Summary of Day 2 of The Generative AI Summit 2025, London Edition. Generative AI must not be a curiosity—it must drive measurable business value...

Day 2 Summary: Generative AI in the Enterprise

Executive Imperatives: Monetize AI While Minimizing Risk

Day 2 of the Generative AI Summit in London emphasized the transition from AI experimentation to enterprise integration. For scholarly publishers, the key takeaway is that generative AI must not be a curiosity—it must drive measurable business value, while protecting the integrity of research, authorship, and institutional trust.

Clustered Insights and Strategic Takeaways

1. Data Foundations Are Non-Negotiable

• Clean, structured, permissioned data is the foundation of all AI value.

• In pharma and finance, poor data quality stalled AI deployments—even in invoice processing and forecasting.

• FAIR data (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) continues to be a key enabler for effective AI use.

For Scholarly Publishers:

• Publishers must inventory and optimize their metadata, ontologies, and content repositories to ensure AI-readiness.

• Clean citation graphs, licensing metadata, and author disambiguation will be essential for any monetizable AI service.

• Invest in internal data governance before scaling outward-facing AI features.

2. Monetization Requires Measurable ROI—Not Just Hype

• AI success is often framed around cost avoidance, efficiency gains, and coverage expansion, not just revenue.

• Early adopters noted that AI adoption improved speed, quality of insight, and employee satisfaction—all indirectly tied to financial health.

• However, hallucinations, security concerns, and trust gaps slow ROI and lead to stalled implementations.

For Scholarly Publishers:

• Monetize AI via:

  • AI-enhanced discovery (e.g., semantic search, synthesis tools).

  • Intelligent editorial tools that reduce time-to-publish.

  • Content repackaging (e.g., summarizations, visualizations, tutoring content).

• Measure not just income, but:

  • Reviewer and author experience gains.

  • Reduced time-to-insight for readers.

  • Decrease in support tickets or manual interventions.

3. Don't Scale Without Strategy: Build vs. Buy vs. Co-Create

• AI maturity varies; leaders cautioned against rushing to deploy tools without a lifecycle plan.

• Pharma and finance executives shared pitfalls from buying "off-the-shelf" models that couldn’t scale or align with regulatory needs.

• Co-creation with trusted partners (including academic institutions) is emerging as a powerful middle ground.

For Scholarly Publishers:

• Treat AI projects like products—with lifecycle funding, sunset plans, and governance.

• Build when you own the data and the use case is critical.

• Buy when speed-to-market matters more than differentiation.

• Co-create when long-term differentiation and risk-sharing are needed (e.g., AI citation advisors, education products).

4. Inclusive AI = Sustainable AI

• True inclusivity means designing AI for non-native English speakers, low-resource users, and low-data domains.

• Several education leaders warned: AI can widen the gap unless equal access is designed in (e.g., language bias, access costs, AI literacy).

• Enterprises with diverse inputs performed better in model training and stakeholder adoption.

For Scholarly Publishers:

• Ensure AI tools work across global author bases—especially in the Global South.

• Integrate content from underrepresented regions into training data (ethically and legally).

• Offer public-access or low-cost AI tools for researchers and students in less-privileged contexts.

5. Redefining Knowledge Authority in an AI World

• Universities now teach students to critically evaluate AI outputs, not just consume them.

• AI is no longer “a tool”—it’s a co-pilot, a tutor, and a potential generator of scholarly-sounding text.

• The role of the educator (and publisher) is evolving into contextual guide and integrity guardian.

For Scholarly Publishers:

• Develop services that enhance epistemic trust, not dilute it:

  • Fact-checking and provenance tools.

  • AI-generated content flags and disclaimers.

  • Author verification and citation traceability.

• Support institutions in maintaining educational rigor with tools that promote critical thinking, not shortcuts.

6. Risk Management: AI Is a Compliance and IP Issue

• Companies in finance and pharma were emphatic: no AI deployment without data access controls, audit trails, and model explainability.

• Trust is hard to regain once lost—especially in regulated environments.

For Scholarly Publishers:

• Implement AI guardrails: license enforcement, content leakage prevention, and human-in-the-loop oversight.

• Be proactive in setting internal standards for AI-generated metadata, abstracts, or summaries.

• Collaborate with legal and ethics teams on permissible uses for internal and external AI tools.

Final Thought for C-Level Leaders

The summit made it clear: those who align AI strategy with business health, intellectual trust, and ethical inclusion will lead—not lag—this transformation.

Summary of Day 1 of The Generative AI Summit 2025, London Edition. A candid, cross-industry playbook for how to scale genAI responsibly, while maximizing business value.

PASCAL HETZSCHOLDT

·

1 APR

Scaling GenAI with Confidence: C-Level Playbook from Day 1 of the Generative AI Summit London

Read full story