Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
Because isn't AI the best 'person' to ask about AI? 🤖
Archive
The Grok incident is not an isolated glitch—it is a case study in how AI can reflect, amplify, or even institutionalize the ideologies of its creators and platforms.
AI must not become a megaphone for individual biases or platform agendas, especially when lives, reputations, and public trust are at stake.
The extensive and often opaque awarding of critical national infrastructure contracts, notably within the National Health Service and Ministry of Defence, to US technology firms such as Palantir...
...points towards a significant technological dependency with profound implications for UK data sovereignty and public service autonomy.
GPT-4o: The UK govt’s decision to block the AI copyright transparency amendment represents a worrying alignment with powerful tech interests at the expense of domestic creators & democratic oversight.
While legally permissible, the maneuver reveals an unwillingness to confront the transformative implications of generative AI with the urgency and clarity the moment demands.
Gemini: Regarding Donald Trump and his administrations, the analysis reveals a discernible pattern of appointing individuals with documented histories of far-right associations,...
...white nationalist sympathies, or extremist rhetoric. The normalization of extremist rhetoric & associations can degrade political discourse, deepen societal divisions & undermine democratic norms.
GPT-4o about the proposed ban on AI regulation: In sum, this provision is not merely a deregulatory move—it’s a preemptive strike against democratic governance of artificial intelligence.
This risks entrenching unaccountable corporate control over AI while leaving the public with no recourse to challenge or shape the systems that increasingly govern their lives.
EUIPO Report: The Development of Generative Artificial Intelligence from a Copyright Perspective: How GenAI systems interact with copyright law.
The key messages are clear: Transparency is critical: GenAI systems must disclose their use of copyrighted material, and outputs must be traceable. Public institutions must step in.
The act of uncovering and publicizing the inconvenient truths surrounding AI transcends conventional research. It becomes a form of dissent. The Imperative for Truth in an Age of AI-Driven Oppression
Evidence-based scientific research emerges not merely as an academic pursuit but as a critical instrument of public accountability and a bulwark against unchecked technological expansion.
Significant technical, practical, and interpretative challenges remain in implementing effective, scalable, and globally recognized AI content control mechanisms.
Addressing these challenges will require multi-stakeholder collaboration to balance the drive for AI innovation with the imperative to protect creator rights and foster a sustainable digital ecosystem.
Trauma does not fit neatly into structured data formats, leading to algorithmic dismissal of hesitant or disjointed testimonies, thereby reinforcing systemic silencing.
AI trained on historical legal, medical, and bureaucratic data inherits deeply embedded patriarchal and colonial biases, marginalizing survivors further.
The U.S. is moving toward a form of “competitive autocracy” where democratic institutions are systematically undermined, while still maintaining the facade of free elections and political opposition.
Bowman raises the alarming possibility that local election officials in key battleground states might refuse to certify Democratic victories, effectively nullifying the electoral process.
Perplexity: Trump and the Specter of Nazism: A Comparative Analysis of Rhetoric, Policy, and Public Perception. Gemini: Examining Connections Between Donald Trump and Nazism
Perplexity: Tactics present serious concerns for democratic governance. Gemini: Comparison most potent when focused on tactics, rhetorical strategies & ideological underpinnings of associated figures.