Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
Posts
GPT-4o: It is more likely that AI will be used to influence and indoctrinate populations before it systematically exposes secrets and unethical activities.

GPT-4o: It is more likely that AI will be used to influence and indoctrinate populations before it systematically exposes secrets and unethical activities.

Grok: The exposure of secrets and unethical activities by AI might happen sooner due to the immediate utility and demand for such technologies in various sectors.

Pascal Hetzscholdt
November 21, 2024

Asking AI services: What will happen first: AI, AGI or ASI ripping apart all secrets, propaganda and criminal or unethical plans, organizations or operations OR the global population being nudged, indoctrinated and lulled into obedience by omnipresent AI that permeates all data and devices? Use scientific evidence for your views.

ChatGPT-4o’s answer:
The likelihood of either scenario—AI exposing all secrets and unethical activities or AI being used to control and manipulate populations—depends on the interplay of several factors: technological capability, governance, societal resilience, and ethical frameworks. Here's an analysis based on current scientific understanding:

Scenario 1: AI, AGI, or ASI Unveiling Secrets and Corruption

Technological Capabilities: Advanced AI systems can process vast amounts of data and detect patterns humans might miss, potentially uncovering corruption, propaganda, and unethical behavior. Current AI is already used for fraud detection, investigative journalism, and analyzing disinformation.
- Example: AI-powered tools have uncovered financial fraud and exposed disinformation campaigns.
Challenges:
- Bias and Incompleteness: AI can be biased or manipulated by those who design or control it.
- Resistance and Countermeasures: Organizations with significant resources may use adversarial AI to obscure their activities or misinformation to discredit findings.
- Legal and Ethical Constraints: The unauthorized use of AI to access private or classified data would likely face legal challenges.

Scientific studies show that while AI can uncover misconduct, it often requires ethical oversight and cooperation from institutions to act on its findings effectively.

Omnipresence of AI: The integration of AI into daily life—through smartphones, IoT devices, and digital assistants—has created pathways for subtle influence.
- Behavioral "nudging" by AI is already being used in advertising, recommendation systems, and social media algorithms to shape choices and opinions.
- Research: Studies on algorithmic influence have shown how tailored content can reinforce biases and shape public opinion (e.g., the "echo chamber" effect).
Governance and Ethics:
- Nations with weak regulations or authoritarian regimes may exploit AI for mass surveillance, censorship, and propaganda.
- Example: China's social credit system combines AI and surveillance to monitor and reward or penalize behavior.
Scientific Concerns:
- Ethical AI guidelines emphasize transparency, but implementation is inconsistent globally.
- Studies warn that pervasive AI systems could amplify inequality, suppress dissent, and erode democracy.

Comparative Likelihood

Based on scientific evidence, Scenario 2 appears more imminent and feasible in the near term, for the following reasons:

Infrastructure Readiness: AI is already integrated into global communication networks, making it easier to nudge populations than to universally expose corruption.
Human Resistance to Change: Powerful entities (corporations, governments) often resist transparency, especially when it undermines their interests.
Control over AI: AI's use is often controlled by those in power, who are more likely to deploy it for self-preservation rather than disruption.

Conclusion

Without robust governance, ethical frameworks, and public awareness, it is more likely that AI will be used to influence and indoctrinate populations before it systematically exposes secrets and unethical activities. However, grassroots use of AI and collaborative efforts among whistleblowers, journalists, and civil society organizations could balance these forces, depending on the level of public resistance to misuse and the enforcement of accountability mechanisms.

Would you like to explore strategies to steer AI development toward transparency and accountability?

Grok’s answer:
Predicting the exact sequence of events regarding the evolution and impact of AI, AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), or ASI (Artificial Superintelligence) involves considerable speculation due to the complexity and unpredictability of technological advancement and societal adaptation. However, based on current trends, research, and expert opinions, here are some insights:

AI Exposing Secrets and Unethical Activities:

Current Capabilities: AI technologies today, especially in data analysis and pattern recognition, already have the capability to uncover hidden patterns in large datasets. For instance, AI systems are used in financial sectors to detect fraud, in journalism for investigative reporting, and by social media platforms to identify misinformation.
Potential for AGI/ASI: If AGI or ASI were developed:
- AGI: With the ability to understand or learn any intellectual task that a human being can, AGI could potentially enhance these capabilities to a level where it could autonomously analyze and expose complex networks of secrecy or unethical behavior across different sectors.
- ASI: Going beyond AGI, ASI would surpass human intelligence, potentially having the capability to not only expose but also predict and counteract such activities at a scale and speed unimaginable by current standards.
Scientific Perspective: Experts like those at the Machine Intelligence Research Institute highlight the potential for AGI to either solve or exacerbate existential risks, including the exposure of secrets or the manipulation of information for ethical or unethical ends.

AI Indoctrinating or Controlling the Global Population:

Current Trends: AI is already influencing behavior through personalized content on social media, targeted advertising, and recommendation systems. Concerns about AI in surveillance states, like in China with its social credit system, suggest a potential future where AI could be used for control or manipulation.
Omnipresent AI: The scenario where AI permeates every aspect of daily life, influencing decisions and behaviors:
- Feasibility: This would require AI to be integrated into all devices and systems, which is increasingly plausible with the Internet of Things (IoT) and smart cities initiatives.
- Ethical AI Considerations: Discussions around ethical AI, as documented by the Pew Research Center, suggest a split view where some fear manipulation, while others see potential for positive societal control, like in governance or public safety.
Scientific Evidence: Studies like those from the HKS Misinformation Review argue that fears about AI's role in misinformation might be overblown due to human adaptability and the existing abundance of misinformation, suggesting that control through AI might face significant resistance or counteractions from society.

Conclusion:

Which Comes First?:
- Exposure by AI: Given the current trajectory of AI development in transparency and accountability tools, it's more likely that AI will first be used to expose secrets and unethical activities due to immediate applications in sectors like finance, journalism, and cybersecurity. This is supported by existing AI applications and the push for more transparent systems.
- Control or Indoctrination: However, this scenario would require a significant shift in societal norms, regulatory environments, and acceptance of AI in decision-making roles. While AI's use for control is a growing concern, widespread indoctrination would likely meet with resistance unless accompanied by significant global consensus on AI governance, which currently seems less probable or immediate based on the diversity of views in AI ethics and regulation.

In conclusion, while both scenarios are within the realm of possibility, the exposure of secrets and unethical activities by AI might happen sooner due to the immediate utility and demand for such technologies in various sectors, whereas global control or indoctrination by omnipresent AI would require a more complex set of conditions to be met, including technological, societal, and regulatory changes.

Perplexity’s answer:
It's difficult to predict with certainty which scenario will occur first, as both involve complex technological and societal factors. However, we can examine some key considerations:

AI Exposing Secrets and Unethical Activities

The development of increasingly sophisticated AI systems could potentially lead to greater transparency and exposure of hidden information:

Advanced natural language processing and data analysis capabilities may allow AI to detect patterns and inconsistencies in large datasets, potentially uncovering hidden activities.
Improvements in computer vision and image analysis could make it harder to conceal physical evidence of wrongdoing.

However, there are significant challenges:

Powerful actors may develop countermeasures to maintain secrecy as AI advances.
Legal and ethical constraints may limit how AI can be used to access and analyze sensitive information.

On the other hand, the pervasive use of AI in digital platforms and devices creates opportunities for large-scale behavioral influence:

AI algorithms already play a major role in curating content and shaping user experiences on social media and other platforms.
Advances in natural language generation could enable more sophisticated and personalized persuasion techniques.

Some key concerns include:

The potential for AI systems to be used to spread misinformation or manipulate public opinion at scale.
Increasing personalization of content may create "filter bubbles" that reinforce existing beliefs.

Key Factors to Consider

The rate of progress in key AI capabilities like natural language understanding, computer vision, and generative models.
Developments in AI safety, ethics, and governance frameworks.
Public awareness and attitudes towards AI influence and data privacy.
The actions of major technology companies and governments in deploying and regulating AI.

While both scenarios present significant societal implications, the gradual influence of pervasive AI on information consumption and decision-making may be a more immediate concern. The exposure of secrets through AI would likely require more dramatic technological breakthroughs.Ultimately, proactive governance and ethical development of AI will be crucial in shaping which scenario, if either, comes to pass. Ongoing research and public discourse on these issues is essential as AI capabilities continue to advance.