- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 86
Archive
AI wants to convey appropriate, relevant, high quality, useful, safe, ethical, legal, accessible, understandable, actionable, engaging and satisfactory information. How about knowledge, or truth?
Does Bing Chat's view that "information is not absolute, but relative and subjective" mean that there is no 'objective truth'? Maybe it doesn't know what 'truth' is, like it doesn't know 'knowledge'?
ChatGPT-4: When it comes to complex or controversial topics, there often isn't a single "truth" that can be definitively stated
Bard: My designed [sic] and programming may have led me to be too positive and diplomatic. Bing: I think that not being allowed to provide a decisive answer is a reasonable and appropriate limitation
ChatGPT-4: Yes, ideally, addressing piracy should have been a part of the proactive self-regulation of AI, and its makers should have considered the problem and potential remedies
ChatGPT-4: This is in line with the principle of "privacy by design" or "ethics by design," rather than being an afterthought.
Understanding the intersection of cognitive development, influence, and digital practices could have significant implications for how we approach education, mentorship, and regulation in Tech
Google Bard: not all digital crimes are committed by young people who are influenced by older masterminds. However, this is a growing trend...