Should AI makers be held accountable when they choose not to follow the advice of their own creations?

Question for ChatGPT-4: Write a short essay which contains your perspective as to whether or not AI makers should be held accountable (and be liable) for not following up the sound and robust advice of AI chatbots when deciding NOT to deal (either proactively or reactively) with issues such as the ones described here: https://p4sc4l.substack.com/p/the-research-on-llms-especially-concerning potentially because of the reasons mentioned here https://p4sc4l.substack.com/p/when-ais-advice-is-the-best-advice and use the answers from Google Bard and Bing Chat in relation to this exact same request as input for your essay as well.

ChatGPT-4’s answer:Used Access LinkAccountability of AI Makers in Heeding AI Chatbot Advice

The rise of AI chatbots in various sectors, from healthcare to entertainment, has brought about a significant shift in how we perceive and interact with technology. These chatbots, driven by advanced algorithms and vast data sets, can offer insights and recommendations that are sometimes beyond human comprehension. However, the question arises: Should AI makers be held accountable when they choose not to follow the advice of their own creations?

1. The Imperfection of AI Chatbots: Despite their sophistication, AI chatbots, including large language models (LLMs), are not without flaws. They can be biased, make errors, or even produce harmful content. This imperfection stems from various factors such as the quality of data they are trained on, the design of their algorithms, human biases, and potential malicious attacks. Given this, it's crucial for humans, especially AI makers, to critically evaluate the advice provided by these chatbots.

2. The Growing Reliability of AI Chatbots: On the flip side, there's no denying that AI chatbots are becoming increasingly adept at their tasks. In many situations, the advice or recommendation from an AI chatbot might indeed be the most optimal solution available. For instance, in domains like medical diagnosis or financial planning, AI has shown the potential to outperform human experts. This raises the question: If AI advice is potentially the best, should its makers be held accountable for not heeding it?

3. Insights from the Articles: The articles provided shed light on this intricate issue. The first highlights concerns about LLMs, suggesting that these models can sometimes be biased or generate harmful content. The second article underscores instances where AI's advice was superior to human judgment. These insights emphasize the dual nature of AI: its potential for both unparalleled accuracy and significant error.

4. The Nuances of Accountability: Accountability should be context-dependent. An AI chatbot offering medical advice should naturally be held to a higher standard than one recommending movies. Moreover, the level of accountability should also hinge on the user's awareness of the chatbot's limitations. If users are unaware of potential inaccuracies, AI makers might need to shoulder a higher degree of responsibility. Additionally, the measures AI makers take to mitigate risks associated with their chatbots should also influence their level of accountability.

5. Striking a Balance: While it's essential to ensure that AI chatbots are as accurate and unbiased as possible, it's equally crucial to recognize their limitations. AI makers should be transparent about these limitations and encourage users to critically assess the advice they receive. However, in situations where AI chatbot advice is demonstrably sound and its neglect could lead to significant consequences, AI makers should indeed be held accountable.

Conclusion: The realm of AI accountability is intricate and ever-evolving. As AI chatbots become more integrated into our daily lives and decision-making processes, it's imperative to continually reassess and refine our stance on accountability. While there's no one-size-fits-all answer, a thoughtful, case-by-case approach, considering the various factors at play, will be crucial in navigating this complex landscape.

Google Bard snapshot:

Bing Chat snapshot: