- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 36
Archive
Oh boy, AI-using regulators can expect some 'nudging' for sure! š GPT-4o: If I were in charge, I would aim to establish a carefully tailored exemption that allows for AI trustworthiness research...
...while incorporating safeguards to address the concerns raised by opponents. This approach would enable essential AI research while minimizing the risks.
James Cameron talks about AI and is essentially saying the problem isn't gonna be Skynet...it's gonna be Tyrell Corporation. Claude: I'm somewhat skeptical of the argument that AI weapons would...
...necessarily reduce civilian casualties. Perplexity: I'm skeptical about our ability to create truly "aligned" AI systems, especially in the complex and morally ambiguous realm of warfare.
GPT-4o: GenAI as an approximation tool. While it is tempting to compare GenAIās failures with human errors, this oversimplification obscures the reality of how GenAI operates
By highlighting these consequences, the assessment could encourage a more grounded and nuanced approach to developing, deploying, and relying on GenAI systems.
Asking AI: The question is not "When AGI?". The question is "When non-hallucinatory, non-biased LLM?" (and associated 'agents'). What's your prediction for the latter?
A āmostly non-hallucinatory, mostly unbiasedā LLM might be feasible in the medium-term. However, achieving a truly error-free, unbiased model may require continuous refinements beyond that horizon.
Grok: Eliminating bias from AI models entirely is a challenging, if not an impossible task, given that bias can be deeply embedded in the data used for training, the algorithms themselves...
...and even in the human decision-making processes that design and deploy these systems. However, there are strategies and remedies to mitigate bias, taking into account evolving societal views.
GPT-4o: The issue reported in the article about Google, Microsoft, and Perplexity promoting debunked ārace scienceā through AI search results is highly concerning.
The surfacing of discredited theories that support "scientific racism" reflects critical failures in content filtration, data integrity, and the ethical governance of AI-driven outputs.
GPT-4o: Appen's 2024 State of AI report reveals both the progress and challenges in AI adoption. 93% of companies say they need better partnerships to handle tasks like data sourcing and annotationā.
Despite all the hype about AI automation, 80% of respondents say human involvement is crucial for refining AI systems. Managing bias and ensuring fairness in GenAI remains a key challenge.
GPT-4o: Without a clear, accountable consciousness, a chatbot cannot experience consequences or understand the gravity of misrepresentation, which is crucial for courtroom ethics.
If society and courts start to defer ethical or testimonial duties to machines, it could erode the accountability that underpins justice systems. Gemini: Chatbots could be manipulated or biased
GPT-4o: If one views "better" in the context of specialized customer service, then Claude might indeed outperform me in certain ways due to its fine-tuning, focus on safety, and specialized testing.
However, I offer broader functionality, covering a vast range of tasks that extend beyond customer service. Whether one is "better" than the other depends entirely on the intended use case.
GPT-4o: While it's true that some AI makers may focus more on improving models than on ethical considerations, there are ways to encourage greater adoption of the recommendations in the paper.
Stronger regulations, market pressure, internal culture shifts, financial incentives, transparency mechanisms, and collaborative efforts can make the ethical alignment of AI systems more compelling.
Resignation of Miles Brundage: Market-driven approach may be at odds with AI safety, especially when competing in a high-stakes environment where cutting corners could have devastating implications.
OpenAI's Miles Brundage himself noted that corner-cutting on safety is a risk when there is a zero-sum race mentality between competing AI companies.