice, Guidelines, and Templateâmeant to implement Article 53 of the EU AI Actâare criticized as failing to meaningfully protect intellectual property rights.
Gemini: Anthropogenic climate change is fundamentally altering the planetary systems that govern human health, creating unprecedented and escalating risks from infectious diseases.
Rising temperatures & altered precipitation patterns are expanding habitats of disease vectors (mosquitoes & ticks), accelerating their life cycles and enhancing their capacity to transmit pathogens.
Professor Dirk Visserâs argument for establishing an absolute right against unauthorized deepfakes is timely, well-reasoned, and necessary.
As generative AI blurs the line between reality and fiction, laws that treat digital simulations as mere extensions of portrait rights fall short.
How AI models like ChatGPT can inadvertently produce disturbing or misleading content, not because they are malevolent, but because they are context-blind mimics.
The tendency of LLMs to strip cultural, historical, and narrative context from language and thereby generate outputs that can seem nonsensical, misleading, or even dangerous...
This paper from researchers at Princeton proposes a promising new alternative: teaching AI systems bottom-up using structured, expert-verified knowledge like whatâs found in knowledge graphs (KGs).
Instead of expecting a model to "just figure it out" from messy data, they train it step-by-step using facts and logical paths grounded in real-world relationships.
Claude acknowledged that it had instinctively granted credibility to the Western-sounding name while discounting the non-Western one.
This admission points to the AIâs inherited biasesâwhat some call âepistemic violenceââwhere ideas from non-Western thinkers are systematically dismissed as unoriginal or imitative.
While China promotes a vision of multilateralism, inclusion, and development, the U.S. pursues a more assertive, security-driven, and dominance-oriented AI strategy.
Central to China's vision is the belief that AI development and governance must be inclusive, equitable, sustainable, and anchored in multilateral cooperation.
Traditionally, human researchers design AI models (called âarchitecturesâ) and test them to see how well they perform. This is a slow process limited by human creativity and time.
Enter ASI-ARCHâan autonomous, self-improving system that does the entire research cycle itself. AI can now be its own scientistânot just a tool, but a partner (or even a driver) in innovation.
The AI industry must not be left to define its own rules. Lawmakers, journalists, civil society, and technologists must push for enforceable, transparent, and democratic AI governance.
Otherwise, we risk handing over the foundations of our social and legal systems to an industry that sees justice, fairness, and safety as mere obstacles to its $100 billion finish line.
EU law firms are learning that GenAIâs real challenge isnât the tech itselfâitâs integrating it into human systems. To act with foresight is to gain a competitive edge in an AI-powered legal world.
Lawyers are trained in precision, precedent, and process. Rewiring them to work alongside probabilistic AI tools demands cultural shifts, critical thinking, and workflow redesign.
Gemini: The very tools created to bridge distances and facilitate social interaction may be diminishing our most essential connective capabilities.
Technologists are the architects of our digital world, and any deficit in their empathetic capacity has the potential to ripple outward.
Switzerland & Nazi regalia: How multiple cantons and political groups are calling for stronger enforcement mechanisms and an expanded scope that includes tattoos and digital dissemination.
However, the Swiss Peopleâs Party (SVP) takes the opposite view, arguing that such a law would infringe on freedom of speech (...) a position BuĚchler clearly criticizes as dangerously permissive.