"The report indicates that the overwhelming majority of the music authors and creators demand that AI providers should be obliged to disclose when they use copyrighted works as training data..."

Question 1 of 4 for MS Copilot: Please read AI AND MUSIC, MARKET DEVELOPMENT OF AI IN THE MUSIC SECTOR AND IMPACT ON MUSIC AUTHORS AND CREATORS IN GERMANY AND FRANCE and tell me what it says in easy to understand language

MS Copilot’s answer:I will try to summarise the main points of the PDF document for you. Here is what I found:

• The PDF document is a report commissioned by GEMA and SACEM, two collective management organisations for music authors and creators in Germany and France.

• The report examines the market development of artificial intelligence (AI) in the music sector and its impact on music authors and creators in these two countries.

• The report shows that generative AI, which can create music and other content from data, has a huge economic potential, but also poses significant challenges and risks for human creators.

• The report reveals that many music authors and creators are concerned about the loss of income, recognition, consent and personal rights due to the use of AI in music.

• The report calls for a fair and sustainable market for generative AI that respects and rewards the intellectual property rights of human creators and ensures transparency and accountability of AI providers and users.

Question 2 of 4 for MS Copilot: What are the most remarkable, surprising or controversial statements made in the report?

MS Copilot’s answer:Here are some of the most remarkable, surprising or controversial statements made in the report:

• The AI-generated gap: The report claims that by 2028, 27% of music creators’ revenues will be at risk due to generative AI, corresponding to an estimated potential damage of €950m in 2028 alone and a cumulative total damage for the period 2023-2028 of around €2.7bn.

• The lack of remuneration for human-made input: The report reveals that despite the fact that copyrighted works are used as training data for generative-AI models and therefore form the fundamental basis for the origin and development of the market, authors and creators do not participate in the immense growth prospects.

• The high level of fear and scepticism among music creators: The report shows that 71% of music authors and creators in France and Germany surveyed are afraid that the use of AI for music could lead to music creators no longer being able to make a living from their work, and that 64% of them believe that the risks of AI use outweigh its potential opportunities.

• The demand for credit, transparency, consent and remuneration: The report indicates that the overwhelming majority of the music authors and creators demand that AI providers should be obliged to disclose when they use copyrighted works as training data, that copyright holders must be asked for permission before their works are used as input for AI systems, that copyright holders should benefit financially when their works are used as input in AI training data sets, and that policymakers should pay more attention to the challenges related to AI and copyright.

Question 3 of 4 for MS Copilot: List all the actions AI makers, regulators, rights owners and content creators should be taking as a result of this report

MS Copilot’s answer:Here is a possible list of actions based on the report:

• AI makers should:

  • Disclose the use of copyrighted works as training data for generative AI and provide credit to the original authors and creators.

  • Obtain consent from the rights holders before using their works as input for AI systems and respect their right to opt out.

  • Remunerate the rights holders for the use of their works as input for AI systems, either through licensing agreements or other mechanisms.

  • Label the output of generative AI as such and prevent it from generating illegal or harmful content.

  • Comply with the existing and emerging regulations on AI, such as the EU’s AI Act, and cooperate with the authorities and stakeholders.

• Regulators should:

  • Clarify the legal status and liability of generative AI and its output, and ensure that it does not infringe on the rights and interests of human authors and creators.

  • Enforce the transparency, consent and remuneration obligations for AI makers and users, and provide effective sanctions for non-compliance.

  • Promote the development of ethical and responsible AI that respects the diversity and creativity of human expression and culture.

  • Engage with the AI industry, the creative sector and the civil society to foster a dialogue and a collaboration on the challenges and opportunities of AI in music and other fields of creation.

• Rights owners should:

  • Protect their intellectual property rights and personal rights from unauthorized or abusive use by AI systems, and seek compensation for past and present infringements.

  • Negotiate fair and equitable terms for the use of their works as input for AI systems, and benefit from the economic potential of generative AI in music and other fields of creation.

  • Monitor the use and impact of AI on their works and revenues, and adapt to the changing market and consumer preferences.

  • Explore the possibilities of using AI as a tool to enhance their own creativity and productivity, and to reach new audiences and markets.

• Content creators should:

  • Educate themselves on the implications and risks of AI for their creative work and professional development, and seek guidance and support from their peers and organizations.

  • Embrace the opportunities and challenges of AI as a source of inspiration and innovation, and use it to express their own originality and identity.

  • Collaborate with other creators, AI makers and users, and participate in the co-creation and evaluation of AI-generated content.

  • Advocate for their rights and interests in the AI ecosystem, and contribute to the public debate and the policy making on AI and music.

Question 4 of 4 for MS Copilot: Are there any topics missing from the report that should be addressed in future research?

MS Copilot’s answer:The report covers a wide range of topics related to AI and music, but there are some possible areas that could be further explored in future research, such as:

• Ethical and social implications of AI and music. How does AI affect the cultural diversity, identity, and expression of music? How does AI influence the perception, appreciation, and consumption of music? How does AI challenge the notions of authorship, originality, and creativity in music? What are the ethical principles and guidelines for using AI in music?

• Interdisciplinary and collaborative approaches to AI and music. How can AI and music benefit from the integration of different disciplines, such as psychology, neuroscience, sociology, and philosophy? How can AI and music foster collaboration and communication among different stakeholders, such as artists, researchers, educators, and policymakers?

• Educational and pedagogical applications of AI and music. How can AI and music enhance the learning and teaching of music theory, composition, performance, and appreciation? How can AI and music support the development of musical skills, creativity, and literacy? How can AI and music facilitate access and inclusion in music education?