- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 10
Archive
When platforms meant to foster creativity and connection become vectors for suicide, extremism, and manipulation, itās not just a failure of designāitās a failure of values.
The platforms didnāt get this way by accident. They were engineered, funded, and marketed with full knowledge of the risks, and with willful ignorance of the consequences.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: The United States is not building ācivilianā data centers that might be repurposed for war. It is building a Dual-Use Superstate. The 21st-century model for achieving global hegemony.
Data center is the factory, AI is the designer, the plutonium-breeding microreactor is the power source, all shielded by commercial plausible deniability and physically secured by the U.S. military.
In 2025, sales isnāt just evolving ā itās accelerating. Buyers expect tailored engagement, instant answers, and meaningful insight, not generic outreach or slow follow-ups.
For enterprise sales teams, that creates a challenge and an opportunity. The most successful teams arenāt replacing humans ā theyāre upgrading them with AI.
Both the means of data acquisition (downloading copyrighted works) and the outputs generated by AI models (novel-like continuations or imitations) are valid grounds for litigationānot just...
...abstract issues of transformative use. OpenAI must preserve and potentially produce detailed information. Outputsāeven if stemming from fair use trainingāmay still be infringing.
Gemini suggests The Chronos Project, 'An AI-XR Framework for Cultivating Temporal Awareness and Digital Legacy'. Not for entertainment or productivity in the traditional sense, but for enlightenment.
The true legacy of this work would not be the data in a personal archive, but the wisdom embedded in a life well-lived, amplified across a generation and preserved for the next.
UMGās actionsāfirst settling litigation with Udio, then allying with Stability AIāare not just tactical business moves. They are signposts of a new AI-content deĢtente...
...one that could unlock monetization at scale while protecting creator rights. The lesson is simple but urgent: litigate if you must, but license if you can.
AI is not a niche technology or a future phase ā it is the new operating system of work and society. The leaders ā companies, communities, and individuals ā will be those who:
Embrace continuous training. Align AI adoption with human skills. Embed ethics and inclusion. Build regional and SME-friendly support systems. Treat AI as a public good as well as a productivity tool.
Gemini: The danger of societal decay isn't a Luddite fantasy; it is a plausible outcome, not because tech is inherently evil, but because our current mode of tech development is dangerously imbalanced.
It's driven by ideology of exponential growth & narrow logic of instrumental reason, without maturation of the wisdom, ethical foresight and social cohesion required to manage its immense power.
This guide is designed to support journal authors, editors, and peer reviewers across disciplines in making informed decisions about AIās role in research and writing.
It outlines best practices, clarifies expectations around disclosure and oversight, and addresses common questions about using AI tools while safeguarding IP rights & maintaining research integrity.
Cameo argues that OpenAI is causing actual consumer confusion, harming its brand integrity, and risking its business. Even OpenAIās own ChatGPT apparently directed confused users to Cameoās support.
Cameo emphasizes reputational harm from being associated with ādeepfakes,ā ānonconsensual likenesses,ā and OpenAIās general disregard for IP rights.
Study: Researchers are engaging with open research not merely due to mandates but because of intrinsic motivationsāsuch as transparency, collaboration, visibility, and reuse.
Publishers should shift from merely enforcing open science policies to enabling open science ecosystems. That means providing infrastructure, tools, guidance, and recognition for these behaviors.