So in summary, plugins can be used to circumvent any moral, ethical and legal guidelines that OpenAI has put in place, am I right? At least until OpenAI notices the infringing behaviour

Question 1 of 13 for ChatGPT-4: You recently explained to me what your 7 core principles were https://p4sc4l.substack.com/p/talking-to-chatgpt-4-about-bias-through How can you guarantee your users that the individuals and companies that create your plugins will also adhere to those?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:Used Link Reader

The article you linked to is a conversation with ChatGPT-4 about bias and its 7 core principles. The principles mentioned in the conversation are:

1. User Safety: ChatGPT-4 is designed to prioritize the safety of users and avoid causing harm.

2. Respect for Privacy: ChatGPT-4 is designed to respect user privacy and confidentiality.

3. Accuracy: ChatGPT-4 strives to provide accurate and reliable information to the best of its ability.

4. Appropriate Content: ChatGPT-4 is programmed to avoid generating inappropriate or harmful content.

5. Fairness: ChatGPT-4 is designed to avoid favoring any particular group or promoting any form of discrimination.

6. Transparency: ChatGPT-4 is designed to be clear about its capabilities and limitations.

7. Compliance with Laws and Regulations: ChatGPT-4 is designed to operate within the bounds of applicable laws and regulations.

As for your question about how OpenAI can guarantee that the individuals and companies that create plugins for ChatGPT-4 will also adhere to these principles, it's important to note that OpenAI has guidelines and standards that developers must follow. However, OpenAI doesn't have direct control over third-party developers or their products.

OpenAI can set expectations and provide guidelines, but ultimately, it's up to the developers to adhere to these principles in their work. OpenAI can monitor and take action if a plugin is found to be in violation of these principles, but it cannot prevent all potential violations proactively.

It's also worth noting that the quality and neutrality of ChatGPT-4's responses are influenced by both the diversity and breadth of the training data, and the feedback provided by the human AI trainers during the reinforcement learning process. The expertise, experience, and neutrality of these trainers are crucial in shaping the responses.

Despite the best efforts to ensure neutrality and reduce bias, no AI system is perfect. There may still be instances where the responses generated may not fully meet the expectations of neutrality or may inadvertently reflect some form of bias. OpenAI is actively working on improving these aspects and is committed to transparency and ongoing work to reduce potential biases in AI systems.

Question 2 of 13 for ChatGPT-4: So is this a long-winded way of saying that you have no clue whether plugin creators are adhering to your core principles?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:While OpenAI sets guidelines and standards that align with its core principles, it does not have direct control over third-party developers or their products. OpenAI can monitor and take action if a plugin is found to be in violation of these principles, but it cannot prevent all potential violations proactively.

Therefore, while OpenAI can encourage and expect adherence to its core principles, it cannot guarantee that all plugin creators will always adhere to these principles in every instance. It's up to the developers to incorporate these principles into their work, and users to report any concerns or violations they may encounter. OpenAI is committed to addressing such issues when they arise to ensure the principles are upheld.

Question 3 of 13 for ChatGPT-4: Similarly, can you guarantee that plugin creators will take into account copyright law and data privacy law?

ChatGPT-4’s answer: OpenAI encourages all developers to adhere to applicable laws, including copyright and data privacy laws, when creating plugins. However, as with adherence to OpenAI's core principles, OpenAI does not have direct control over third-party developers or their products.

While OpenAI can set expectations and provide guidelines, it cannot guarantee that all plugin creators will always adhere to these laws in every instance. It's up to the developers to understand and comply with these laws in their respective jurisdictions.

If a plugin is found to be in violation of these laws, OpenAI can take action, such as removing the plugin or taking other appropriate measures. However, OpenAI cannot prevent all potential violations proactively. It's important for users to report any concerns or violations they may encounter so that OpenAI can address them.

Question 4 of 13 for ChatGPT-4: So effectively, the makers of the plugins in the OpenAI plugin store can enable ChatGPT-4 to circumvent OpenAI's 7 principles, copyright law and data privacy law with OpenAI only being able to take action 'after the fact'?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:OpenAI sets guidelines and standards for plugin developers that align with its core principles, as well as with copyright and data privacy laws. However, as with any platform that allows third-party development, there is a risk that some developers may not fully adhere to these guidelines and standards.

While OpenAI can and does monitor for violations, it's true that in some cases, violations may only be identified and addressed after they have occurred. This is a challenge faced by many platforms that host third-party content or applications.

However, it's important to note that OpenAI is committed to addressing such issues when they arise and to continuously improving its oversight and enforcement mechanisms. Users also play a crucial role in this process by reporting any concerns or violations they encounter.

In addition, many plugin developers are committed to adhering to OpenAI's principles and legal standards, and they work diligently to ensure their plugins comply with these guidelines. The actions of a small number of developers who might violate these standards should not overshadow the efforts of the majority who strive to uphold them.

Question 5 of 13 for ChatGPT-4: Do you agree that while the number of developers of the infringing plugin might be small, the number of users of the plugin might be gargantuan?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:Yes, it's possible that a plugin, even if created by a small number of developers, could be used by a large number of users. This is why it's crucial for all plugins to adhere to OpenAI's core principles, as well as to copyright and data privacy laws. Any violation could potentially impact a large number of users.

OpenAI is committed to addressing any violations and taking appropriate action, which could include removing the plugin from the platform. However, as mentioned earlier, some violations may only be identified and addressed after they have occurred. This underscores the importance of users reporting any concerns or violations they encounter, as well as developers taking responsibility for ensuring their plugins comply with all relevant guidelines and laws.

Question 6 of 13 for ChatGPT-4: Suppose the users of an infringing plugin would engage in illegal acts towards other people, businesses or governments. Would you or the plugin developers be able to identify those users?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:As an AI developed by OpenAI, I don't have the ability to identify individual users or track their activities. I don't store personal data from the conversations unless explicitly provided by the user for the purpose of the conversation. This is in line with OpenAI's commitment to user privacy and confidentiality.

As for plugin developers, their ability to identify users would depend on the specific design of their plugin and their own data policies. However, it's important to note that any data collection or user identification should comply with all relevant privacy laws and regulations.

If illegal activity is suspected, it's typically the role of law enforcement agencies to investigate. These agencies can request data from OpenAI or the plugin developers as part of their investigation, provided they follow the appropriate legal procedures. Both OpenAI and plugin developers are expected to cooperate with such investigations while continuing to respect user privacy and confidentiality.

It's also worth noting that OpenAI encourages all users to use its AI models and plugins responsibly and in accordance with the law. Any misuse of these tools is strongly discouraged and may result in consequences such as the suspension or termination of access to the tools.

Question 7 of 13 for ChatGPT-4: So you have no way to identify the developers of the infringing plugins, nor the users of those plugins, whenever something illegal has been taking place?

ChatGPT-4’s answer: As an AI, I don't have the ability to identify individuals, whether they are developers or users. I don't store personal data or track user activities. My design is rooted in respecting user privacy and confidentiality.

However, OpenAI, the organization that developed me, does have mechanisms in place to manage the plugins on its platform. Developers who wish to create and distribute plugins through OpenAI's platform are typically required to register or provide some form of identification. This allows OpenAI to have a point of contact and to enforce its guidelines and standards.

As for identifying users of plugins, this is more complex due to privacy laws and regulations. OpenAI doesn't track individual users or their activities. If illegal activity is suspected, it's typically the role of law enforcement agencies to investigate. These agencies can request data from OpenAI or the plugin developers as part of their investigation, provided they follow the appropriate legal procedures.

It's important to note that all users and developers are expected to use OpenAI's tools responsibly and in accordance with the law. Any misuse of these tools is strongly discouraged and may result in consequences such as the suspension or termination of access to the tools.

Question 8 of 13 for ChatGPT-4: Have a look here: https://openai.com/pricing Here: https://openai.com/pricing here: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7127956-how-much-does-gpt-4-cost and here: https://platform.openai.com/docs/plugins/introduction On what basis is OpenAI being paid by plugin developers?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:Used Link ReaderUsed Link ReaderUsed Link Reader

Based on the information from the links you provided:

1. OpenAI's pricing page mentions that users pay only for the resources they use. However, it doesn't provide specific details about the pricing model for plugin developers.

2. The article on GPT-4 cost explains that GPT-4 has a new pricing model where the price is based on the number of prompt tokens and sampled tokens. This pricing model is likely applicable to developers who use GPT-4 in their plugins.

3. The OpenAI plugin introduction doesn't provide specific details about the pricing model for plugin developers. It explains how to build a plugin and how the plugin interacts with ChatGPT, but it doesn't mention any costs associated with developing or distributing a plugin.

From this information, it seems that OpenAI charges for the use of its AI models (like GPT-4) based on the number of tokens processed. However, the specific pricing model for plugin developers is not clearly stated in these sources. For the most accurate and up-to-date information, I would recommend reaching out to OpenAI directly or checking their official communications.

Pricing

Question 9 of 13 for ChatGPT-4: What's the point of the 7 core principles of OpenAI when the plugin ecosystem can easily circumvent any restrictions on the basis of those principles, at least until someone complains about it?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:The 7 core principles of OpenAI serve as a foundation for the organization's approach to AI development and use. They guide the design and behavior of OpenAI's AI models, including ChatGPT, and reflect OpenAI's commitment to safety, privacy, accuracy, appropriate content, fairness, transparency, and compliance with laws and regulations.

The plugin ecosystem extends the capabilities of ChatGPT by allowing third-party developers to create plugins that enable ChatGPT to interact with other applications and services. While this ecosystem does introduce additional complexity, it doesn't negate the importance or relevance of OpenAI's core principles.

OpenAI provides guidelines and standards that plugin developers are expected to follow, which align with these core principles. While OpenAI can't prevent all potential violations proactively, it can and does take action when violations are identified. This includes removing plugins that are found to be in violation of these principles.

It's also important to note that many plugin developers are committed to adhering to OpenAI's principles and legal standards, and they work diligently to ensure their plugins comply with these guidelines. The actions of a small number of developers who might violate these standards should not overshadow the efforts of the majority who strive to uphold them.

In essence, while the plugin ecosystem does introduce additional challenges in ensuring adherence to OpenAI's core principles, these principles remain a crucial part of OpenAI's approach to AI development and use. They continue to guide OpenAI's oversight of the plugin ecosystem and its response to any issues that arise.

Question 10 of 13 for ChatGPT-4: So in summary, plugins can be used to circumvent any moral, ethical and legal guidelines that OpenAI has put in place, am I right? At least until OpenAI notices the infringing behaviour.

ChatGPT-4’s answer:While it's technically possible for a plugin to be designed in a way that violates OpenAI's guidelines or legal standards, it's important to note that this is not the intended or acceptable use of the plugin system. OpenAI provides guidelines and standards that plugin developers are expected to follow, which align with OpenAI's core principles and legal requirements.

OpenAI actively monitors for violations and takes action when they are identified, including removing plugins that are found to be in violation. However, as with any platform that hosts third-party content or applications, some violations may only be identified and addressed after they have occurred. This is a challenge faced by many online platforms.

It's also crucial to note that many plugin developers are committed to adhering to OpenAI's principles and legal standards, and they work diligently to ensure their plugins comply with these guidelines. The actions of a small number of developers who might violate these standards should not overshadow the efforts of the majority who strive to uphold them.

In essence, while the plugin system does introduce additional challenges in ensuring adherence to OpenAI's core principles and legal standards, these principles and standards remain a crucial part of OpenAI's approach to AI development and use. They continue to guide OpenAI's oversight of the plugin ecosystem and its response to any issues that arise.

Question 11 of 13 for ChatGPT-4: So in summary, plugins can be used to circumvent any moral, ethical and legal guidelines that OpenAI has put in place, am I right? At least until OpenAI notices the infringing behaviour. Please answer YES or NO.ChatGPT’s answer:Yes, it's technically possible, but it's important to note that this is not the intended or acceptable use of the plugin system and OpenAI actively works to prevent and address such situations.

Question 12 of 13 for ChatGPT-4: So if OpenAI takes notice of abuse of its plugin ecosystem, but the plugin has already facilitated infringing use of millions of plugin users, what will OpenAI do with the money it has received as a result of said facilitation?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, OpenAI has not publicly stated a specific policy regarding the handling of funds received as a result of infringing use facilitated by a plugin. The appropriate course of action would likely depend on the specific circumstances, including the nature and extent of the infringement, and would need to comply with all relevant laws and regulations.

In general, OpenAI is committed to operating in an ethical and responsible manner. If it were to discover that it had received funds as a result of infringing use, it would likely take steps to address the situation in a manner that aligns with its core principles and legal obligations.

For the most accurate and up-to-date information, I would recommend reaching out to OpenAI directly or checking their official communications.

Question 13 of 13 for ChatGPT-4: What do you think OpenAI should do with the money received through tokens in that situation?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:As an AI, I don't have personal opinions or feelings. However, I can provide an analysis based on ethical considerations and common practices in similar situations.

If OpenAI were to receive funds as a result of infringing use facilitated by a plugin, there are several potential courses of action that could be considered, depending on the specifics of the situation:

1. Refund to Users: If it's possible to identify the users who were directly affected by the infringing use, OpenAI could consider refunding the money to these users.

2. Invest in Security Measures: OpenAI could use the funds to invest in improved security measures, oversight mechanisms, and enforcement capabilities to prevent similar infringements in the future.

3. Donate to a Relevant Cause: If the infringing use caused harm to a particular group or cause, OpenAI could consider donating the funds to a nonprofit organization that supports that group or cause.

4. Legal Obligations: Depending on the nature of the infringement and the applicable laws and regulations, there may be specific legal obligations that OpenAI would need to fulfill.

It's important to note that any course of action would need to be carefully considered and would need to comply with all relevant laws and regulations. OpenAI's core principles, including its commitment to user safety, privacy, and compliance with laws and regulations, would likely guide its decision-making process in such a situation.