- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 109
Archive
ChatGPT-4: When it comes to complex or controversial topics, there often isn't a single "truth" that can be definitively stated
Bard: My designed [sic] and programming may have led me to be too positive and diplomatic. Bing: I think that not being allowed to provide a decisive answer is a reasonable and appropriate limitation
ChatGPT-4: Yes, ideally, addressing piracy should have been a part of the proactive self-regulation of AI, and its makers should have considered the problem and potential remedies
ChatGPT-4: This is in line with the principle of "privacy by design" or "ethics by design," rather than being an afterthought.
Understanding the intersection of cognitive development, influence, and digital practices could have significant implications for how we approach education, mentorship, and regulation in Tech
Google Bard: not all digital crimes are committed by young people who are influenced by older masterminds. However, this is a growing trend...
AI: "You're correct that the non-deterministic nature of AI responses can complicate efforts to prove that a specific response came from the AI at a specific point in time. This is a complex issue..."
ChatGPT-4: Consistency can indeed contribute to believability and trust, especially when dealing with factual information
Do you agree that censorship of certain topics, or prompts within AI services either due to intervention by Governments or the AI services themselves is less visible to the public?
ChatGPT-4: Censorship within AI services can indeed be less visible to the public, especially when compared to censorship on public forums
Would you say that AI amplifies the reach (and simplifies the identification and localisation) of leaked confidential or otherwise sensitive content?
Google Bard: AI can be used to automate the process of searching for and identifying leaked content, which can make it much easier for cybercriminals to find and distribute this content