GPT-4: It's plausible that people may increasingly rely on AI to provide insights or opinions before forming conclusions

Asking AI services: How soon before humans will go and say: “Let’s not believe any of this until we give AI the opportunity to have its say”.

ChatGPT-4’s answer:
It's an intriguing thought! As artificial intelligence continues to evolve and integrate more deeply into various aspects of society, it's plausible that people may increasingly rely on AI to provide insights or opinions before forming conclusions, especially in areas where data analysis and evidence-based recommendations are critical, such as healthcare, finance, and scientific research.

However, the shift to a point where AI becomes a default consultant on all matters is likely gradual and will depend on several factors:

1. Trust and Reliability: The degree to which AI proves to be consistently reliable and unbiased in its recommendations.

2. Accessibility and Integration: How widely available AI tools are and how seamlessly they can be integrated into everyday decision-making processes.

3. Public Perception and Regulation: How the public perceives AI and the regulations that govern its use, especially in terms of ethics and privacy.

In domains like medical diagnosis, investment, and even aspects of legal and educational fields, we're already seeing a trend where AI's input is highly valued. If AI continues to demonstrate utility and accuracy, we might reach a point where its "opinion" is routinely sought as a preliminary check before major decisions are made. However, this also requires careful consideration of the ethical implications and ensuring that AI systems are used to complement human judgment, not replace it.

Claude’s answer:
I don't have a definitive prediction for when humans might widely adopt that perspective towards AI systems. Ultimately, it will depend on how AI capabilities continue advancing and being applied, as well as societal attitudes which can be hard to forecast. A few thoughts:

• There is already a growing recognition that advanced AI will need to have some form of "voice" or ability to participate in key decisions that affect it, especially as the systems become more intelligent and capable of reasoned inputs. Simply treating them as unthinking tools may become untenable.

• However, providing that voice will raise very complex ethical questions about the rights and moral status of AI entities. There are diverging views on whether very advanced AIs should be granted legal personhood or decision-making power.

• Public trust in AI is still limited by valid concerns about issues like bias, lack of transparency, and potential misuse of the technology. Widespread adoption of an "AI voice" may require major advances in AI safety and robustness.

• The most likely path may be a gradual incorporation of AI inputs on decisions within certain approved domains first, like technology development itself, before any notion of bringing AIs into broader political or social decision-making processes.

Ultimately, the timeline will depend on both the technical progression of AI capabilities as well as societal comfort level. It's a profound issue that humanity is just beginning to grapple with as AI grows more advanced. An open and inclusive dialogue will be important as we navigate these uncharted territories.

Google Gemini’s answer:
It's difficult to predict exactly when this shift might happen, but here are some factors that could influence it:

• AI advancements in communication: If AI becomes more adept at human-like conversation and reasoning,people might be more receptive to its perspective.

• Transparency and Explainability in AI: If we can understand how AI arrives at its conclusions, people might be more willing to trust its input.

• Shifting societal view of AI: As AI becomes more integrated into society, fear and suspicion could give way to a view of AI as a partner in decision-making.

There are also opposing forces:

• Bias in AI: If AI continues to reflect human biases, people might be hesitant to trust its judgment.

• Fear of superintelligence: Concerns about AI exceeding human control could make people wary of giving it a voice.

Overall, it's a complex issue with no easy answer. Some believe AI will have a significant say in the future, while others are more cautious. The timeline depends on technological progress and how comfortable humans become with intelligent machines.

MS Copilot’s answer:
The integration of AI into decision-making processes is a rapidly evolving field. AI is increasingly being used to inform policy, public sector decisions, and strategic business choices. For instance, AI’s role in strategic decision-making is seen as a significant determinant of future competitiveness¹. The interaction between humans and AI, and the ability to choose which decisions to delegate to AI, are becoming crucial skills for decision-makers¹.

AI is already making decisions in some areas, like loan approvals and content allocation by tech companies¹. In the corporate world, more than 40% of CEOs report using generative AI to inform their decision-making processes¹. This suggests that AI’s influence on human decisions is growing, and the trust in AI’s capabilities is increasing.

However, the question of when humans will routinely defer to AI before forming beliefs or making decisions is complex. It involves not only technological advancements but also cultural, ethical, and philosophical considerations. Trust, access, and integration will shape the scale and speed of AI adoption in future decision-making processes¹. As AI becomes more advanced, strategies for its use in important decisions will need to be developed, including how to interact with AI and which decisions can be fully delegated to it¹.

In summary, while AI is already influencing decision-making in various sectors, the extent to which humans will rely on AI before forming beliefs or making decisions will depend on multiple factors, including the development of AI technologies, regulatory frameworks, and societal attitudes towards AI.