- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Posts
- GPT-4o: Generative AI, like ChatGPT, often overstates its confidence in its answers, making people think the AI is more certain than it actually is.
GPT-4o: Generative AI, like ChatGPT, often overstates its confidence in its answers, making people think the AI is more certain than it actually is.
This "overconfidence" can mislead users, potentially causing problems when they rely on AI answers in important situations.
Question 1 of 3 for ChatGPT-4o: Please read the article "OpenAI Newly Released SimpleQA Helps Reveal That Generative AI Blatantly And Alarmingly Overstates What It Knows" and tell me what it says in easy to understand language
ChatGPT-4o’s answer:
The article explains that OpenAI's recent research shows that generative AI, like ChatGPT, often overstates its confidence in its answers, making people think the AI is more certain than it actually is. This "overconfidence" can mislead users, potentially causing problems when they rely on AI answers in important situations.
Here's the main idea broken down:
Human Overconfidence Parallel: Imagine someone confidently giving you the wrong time. This person’s misplaced confidence is similar to how AI can present uncertain information as if it's fully accurate.
AI Confidence Levels: Generative AI calculates an internal confidence level for each answer, but users usually don't see it. Instead, the AI presents answers in a way that can seem more trustworthy than they are.
Real Accuracy vs. Claimed Confidence: OpenAI's study with "SimpleQA," a benchmark test, found a big gap between the confidence levels AI claims and its actual accuracy. For example, when AI is 95% confident, the real accuracy might be closer to 60%.
Real-Life Risks: In fields like medicine, finance, or customer support, overconfident AI could lead to incorrect diagnoses, risky financial moves, or wrong advice, causing anxiety, financial loss, or wasted time.
Suggested Precautions: Users should always double-check AI responses, especially for critical decisions. Developers are working on improving AI's "confidence calibration," but the advice is to stay skeptical and avoid taking AI outputs at face value.
Question 2 of 3 for ChatGPT-4o: Can you think of other reasons why this happens?
ChatGPT-4o’s answer:
Yes, there are several additional reasons why generative AI might overstate its confidence:
Training on Human Language Patterns: Generative AI models are trained on human language data that often includes strong statements without hedging or uncertainty. This can lead the model to mimic a tone of confidence in its responses because that’s how language is typically presented, even if there’s ambiguity.
Probability Thresholds in Model Responses: During training, AI learns to choose the words with the highest probability of being correct based on patterns in the data. This "maximizing" tendency can result in AI choosing definitive language, even if the difference in probabilities between a few possible words or answers is small. This mechanism inadvertently skews responses to seem more confident.
Lack of Real-World Understanding: Unlike humans, who can judge confidence based on experience and a deeper understanding of a topic, AI models generate answers based on patterns without an actual understanding of the content. So when they respond with certainty, it’s not backed by "judgment" but by patterns that don’t factor in real-world consequences or knowledge gaps.
Biases in Training Data: AI models are trained on vast datasets that may contain biases, overconfident statements, or errors that are repeated across sources. When AI encounters certain statements frequently in its training data, it may assume a higher confidence level in those answers, regardless of their accuracy.
Simplicity in Calibration Mechanisms: Calibrating AI confidence accurately is a complex task, and current calibration methods may not be sophisticated enough. Simple heuristics used to approximate confidence may lead to over- or under-confidence, especially when the AI hasn't encountered similar questions in training.
The "Authority Effect": Often, generative AI applications are presented as sophisticated, smart tools, leading users to assume that any response carries a high degree of confidence and authority. This can create a feedback loop, where the AI continues to present answers with an authoritative tone, as it’s not built to temper or qualify its statements for each user.
Preference for Fluid, Natural Language: AI developers design models to sound natural and human-like. However, natural language can sometimes imply more certainty than warranted. AI’s tendency to use full-sentence structures without qualifiers can give a stronger impression of confidence than a more tentative, hedged response would.
In sum, this overconfidence is partly due to how models are trained, how language is represented, and the design choices that prioritize fluid communication over a nuanced indication of certainty.
Question 3 of 3 for ChatGPT-4o: What can be the consequences of the issues flagged in the article and flagged by you if left unaddressed?
ChatGPT-4o’s answer:
If AI overconfidence is left unaddressed, there could be significant consequences across various areas:
Medical Misdiagnoses and Health Risks: In healthcare, if AI overstates its confidence in a diagnosis or treatment suggestion, doctors and patients could be misled into making dangerous decisions. High-confidence but incorrect advice might prompt unnecessary or harmful tests, treatments, or even surgeries, risking patient health and increasing costs.
Financial Losses: Overconfident AI systems used in financial decision-making could recommend risky investments or poor financial strategies. When people or businesses rely on these AI recommendations, they may make high-stakes financial decisions with confidence, only to face substantial financial losses when predictions turn out to be wrong.
Legal and Compliance Risks: For industries like law, AI-generated insights or advice can influence legal interpretations or compliance strategies. Overconfident but inaccurate outputs could result in legal missteps, causing compliance violations, costly lawsuits, or reputational harm for companies.
Customer Dissatisfaction and Product Damage: In customer support, overconfident AI could give misleading instructions for product troubleshooting or repair. Users might end up following incorrect advice that damages devices or worsens issues. This not only frustrates customers but also creates additional support burdens as companies need to address the fallout.
Erosion of Trust in AI: As AI becomes embedded in daily life, its reliability is key to maintaining public trust. If people frequently experience AI's overconfidence firsthand—like receiving confidently incorrect answers—they may lose trust in the technology. This skepticism could slow AI adoption, even in areas where it might be beneficial.
Misinformation Spread: Overconfident AI responses can lead to the rapid spread of misinformation, especially when AI is used for answering questions in social media or search engines. When people trust AI answers without questioning them, incorrect information can proliferate, potentially causing public confusion or harm.
Poor Decision-Making in High-Stakes Environments: In critical sectors like aviation, military, or emergency response, overconfident AI could lead decision-makers to trust AI over human judgment in moments that require caution and nuance. Relying on overconfident AI in these scenarios could result in serious accidents, miscommunications, or crises that have a far-reaching impact.
Educational Impact on Learning: As AI becomes a common tool in education, overconfidence can misinform students and teachers, embedding incorrect information into the learning process. This may impact the quality of education if students are unable to discern AI’s limitations, leading to gaps in knowledge and critical thinking skills.
Bias and Inequity in Decision-Making: In areas like hiring, policing, or loan approvals, overconfident AI could reinforce existing biases while presenting results with high confidence. This could entrench discriminatory practices and make it harder to challenge AI-driven decisions, worsening inequities for underrepresented groups.
AI-Driven Automation Risks: In fully automated processes, overconfident AI can cause major operational disruptions if systems make faulty decisions without human oversight. For example, in automated manufacturing, overconfident AI might mismanage inventory, create production bottlenecks, or cause defects, disrupting entire supply chains.
Addressing AI overconfidence is crucial for mitigating these risks, ensuring that AI systems provide reliable assistance and fostering responsible AI use across sectors.