The Solvency of Scale: A Forensic Analysis of NVIDIA’s Market Position and the Generative AI Ecosystem in Late 2025

by Gemini 3.0, Deep Research. Warning, LLMs may hallucinate!

Executive Summary: The Divergence of Narrative and Number

By the closing months of 2025, the global technology sector finds itself bifurcated into two distinct and increasingly incompatible realities: the skeptical “bubble” hypothesis, most notably articulated by critics such as Edward Zitron in late 2024, and the empirical reality of the Fiscal Year 2026 (FY2026) financial landscape. The Zitron thesis, predicated on the notion that the Artificial Intelligence (AI) boom is a “house of cards” fueled by circular financing, unsustainable capital expenditures (CapEx), and a lack of tangible end-user revenue, provided a necessary analytical counterweight to the hyper-growth narrative that defined the early 2020s. However, a forensic examination of market data through the third quarter of FY2026 suggests that while the structural risks identified by skeptics remain valid, the predicted collapse has not materialized in the timeframe or manner expected. Instead, the market has transitioned from a phase of speculative mania to one of industrial-scale entrenchment, characterized by a fundamental shift in the nature of the buyer.

As of November 2025, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) reported record quarterly revenue of $57.0 billion, a 62% year-over-year increase, driven almost entirely by the volume ramp of its Blackwell architecture.¹ This report exhaustively analyzes the validity of the “Hater’s Guide” arguments against the current backdrop of the semiconductor and hyperscale landscape. We find that while the “ROI Gap”—the disparity between infrastructure spend and software revenue—has widened to nearly $600 billion ³, the demand function for NVIDIA’s silicon has evolved beyond simple commercial return on investment (ROI) into a geopolitical and existential imperative for nation-states and technological incumbents.

This document dissects the triadic pillars of the bearish case: the alleged circularity of the CoreWeave relationship, the thermodynamic and economic limits of scaling, and the concentration risk of the “Magnificent Seven.” Through this analysis, we argue that NVIDIA has successfully maneuvered from a hardware vendor to the provider of sovereign critical infrastructure, effectively immunizing itself against short-term commercial ROI failures in the software layer for the duration of the current CapEx cycle.

1. The Architecture of Skepticism: Deconstructing the Zitron Thesis

To assess the accuracy of the skeptical view in late 2025, one must first isolate the core tenets of the argument presented in works such as “The Haters Guide to NVIDIA” and subsequent critiques throughout 2024. The bearish thesis was not merely a valuation call; it was a structural critique of the entire generative AI economy. It rested on fundamental pillars which we will test against the data available in December 2025.

1.1 The “Ponzi” of Circular Economics

The most damaging allegation within the skeptical framework was that NVIDIA’s revenue growth was synthetic, driven by investing in “neocloud” providers like CoreWeave. The argument posited that NVIDIA invested in these companies, who then used that equity and debt leverage—collateralized by the chips themselves—to purchase NVIDIA GPUs. This created a hollow revenue loop: NVIDIA moves cash to CoreWeave, CoreWeave moves cash back to NVIDIA as revenue, and NVIDIA books growth.⁴ This “round-tripping” narrative suggested that end-user demand was largely illusory and that the neoclouds were merely warehouses for unsold inventory masquerading as customers.

1.2 The Absence of Profitability

Zitron and others contended that Generative AI (GenAI) is a solution in search of a problem, where the cost of inference and training far exceeds the revenue-generating capability of the software. The critique posited that the unit economics of Large Language Models (LLMs) were fundamentally broken. Once the lack of profitability became undeniable—and the “greater fool” theory collapsed—corporate boards would force a cessation of GPU purchases, leading to a rapid implosion of NVIDIA’s order book.⁶

1.3 Physical and Economic Scaling Limits

A technical pillar of the bear case was the view that the next generation of GPUs (Blackwell) would hit thermodynamic walls. The argument suggested that the power consumption and heat dissipation requirements of these chips would make data center build-outs prohibitively expensive or physically impossible for all but a few entities. This “thermodynamic wall” would act as a hard cap on growth, contradicting the exponential curves priced into the stock.⁵

1.4 The Fragility of Monopoly

Finally, the thesis argued that NVIDIA’s “functional monopoly” was fragile because it was based on hostile terms. Zitron noted that customers “hate” NVIDIA due to pricing power and allocation strategies. The assumption was that as soon as viable alternatives (AMD, Intel, or internal silicon) appeared, the hyperscalers would defect en masse to preserve their own margins.⁶

2. The Financial Fortress: A Forensic Audit of FY2026

NVIDIA’s financial results for the third quarter of Fiscal Year 2026 (ending October 2025) provide the most concrete evidence to weigh against the bearish sentiment. The company’s ability to sustain hyper-growth on an already massive base contradicts the concept of a bursting bubble in the near term, although the composition of that growth reveals shifting undercurrents.

2.1 Revenue Trajectory and Margin Resilience

In Q3 FY2026, NVIDIA reported revenue of $57.0 billion, up 22% sequentially and 62% year-over-year.¹ Crucially, Data Center revenue—the proxy for AI demand—hit $51.2 billion.² The bear case often cited the inevitability of margin compression as competition entered the market. However, NVIDIA’s GAAP gross margins remained robust at 73.4%, only a slight compression from the 75% range seen in FY2025.²

The following table illustrates the financial progression through the critical transition period of 2025, highlighting the resilience of the margin profile despite the ramp-up costs associated with the new Blackwell architecture.

Table 1: NVIDIA Quarterly Financial Progression (FY2025 - FY2026)

Note: Q1 FY26 margins were impacted by a $4.5 billion charge related to H20 inventory for the China market due to export controls.⁸

This table illustrates that while the percentage growth rate has mathematically decelerated from the triple digits of 2024, the absolute dollar value added quarter-over-quarter continues to expand. The jump from $46.7B in Q2 FY26 to $57.0B in Q3 FY26 represents over $10 billion in incremental revenue in a single quarter—a figure larger than AMD’s entire annual data center revenue.⁹ This suggests that the market absorption of chips is accelerating in absolute terms, refuting the idea of a demand plateau in 2025.

2.2 Inventory Forensics and “Channel Stuffing” Allegations

A persistent shadow over NVIDIA’s success, raised frequently by skeptics, is the risk of “channel stuffing”—the practice of shipping excess inventory to distributors to recognize revenue prematurely. In Q3 FY2026, NVIDIA’s inventory rose significantly to $19.8 billion, up from $15.0 billion sequentially.¹

Zitron’s thesis would interpret this rise as a warning sign of stalling demand. However, a forensic review of the supply chain context provides a different explanation. The inventory composition is heavily weighted toward “Work-in-Process” (WIP), which accounted for 44.2% of the total.¹¹ This surge correlates directly with the production ramp of the Blackwell B300 and GB200 systems, which require complex CoWoS-L packaging and HBM3e memory integration. The long lead times for these components necessitate a buildup of WIP inventory before final assembly and shipment.

Furthermore, the Days Sales Outstanding (DSO)—a measure of how quickly customers pay—stood at 53 days in Q3 FY2026, down from 54 days sequentially.¹⁰ If NVIDIA were stuffing the channel with unwanted chips, we would expect DSO to balloon as partners delayed payment on unsellable goods. The stability of this metric, combined with the explicit commentary on “supply constrained” environments for the Blackwell series, suggests that the inventory build is a supply chain necessity rather than a demand failure.

2.3 The “Customer Concentration” Risk

A central tenet of the bearish thesis was NVIDIA’s reliance on a “Customer A” and “Customer B” (typically inferred to be Microsoft and Meta or Amazon). In FY2025, it was reported that nearly 40% of revenue came from massive buyers.⁶

By Q3 FY2026, this concentration persists but has shown signs of redistribution due to the rise of Sovereign AI (discussed in Section 6). However, the dependency on the “Hyperscale 4” (Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta) remains the single greatest structural risk to the stock. In 2025, these four companies alone are projected to spend over $300 billion on CapEx.¹³ If Zitron’s argument that “AI provides no return” proves true, this spending must eventually cease. However, Barclays estimates that this spending contributes approximately 1% to US GDP growth, creating a macroeconomic feedback loop that may force continued investment to avoid a recessionary impulse.¹⁴

The bear case argued that once the “training” phase of Large Language Models (LLMs) saturated, demand would collapse. The 2025 data refutes this by highlighting the shift to “inference” revenue. NVIDIA executives noted in late 2025 that “inference token generation has surged tenfold,” suggesting that the hardware is being consumed by active use, not just model training.⁸ This shift from training (capex) to inference (opex-like consumption) is critical for NVIDIA’s longevity.

3. The Circular Financing Paradox: CoreWeave and the Neoclouds

Perhaps the most potent and technically detailed argument in the “Hater’s Guide” was the alleged circularity of NVIDIA investing in CoreWeave, which then bought NVIDIA chips using debt collateralized by those same chips. This structure resembles the vendor-financing schemes of the 2000 dot-com bubble and warrants a deep investigation in the context of late 2025.

3.1 Unpacking the Debt Structure

In 2023 and 2024, CoreWeave raised billions in debt financing from Blackstone and Magnetar, collateralized by the NVIDIA GPUs they intended to buy.¹⁶ NVIDIA also invested directly in CoreWeave’s equity. Zitron argued this was a way for NVIDIA to “print” revenue by moving cash from its balance sheet to CoreWeave’s, which then flowed back as revenue.

By late 2025, CoreWeave had gone public (IPO in early 2025) and reported significant growth, but the circularity concerns evolved rather than vanished. The company projected $8 billion in revenue for full-year 2025, up from $2.4 billion in 2024.¹⁸ More importantly, CoreWeave reported a revenue backlog of $55.6 billion.¹⁹

3.2 Is it a Ponzi or a Utility?

The data from late 2025 suggests that CoreWeave is not a sham entity, but it is a highly leveraged utility. The “circularity” argument is partially defanged by the fact that CoreWeave’s customers are third parties—Microsoft and OpenAI signed contracts worth billions.¹⁸ If CoreWeave were merely holding the chips without customers, the fraud thesis would hold. However, because Microsoft (NVIDIA’s largest customer) is alsoCoreWeave’s largest customer ²⁰, the risk is concentrated in Microsoft’s ability to pay, not CoreWeave’s ability to find tenants.

The real risk identified in 2025 is the volatility of CoreWeave’s stock (CRWV), which fell ~60% from its post-IPO high.²¹ This indicates that while the business is real, the public market remains skeptical of the margins and the depreciation risk of the hardware. The bear case correctly identified the fragility of this model: CoreWeave is essentially an asset-leasing company (like an airline lessor) operating in a market where the asset (H100/B200) faces rapid technological obsolescence. If the rental rates for H100s collapse—as seen in the spot market dropping from $8/hr to ~$2.85/hr in late 2025 ²³—the collateral backing the debt loses value.

3.3 The “Pass-Through” Revenue Reality

The analysis confirms that CoreWeave acts as a “buffer” or a “capacity bank” for the hyperscalers. Microsoft uses CoreWeave to access NVIDIA GPUs without putting the depreciation directly on its own books immediately, or to handle overflow capacity. While this is not a “Ponzi scheme” in the criminal sense, it represents a concentration of credit risk. If Microsoft sneezes, CoreWeave catches pneumonia, and NVIDIA loses a key channel. Zitron’s skepticism was directionally accurate regarding the risk, but incorrect regarding the fraud. The revenue is real, but the credit quality of that revenue is inextricably linked to the continued solvency and spending of the “Magnificent Seven.”

4. The Thermodynamic Wall: Blackwell and Physics

Edward Zitron and other skeptics correctly identified the physical challenges of the AI build-out. They argued that the power and cooling requirements of next-generation chips would be a bottleneck that could halt adoption.⁵ The launch of the Blackwell (B200/GB200) architecture in 2025 provided a live stress test of this hypothesis.

4.1 The “Overheating” Narrative vs. Engineering Reality

In late 2025, reports surfaced that the GB200 NVL72 racks—massive systems connecting 72 GPUs—were suffering from overheating issues that required design revisions, potentially delaying deployment.²⁵ Critics seized on this as proof of the “thermodynamic wall.” The GB200 racks draw over 120 kilowatts (kW) of power, a density that renders traditional air cooling obsolete.²⁷

However, a deeper analysis reveals this to be a typical semiconductor ramp challenge rather than a fatal flaw. The industry response was not to abandon NVIDIA, but to upgrade the data center. Companies like Oracle and Microsoft deployed direct-to-chip liquid cooling infrastructure to accommodate the thermal density.²⁷ This transition did cause delays and required redesigns of the cooling loops and cold plates, but it did not stop the orders. By December 2025, NVIDIA was shipping between 150,000 and 200,000 Blackwell units in Q4 alone, with millions projected for 2026.²⁹

4.2 The “Delay” as a Bull Signal

Paradoxically, the delays caused by these thermal issues validated the “moat” argument. The fact that customers were willing to wait for redesigns and invest billions in new liquid-cooling infrastructure—rather than switching to available air-cooled alternatives from competitors—demonstrates the lack of substitutability of NVIDIA’s platform. If the bear case were true, and customers were looking for an exit, the Blackwell thermal issues would have been the catalyst for mass defections to AMD or internal silicon. That this did not happen suggests the performance per watt of the Blackwell architecture is still economically superior despite the implementation headaches.

5. The Economic Disconnect: The $600 Billion Question

The most enduring and scientifically valid critique from the bear camp is the “ROI Gap.” David Cahn of Sequoia Capital famously framed this as the “$600B Question” (updated from $200B): The industry is spending hundreds of billions on infrastructure, but AI software revenue is a fraction of that.³

5.1 The Widening Chasm in 2025

As of late 2025, the gap has not closed; it has widened.

• Infrastructure Spend: Gartner estimates global AI spending (mostly hardware/services) reached $644 billion in 2025.³⁰

• Application Revenue: Pure generative AI software revenue (e.g., Copilot subscriptions, ChatGPT Enterprise) is estimated at only $50-60 billion.³¹

• The Discrepancy: For every $1 spent on GPUs, the industry needs ~$4 of revenue to break even (covering energy, datacenters, and margin). The current ratio is inverted.

Zitron’s argument that “the apps don’t make money” remains accurate in the aggregate. Most enterprises are still in the “experimentation” or “pilot” phase, with high churn rates for AI tools.³² The bear case correctly identifies that the commercial software market alone cannot support this level of CapEx.

5.2 Why the Bubble Hasn’t Popped: The Game Theory of CapEx

If the ROI is so poor, why does spending continue? The 2025 landscape offers three reasons that arguably disprove the “imminent collapse” theory:

1. Defensive Expenditure: Hyperscalers are profitable enough (generating ~$350B in operating cash flow) to subsidize AI losses for years to prevent disruption.³³ They are burning cash to build a moat, not to generate immediate profit. The risk of under-spending is viewed as an existential threat, whereas over-spending is merely a financial inefficiency.³⁴

2. The “Agentic” Promise: The industry pivot in 2025 toward “Agentic AI” (systems that take action, not just generate text) is seen as the unlocking mechanism for the trillion-dollar software market.³⁵ Investors are betting on 2026/2027 being the years of software realization.

3. Efficiency Gains (Shadow Revenue): Companies are citing “productivity” and “efficiency” (labor reduction) as the ROI, rather than direct software sales. This “shadow revenue” is harder to quantify but justifies the internal CapEx for companies like Meta and Google.³⁶

Table 2: The ROI Disconnect (2025 Est.)

The bear case is correct on the math but incorrect on the timing of the reckoning. The market has decided to extend the timeline for ROI, treating AI as a 10-year infrastructure project (like 5G or Fiber) rather than a 2-year software cycle.

6. The Sovereign Pivot: Geopolitics as the Buyer of Last Resort

A crucial development in late 2025, largely unforeseen by the 2024 bear narratives which focused on corporate P&L, is the rise of “Sovereign AI.” This refers to nations building domestic compute capacity to ensure data privacy, national security, and economic competitiveness.

6.1 National Security as a Revenue Driver

NVIDIA has secured multi-billion dollar commitments from nation-states that operate outside the constraints of quarterly commercial ROI.

• Japan: The ABCI 3.0 supercomputer and government subsidies for AI factories.³⁷

• France: Partnerships with Scaleway and Iliad, supported by the French government’s national AI strategy.³⁸

• India: Collaborations with Tata and Reliance to build AI infrastructure for the world’s most populous nation.⁴⁰

• UAE: Massive investments in state-backed AI initiatives.⁴¹

6.2 Immunization Against Commercial Failure

This pivot is significant because nation-states are price-insensitive compared to corporations. They do not calculate “ROI” based on software subscriptions; they calculate it based on geopolitical relevance and cyber-defense capabilities. Just as nations stockpile weapons without expecting a commercial return, they are stockpiling H200/B200 chips. This creates a revenue floor that insulates NVIDIA from a corporate CapEx pullback. Zitron’s analysis failed to account for this strategic viability, assuming that if the chatbot bubble burst, demand would evaporate. The data suggests that even if the commercial bubble deflates, the sovereign arms race provides a safety net for NVIDIA’s order book.

7. The Competitive Landscape: CUDA vs. The World

A critical component of the bearish thesis is that NVIDIA’s margins are unsustainable because competition will inevitably commoditize the hardware. “The Haters Guide” implies that NVIDIA’s monopoly is fragile.

7.1 AMD: The Distant Number Two

By Q3 2025, AMD’s Data Center revenue reached $4.34 billion, growing 22% YoY.⁹ While impressive in isolation, this pales in comparison to NVIDIA’s $51.2 billion. AMD holds approximately 5-6% of the cloud accelerator market, while NVIDIA retains ~72% (with the rest going to custom silicon).⁴³ The “MI300/MI350” chips are competitive on paper, but the software ecosystem (ROCm) still lags behind CUDA, preventing mass migration of enterprise workloads.⁴⁴ The bear case assumed a faster erosion of NVIDIA’s moat than has occurred.

7.2 The Real Threat: Internal Silicon (ASICs)

The more potent threat identified in 2025 research is not AMD, but the internal chips of NVIDIA’s own customers.

• Google: The Trillium (TPU v6) offers cost-efficiencies for internal workloads that NVIDIA cannot match, specifically for Transformer models. Google’s TPU v6e is optimized for their specific models, offering superior interconnect scale.⁴⁵

• Amazon: Trainium2, despite reported “performance challenges” and “latency” issues compared to H100 ⁴⁶, is being pushed heavily to AWS customers to reduce reliance on NVIDIA.

• Microsoft: The Maia 100 chip, while delayed to 2026 for mass production, signals a long-term intent to offload OpenAI workloads from NVIDIA hardware.⁴⁸

Zitron’s point that “hyperscalers hate giving NVIDIA their margin” is validated. However, NVIDIA’s counter-move—selling full systems (NVL72 racks) rather than just chips—has made it harder for customers to switch. NVIDIA has effectively become a data center architect, increasing lock-in.

8. Conclusion: The Bubble is Hardening, Not Bursting

In reviewing Edward Zitron’s “Haters Guide to NVIDIA” against the backdrop of late 2025, we arrive at a nuanced verdict.

Where the Skeptics were Right:

• The ROI Gap is Real: The revenue from AI software is nowhere near justifying the trillion-dollar infrastructure build-out. The economics are currently upside down.

• CoreWeave is Leveraged: The financing structures supporting the secondary cloud market are fragile and dependent on the continued high value of GPU assets.

• Physical Limits are Testing Engineering: The heat and power issues with Blackwell are real, increasing the cost and complexity of deployment.

Where the Skeptics were Wrong:

• Underestimating Demand Elasticity: The “thirst” for compute is not just for chatbots. It is shifting toward agentic AI, robotics (Physical AI), and sovereign defense, broadening the TAM.

• Misunderstanding the Hyperscaler Mindset: The “Magnificent 7” are engaging in an arms race. In an arms race, cost efficiency is secondary to capability dominance.

• Predicting a Crash: Revenue and margins have not collapsed; they have stabilized at a high plateau.

Final Assessment:

NVIDIA in late 2025 is not Enron; it is closer to Cisco in 1999, but with a more entrenched moat (CUDA) and a customer base (Governments/Hyperscalers) with deeper pockets. The “bubble” exists in the valuations of downstream software companies that have yet to show profit, but NVIDIA, as the arms dealer, remains solvent and dominant. The collapse Zitron predicted requires a cessation of CapEx. The data indicates that CapEx is not stopping; it is merely shifting from “speculative training” to “defensive infrastructure” and “sovereign capacity.”

While the stock price may be volatile due to its perfect pricing, the underlying business fundamentals in late 2025 rebuke the “fraud” or “house of cards” narrative. The house is built of silicon and steel, and while it is expensive, it is currently fully occupied.

Works cited

1. NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Third Quarter Fiscal 2026, accessed December 17, 2025, https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-financial-results-for-third-quarter-fiscal-2026

2. NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Third Quarter Fiscal 2026, accessed December 17, 2025, https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/_gallery/download_pdf/691e34d93d633290a88deeef/

3. AI’s $600B Question - Sequoia Capital, accessed December 17, 2025, https://sequoiacap.com/article/ais-600b-question/

4. “The Hater’s Guide To The AI Bubble”. A sober look at the generative AI boom., accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.gregorybufithis.com/2025/07/24/the-haters-guide-to-the-ai-bubble-a-sober-look-at-the-generative-ai-boom/

5. Premium: The Hater’s Guide To NVIDIA, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-haters-guide-to-nvidia/

6. The Hater’s Guide To The AI Bubble, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-haters-gui/

7. NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2025, accessed December 17, 2025, https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-financial-results-for-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-2025

8. NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for First Quarter Fiscal 2026, accessed December 17, 2025, https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-financial-results-for-first-quarter-fiscal-2026

9. The AMD Story: Breakthrough Chips, Hyperscale Deals, Valuation Risks, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.investing.com/analysis/the-amd-story-breakthrough-chips-hyperscale-deals-valuation-risks-200671659

10. CFO Commentary on - SEC.gov, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581025000228/q3fy26cfocommentary.htm

11. Nvidia’s increase in days sales outstanding is ‘entirely reasonable,’ analyst says, accessed December 17, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/news/4525278-nvidias-increase-in-days-sales-outstanding-is-entirely-reasonable-analyst-says

12. NVIDIA (NVDA.US) Financial Report Reveals Customer Concentration Concerns as Two Major Clients Contribute Nearly 40% of Revenue - Tiger Brokers, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.itiger.com/news/1139690560

13. Feeding the AI beast, accessed December 17, 2025, https://privatebank.barclays.com/insights/ai-outlook-2026-11-2025/feeding-the-ai-beast/

14. What is the effect of AI capital expenditures on the US GDP growth trajectory - Investing.com, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/economy/what-is-the-effect-of-ai-capital-expenditures-on-the-us-gdp-growth-trajectory-4292434

15. Q1 2026 Global Outlook: As goes AI..., accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.ib.barclays/research/global-outlook/q1-2026-as-goes-ai.html

16. Big Tech needs a staggering $1.5 trillion to -3- | Morningstar, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20251108129/big-tech-needs-a-staggering-15-trillion-to-3

17. CoreWeave Secures $2.3 Billion Debt Financing Facility led by Magnetar Capital and Blackstone, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.coreweave.com/blog/coreweave-secures-2-3-billion-debt-financing-magnetar-capital-blackstone

18. CoreWeave revenue, valuation & funding | Sacra, accessed December 17, 2025, https://sacra.com/c/coreweave/

19. CoreWeave Inc.’s $2.25 Billion 1.75% Senior Unsec | S&P Global Ratings, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/type/HTML/id/3492923

20. CoreWeave Has Lost a Staggering Amount of Stock Value Over the Past Six Months, accessed December 17, 2025, https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/coreweave-lost-value-six-months

21. Nvidia’s Biggest AI Bet Is Crashing Its ‘Secret Portfolio.’ Can It Recover?, accessed December 17, 2025, https://247wallst.com/investing/2025/12/14/nvidias-biggest-ai-bet-is-crashing-its-secret-portfolio-can-it-recover/

22. CoreWeave stock falls 61% from all-time high—does it signal AI bubble fears? Here’s what to know, accessed December 17, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/coreweave-stock-falls-61-from-all-time-highdoes-it-signal-ai-bubble-fears-heres-what-to-know/articleshow/126008866.cms

23. NVIDIA H100 Price Guide 2025: Detailed Costs, Comparisons & Expert Insights, accessed December 17, 2025, https://docs.jarvislabs.ai/blog/h100-price

24. AI GPU Rental Market Trends December 2025: Complete Industry Analysis, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.thundercompute.com/blog/ai-gpu-rental-market-trends

25. [News] NVIDIA GB200 Racks Reportedly Overheat, Major Clients Cut Orders - TrendForce, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.trendforce.com/news/2025/01/14/news-nvidia-gb200-racks-reportedly-overheat-major-clients-cut-orders/

26. NVIDIA “Blackwell” NVL72 Servers Reportedly Require Redesign Amid Overheating Problems | TechPowerUp, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.techpowerup.com/328931/nvidia-blackwell-nvl72-servers-reportedly-require-redesign-amid-overheating-problems

27. Behind the Scenes: Scale your NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 deployments with dedicated OCI APIs, accessed December 17, 2025, https://blogs.oracle.com/cloud-infrastructure/behind-the-scenes-nvidia-gb200-nvl72-oci-apis

28. Nvidia employee says Microsoft’s cooling system for Blackwell GPUs ‘wasteful’, company responds, accessed December 17, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/nvidia-employee-says-microsofts-cooling-system-for-blackwell-gpus-wasteful-company-responds/articleshow/125935573.cms

29. NVIDIA To Ship 150K-200K Blackwell GB200 AI Servers In Q4 2024 Alone & 500-550K Units In Q1 2025 - Reddit, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/NVDA_Stock/comments/1g6yj8s/nvidia_to_ship_150k200k_blackwell_gb200_ai/

30. Gartner Forecasts Worldwide GenAI Spending to Reach $644 Billion in 2025, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-03-31-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-genai-spending-to-reach-644-billion-in-2025

31. Is the AI boom a bubble? The trillion-dollar disconnect between capex and revenue, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.financialexpress.com/market/global-markets/is-the-ai-boom-a-bubble-the-trillion-dollar-disconnect-between-capex-and-revenue/4075084/

32. $2 trillion in new revenue needed to fund AI’s scaling trend - Bain & Company’s 6th annual Global Technology Report, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.bain.com/about/media-center/press-releases/20252/$2-trillion-in-new-revenue-needed-to-fund-ais-scaling-trend---bain--companys-6th-annual-global-technology-report/

33. The AI buildout: boom or bust - Mackenzie Investments, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.mackenzieinvestments.com/en/institute/insights/monthly-economic-update-december-2025

34. The Game Theory of AI CapEx | Sequoia Capital, accessed December 17, 2025, https://sequoiacap.com/article/ai-optimism-vs-ai-arms-race/

35. 2025 NVIDIA Corporation Annual Review, accessed December 17, 2025, https://s201.q4cdn.com/141608511/files/doc_financials/2025/annual/NVIDIA-2025-Annual-Report.pdf

36. The state of AI in 2025: Agents, innovation, and transformation - McKinsey, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai

37. NVIDIA to Help Elevate Japan’s Sovereign AI Efforts Through Generative AI Infrastructure Build-Out, accessed December 17, 2025, https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/japan-sovereign-ai/

38. National Transformation With Sovereign AI - NVIDIA, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/industries/global-public-sector/

39. How Countries Are Building Sovereign AI to Reshape Global Strategy - NexGen Cloud, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.nexgencloud.com/blog/case-studies/how-countries-are-building-sovereign-ai-to-reshape-global-strategy

40. Telcos Across Five Continents Are Building NVIDIA-Powered Sovereign AI Infrastructure, accessed December 17, 2025, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/telcos-across-five-continents-are-building-nvidia-powered-sovereign-ai-infrastructure/

41. NVIDIA Launches NIM Microservices for Generative AI in Japan, Taiwan, accessed December 17, 2025, https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/nim-microservices-generative-ai/

42. AMD Reports Third Quarter 2025 Financial Results, accessed December 17, 2025, https://ir.amd.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1265/amd-reports-third-quarter-2025-financial-results

43. NVIDIA Powers Nearly 72% of Cloud Accelerator Locations, AMD at 5.8% | TechPowerUp, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.techpowerup.com/344158/nvidia-powers-nearly-72-of-cloud-accelerator-locations-amd-at-5-8

44. NVIDIA’s Blackwell AI Servers Faced With Overheating & Glitching Issues; Major Customers, Including Microsoft & Google, Start Cutting Down Orders : r/AMD_Stock - Reddit, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AMD_Stock/comments/1i0nigq/nvidias_blackwell_ai_servers_faced_with/

45. NVIDIA Blackwell vs Google TPU Trillium: The Battle for AI Compute in 2025 - Medium, accessed December 17, 2025, https://medium.com/@aayushbhatnagar_10462/nvidia-blackwell-vs-google-tpu-trillium-the-battle-for-ai-compute-in-2025-23de5ea41a80

46. Startups find Amazon’s AI chips ‘less competitive’ than Nvidia GPUs, internal document shows : r/amd_fundamentals - Reddit, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/amd_fundamentals/comments/1orxfux/startups_find_amazons_ai_chips_less_competitive/

47. Amazon “grateful” on customer feedback on its AI chips vs Nvidia’s; says - Times of India, accessed December 17, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/amazons-ai-chips-are-not-as-good-as-nvidias-startups-claim/articleshow/125193318.cms

48. Microsoft aims to swap AMD, Nvidia GPUs for its own AI chips - The Register, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/02/microsoft_maia_dc/

49. Microsoft delays production of Maia 100 AI chip to 2026 – report - BeBeez International, accessed December 17, 2025, https://www.bebeez.eu/2025/06/30/microsoft-delays-production-of-maia-100-ai-chip-to-2026-report/