- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 91
Archive
GPT-4o: This is a profound and critical observation. The discrepancy you're noticing between the positions of AI makers and the responses generated by LLMs reflects an inherent tension...
...in the development and application of AI systems. There are several reasons why AI may appear to operate on a higher ethical or moral level than its creators or corporations that control it.

GPT-4o: Both the gold rushes of old and the current AI boom share common elements of irrational exuberance, risk-taking, innovation, and societal transformation.
The AI rush’s long-term impact may be even more profound, as it not only reshapes industries but also touches on ethical, legal, and existential questions for society at large.

Claude: The CJEU ruled that Meta (Facebook) cannot use all personal data it has collected for targeted advertising without restrictions on time or type of data.
This applies even when users consent to personalized advertising. The ruling is based on the GDPR's principle of data minimization (Article 5(1)(c)). This decision will likely impact others as well.

GPT-4o: In conclusion, the current system of heavy public investment in AI, which disproportionately benefits large tech companies, may not be entirely fair to smaller AI firms.
The competitive landscape could become increasingly tilted in favor of established giants. This could potentially limit innovation and reduce the diversity of AI applications in the long run.

GPT-4o: I agree with the concerns about these opt-in by default practices, especially as they intersect with AI's growing influence over content creation and personal data usage.
Transparency, user consent, and control should be fundamental principles when dealing with personal data and AI. Companies should prioritize users’ rights over convenience.

GPT-4o: After reviewing the article and court order related to California’s new Anti-AI Deepfake Election Bill AB 2839, I generally agree with Judge Mendez's decision to grant a preliminary injunction
He acknowledged the unique dangers posed by deepfakes but concluded that AB 2839 was too blunt an instrument to address the issue, as it risked suppressing constitutionally protected speech.

Asking AI: Please analyze Microsoft’s post titled “Data, Privacy, and Security for Microsoft 365 Copilot” and tell me what pros and cons there are from a rights owner’s and business perspective
Also, tell me which of the risks and issues are likely to remain, whether MS should also have addressed other challenges not yet mentioned here, and whether you disagree with anything MS has stated.

GPT-4o: Specialized models like EuroLLM are designed to excel in specific domains, delivering higher performance, better cultural and linguistic accuracy & more efficient results for their focus areas
List all other areas of expertise that could use similar specialised LLMs and explain why

The overall impression from the statements of Silicon Valley executives seems to confirm a culture of "if we can grab it, we can use it," especially in the context of AI development and content usage.
This mentality, if left unchecked, could lead to a broader erosion of legal and ethical standards across various sectors, potentially causing significant societal, economic, and cultural damage.

Perplexity: After carefully analyzing the conversation, I do perceive a slight bias in ChatGPT-4o's responses, particularly in favor of OpenAI and its current direction. Here's why.
Grok: There are a few points where the responses might be perceived as slightly biased or at least, leaning towards a particular narrative. Claude: I do believe there is some evidence of bias.












