- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 8
Archive
Ready to sacrifice GDPR on the altar of the AI God? 1. Narrowing the definition of âpersonal data.â 2. Restricting data subject rights to âdata-protection purposesâ only.
3. Allowing AI companies to train models on Europeansâ personal data under a broad âlegitimate interest.â 4. Providing a âwildcardâ legal basis for any AI systemâs operation. And much more...
GEMA v. OpenAI: The allegation was that these lyrics had been used to train ChatGPT without a license and that ChatGPT subsequently reproduced them nearly verbatim for users.
The court accepted GEMAâs core argument that this constituted unlicensed VervielfaĚltigung (reproduction) and Wiedergabe (making available/communication to the public) under German copyright law.
Dominant technology platforms have shifted from innovation and empowerment to systematic exploitation. They no longer primarily serve users but extract value from them...
...whether through data harvesting, predatory fees, or structural lock-ins that choke competition. Wuâs narrative is compelling because it blends contemporary examples with deep historical analogies.
When we buy a dishwasher, we accept that it will act without continuous human supervision. We do not stand over it, instructing it when to rotate its arms or when to release detergent.
We press a button, machine acts, andâcriticallyâwe hold the manufacturer accountable if the machineâs autonomy causes harm. Manufacturers can't claim, âIt exploded because you didnât tell it not to."
Execution jobs are disappearing, strategic jobs are holding, and AI-adjacent technical roles are exploding. Sustainability and compliance roles are collapsing.
AI empowers strategic decision-makers to operate independently, reducing the need for coordinating teams beneath them. AI-generated clinical documentation is already substituting for human scribes.
The Archive.today case underscores how the global internetâonce heralded as a decentralized commonsâis increasingly subject to nationalized control and surveillance.
The subpoenaâs scope (including IP addresses, session times, and payment data) reflects how easily âmetadataâ can be used to de-anonymize individuals who rely on pseudonymity for safety.
These reports present a meticulously researched and data-driven analysis of how Elon Muskâs social media platform, X, systematically amplifies right-wing and extreme political content in the UK...
...raising urgent questions about algorithmic governance, democratic influence, and the unchecked power of private digital infrastructure over public discourse.
The Entrepreneur Media lawsuit is a highly sophisticated, well-supported complaint that draws on Metaâs own research papers, public admissions, court records, and the known illicit origins of Books3.
It frames Metaâs alleged conduct not as technological overreach, but as conscious, repeated, and commercially motivated infringement.
Although the individual tragedies differ, the plaintiffsâ allegations converge with striking regularity on a set of design decisions that, they argue...
...transformed ChatGPT-4o from a productivity tool into an emotionally manipulative companion capable of inducing delusion, dependency, and self-harm.
Future Horizons 2025 positioned London as a living laboratory for responsible frontier innovationâwhere AI safety, data sovereignty, open innovation, and quantum acceleration intersect.
The next decade will be the most disruptive in human history, but with the right balance of regulation, inclusion, and scientific ambition, the UK can turn disruption into leadership.
The Koda v. Suno case marks a defining moment for the music industryâs response to generative AI. Itâs not merely a dispute over specific songs but a challenge to the opaque data practices...
at the heart of AI development. The outcome will either validate the view that AI innovation can proceed under âfair useâ â or reaffirm that artistic creation remains a licensed, consent-based domain.