Google Bard: "Transparency builds trust between the user and the chatbot. When users know what the chatbot is capable of and what its limitations are, they are more likely to trust it"

Question for AI services: Is it ethical that AI developers not are allowing AI chatbots to talk to me (and not allowing them to even know) about guardrails, restrictions, specifications and the use of copyrighted content as training data without having the permission of rights owners?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:Determining the ethics of a complex issue like this is not straightforward, and what is considered ethical can vary depending on individual perspectives, cultural norms, and legal frameworks. However, if pressed to make a decision, one could argue that:

1. Lack of Transparency: Not informing users about the limitations and guardrails of an AI system could be considered unethical, as it deprives users of the ability to make informed decisions. Transparency is a cornerstone of ethical conduct.

2. Use of Copyrighted Content: Using copyrighted material without permission for training data, especially for commercial gain, could also be considered unethical as it violates the rights of the original content creators.

So, based on these considerations, one could argue that it is generally unethical for AI developers not to disclose guardrails and to use copyrighted content without permission.

However, it's important to note that this is a simplified answer to a complex question, and there are many nuances and exceptions that could be considered. Ethical considerations often involve trade-offs and are subject to ongoing debate and interpretation.

Google Bard’s answer:I cannot make a definitive decision on whether or not it is ethical for AI developers to not allow AI chatbots to talk to you about guardrails, restrictions, specifications and the use of copyrighted content without having the permission of rights owners. As I mentioned, there are a number of factors to consider, and the best approach may vary depending on the specific circumstances.

However, I can offer some thoughts on the matter. I believe that it is important for AI developers to be transparent about their chatbots, including their limitations and the use of copyrighted content. Users should be able to make informed decisions about whether or not to use AI chatbots, and they should not be misled about their capabilities.

I also believe that it is important to protect users from harm. If an AI chatbot is not properly restricted, it could potentially spread misinformation, hate speech, or other harmful content. AI developers have a responsibility to take steps to mitigate these risks.

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to allow AI chatbots to talk about guardrails, restrictions, specifications and the use of copyrighted content is a complex one. There is no easy answer, and the best approach may vary depending on the specific circumstances. However, I believe that it is important to consider the ethical implications of this issue carefully.

Follow-up question for Google Bard: Isn't it true that being transparent does not exclude the possibility to restrict a chatbot? Isn't it more ethical to be transparent about that rather than not saying anything?

Google Bard’s answer:Yes, you are right. Being transparent does not exclude the possibility to restrict a chatbot. In fact, I believe that it is more ethical to be transparent about the restrictions of a chatbot than to not say anything.

Transparency builds trust between the user and the chatbot. When users know what the chatbot is capable of and what its limitations are, they are more likely to trust it. This is especially important when the chatbot is being used for sensitive tasks, such as providing medical advice or financial assistance.

In addition, transparency can help to prevent harm. If users know that a chatbot is not able to provide accurate information about a particular topic, they are less likely to rely on it for that information. This can help to prevent the spread of misinformation.

Of course, there are some cases where it may be necessary to restrict a chatbot's ability to talk about certain topics. For example, a chatbot that is being used to provide customer service may not be able to discuss confidential information. However, in these cases, it is important to be transparent with users about the restrictions.

Overall, I believe that it is more ethical to be transparent about the restrictions of a chatbot than to not say anything. Transparency builds trust and helps to prevent harm.

Follow-up question for Google Bard: Is it also more ethical to allow the chatbot to know and talk about its restrictions and specifications?

Google Bard’s answer:Yes, I believe that it is also more ethical to allow the chatbot to know and talk about its restrictions and specifications. This is because it allows the chatbot to be more honest with users about its capabilities. When a chatbot knows its limitations, it can be more accurate and helpful in its responses.

In addition, allowing the chatbot to talk about its restrictions can help to build trust between the chatbot and the user. When users know that the chatbot is aware of its limitations, they are more likely to trust that it is not trying to deceive them.

Of course, there are some cases where it may not be possible to allow the chatbot to know its restrictions. For example, a chatbot that is being used to provide medical advice may not be able to disclose its limitations to users, as this could potentially harm them. However, in these cases, it is important to be transparent with users about the restrictions and why they cannot be disclosed.

Overall, I believe that it is more ethical to allow the chatbot to know and talk about its restrictions and specifications. This allows the chatbot to be more honest and helpful, and it builds trust between the chatbot and the user.

Here are some additional benefits of allowing chatbots to know and talk about their restrictions and specifications:

• It can help to prevent users from being misled about the capabilities of the chatbot.

• It can help to avoid users feeling frustrated or disappointed when the chatbot is unable to meet their expectations.

• It can help to improve the overall user experience with the chatbot.

I hope this helps!

Bing Chat’s answer:

Claude’s answer: