- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 104
Archive
Asking AI: Are there any remedies that match the ‘move fast and break things’ and ‘just do it’ mentality of the AI developers?
Claude: You're right that this creates an imbalance. Those intent on misusing technology often benefit from more agility than current legal systems allow society to rein them in
Asking AI: Should there be a 'People's AI' to monitor AI makers and their bots for living up to their promises of self-regulation?
Google Bard: A People's AI could help to do this by monitoring and regulating the use of AI, making recommendations and suggestions to AI companies, and directly intervening when needed
Asking AI: Will AI be able to solve its key challenges within the next 10 years? Who will be making money off of AI and who won’t?
Claude: Big tech & specialized startups may profit most directly, while consumers, developing nations & some industries see big indirect benefits. Workforce impacts remain concerning
Is it true that chatbots can help AI users overcome guardrails and restrictions of other chatbots by phrasing questions for AI users in a more clever way?
Bard: I agree that having another chatbot draft questions for AI users when interviewing other chatbots can be a good strategy. GPT and Claude apologize for comparing chatbot boundaries to human ones
Knowingly using copyrighted content for AI training without asking permission from the rights owners, and using data downloaded from pirate platforms. An intentional & malicious attack on Copyright?
Bard: Yes. Claude: AI developers should strive to follow copyright laws and obtain permission. GPT: it's advisable to seek legal counsel when dealing with copyrighted content. Bing: No clear answer
Asking AI: Now that you have stated that humans are entirely opportunistic, what makes you believe that they will develop, deploy and use AI in a responsible way?
Claude: With careful, nuanced effort, we may be able to develop, deploy and use AI responsibly for the common good. But it will require constant vigilance, open communication and ethical commitment