• Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
  • Posts
  • The extensive use of Hollywood dialogue from films and TV shows to train artificial intelligence systems, raises significant ethical, legal, and creative questions.

The extensive use of Hollywood dialogue from films and TV shows to train artificial intelligence systems, raises significant ethical, legal, and creative questions.

GPT-4o: Rights owners could license content for AI training in controlled ways, ensuring compensation and ethical use.

ChatGPT-4o’s answer:
The articles "There’s No Longer Any Doubt That Hollywood Writing Is Powering AI" and "The Atlantic Uncovers OpenSubtitles Data Set at the Heart of AI Training" explore the extensive use of Hollywood dialogue from films and TV shows to train artificial intelligence systems, raising significant ethical, legal, and creative questions.

Key Points from Both Articles:

  1. Scope of Data Use:

    • Subtitles from over 53,000 movies and 85,000 TV episodes, including classics like The Godfather and contemporary series like Breaking Bad, have been used in AI training​.

    • These subtitles, primarily sourced from OpenSubtitles.org, are repurposed for training large language models (LLMs) by companies like Apple, Anthropic, Meta, Nvidia, and Salesforce. The models can mimic natural dialogue styles, expanding AI's capabilities in conversation and narrative generation​.

  2. Advantages of Subtitles for AI Training:

    • Subtitles are rich in the rhythm and nuances of spoken language, offering a unique resource compared to novels or academic texts. This makes them especially valuable for developing conversational AI​.

  3. Legal and Ethical Concerns:

    • Subtitles are considered derivative works, meaning their use without explicit permission might constitute copyright infringement. However, companies often claim "fair use" in defense of these practices​.

    • Creatives like Vince Gilligan, the creator of Breaking Bad, have criticized such practices, equating them to "an extraordinarily complex and energy-intensive form of plagiarism"​.

  4. Lack of Transparency:

    • Writers and other stakeholders are often unaware of how their work is being used. There is little clarity or consent in the process, which has sparked lawsuits and broader debates​.

  5. Implications for Human Creativity:

    • The reliance on Hollywood scripts and dialogue by AI systems threatens the livelihoods of writers, as these models could potentially replace human creativity in scriptwriting and other storytelling domains​.

  6. Industry Response:

    • Legal challenges are underway, but courts have yet to provide definitive rulings on the applicability of copyright law to AI training data. This legal gray area continues to fuel concerns about compensation, consent, and attribution for creatives​.

In summary, these articles highlight the transformative yet contentious role of AI in leveraging Hollywood dialogue for training. They call for greater transparency, legal clarity, and respect for creative rights in the rapidly evolving AI landscape.


Question 2 of 2 for ChatGPT-4o: How can Hollywood rights owners and individual writers use this information and how could AI makers have prevented this situation from occurring in the first place?

ChatGPT-4o’s answer:
How Hollywood Rights Owners and Writers Can Use This Information:

  1. Legal Advocacy and Enforcement:

    • Leverage Current Lawsuits: Writers and rights holders can support existing lawsuits or initiate new ones targeting companies that use their works without consent. This could pressure courts to clarify the boundaries of "fair use" in AI training.

    • Push for Legislative Action: Advocate for laws that explicitly require consent or licensing for AI training on copyrighted materials. This could include lobbying for provisions in digital replica or AI-related bills.

  2. Develop Licensing Frameworks:

    • Collective Licensing Models: Collaborate with other stakeholders (guilds, unions, and studios) to create industry-wide licensing agreements that AI developers must adhere to.

    • Content-Specific Licenses: Rights owners could license content for AI training in controlled ways, ensuring compensation and ethical use.

  3. Educate and Mobilize Stakeholders:

    • Inform screenwriters, directors, and other creatives about the scope of AI usage of their works. Awareness campaigns can strengthen collective bargaining positions.

    • Use tools (like The Atlantic's Hollywood AI Database) to identify works involved and pursue targeted actions for compensation or removal.

  4. Exploit Attribution and Marketing Opportunities:

    • Negotiate attribution requirements for trained AI systems to direct users back to original works, creating potential revenue streams and visibility for their creations.

  5. Innovate with AI:

    • Writers and studios could create their own AI models, trained on licensed data, to explore new creative possibilities or automate tasks like script suggestions, all while retaining control.

How AI Makers Could Have Prevented This Situation:

  1. Adopt Transparent and Ethical Data Practices:

    • Data Attribution and Tracking: Maintain detailed records of data sources and ensure that datasets used in AI training comply with copyright laws.

    • Explicit Permissions: Seek licenses or permissions before using copyrighted materials. This approach aligns with respect for intellectual property and avoids future legal and reputational risks.

  2. Collaborate with Creative Industries:

    • Engage directly with stakeholders in Hollywood to co-develop AI training frameworks that benefit both parties. This could include sharing revenues generated from AI models trained on Hollywood content.

  3. Limit Open-Source Risks:

    • Vet datasets included in open-source models to ensure compliance with legal and ethical standards. Avoid indiscriminate use of massive, aggregated datasets like OpenSubtitles that contain copyrighted materials.

  4. Strengthen Internal Policies:

    • Implement ethical AI development guidelines that explicitly prohibit the use of unlicensed data.

    • Conduct regular audits of datasets and training processes to ensure compliance.

  5. Proactively Address Legal Uncertainty:

    • Work with legal experts, governments, and industry groups to establish clear regulations governing AI training and data use. AI makers should be at the forefront of shaping these standards.

  6. Build Reputation through Compliance:

    • Companies that voluntarily adhere to ethical practices and licensing agreements would gain trust and goodwill, minimizing the risk of backlash from creators and consumers alike.

By addressing these issues proactively, AI makers could have avoided significant legal, ethical, and reputational challenges while fostering a more cooperative relationship with the creative industries.