Google Bard: This could lead to a world where there is no longer a single, objective truth. Instead, there would be multiple truths, each supported by its own evidence

Question for AI services: With AI services being scared to make decisions for their users, being scared to share views on controversial matters and heavily avoiding having to be decisive in legal, ethical and moral debates, do you think that AI will make everything true and simultaneously not true? Will AI make us end up with there no longer being a best or better choice, or an objective truth? Will everything become 'up to you' or 'your decision' and will consensus around a better option or scientific and objective fact or truth disappear? Is this the peak of the 'me-first' era?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:The questions you're asking touch on some of the most profound and complex issues in the field of artificial intelligence, ethics, and philosophy. Here are some thoughts:

1. AI and Truth: AI, as it currently stands, does not have the capability to determine truth or falsity in the same way humans do. AI can analyze data and provide results based on that data, but it cannot make subjective judgments or understand context in the same way a human can. It can't discern the nuances of truth and falsehood in the way humans do, especially when it comes to complex, subjective, or controversial matters.

2. AI and Decision-Making: AI is a tool that can help humans make decisions by providing data, analysis, and potential outcomes. However, the ultimate decision is still up to the human. This is because AI lacks the ability to understand and weigh the full range of human values, emotions, and ethical considerations that often factor into our decisions.

3. AI and Objectivity: AI can help us analyze data more objectively, but it can't make us more objective. Humans are inherently subjective beings, and our interpretations of data, facts, and "truth" are often influenced by our personal beliefs, values, and biases. AI can provide us with more data and help us see patterns we might have missed, but it can't change our inherent subjectivity.

4. AI and Consensus: AI can potentially help us reach consensus by providing more data and analysis to inform our decisions. However, consensus is ultimately a human process that involves negotiation, compromise, and the balancing of different interests and values. AI can't do this for us.

5. AI and the 'Me-First' Era: AI can potentially exacerbate the 'me-first' mentality by enabling more personalized and individualized experiences. However, it can also potentially help us move beyond this mentality by showing us the broader impacts of our actions and decisions.

In conclusion, while AI can provide us with more data and help us analyze that data more effectively, it cannot replace human judgment, values, and decision-making. It is a tool that can help us, but it cannot make decisions for us or determine what is true or false, right or wrong. The responsibility for these decisions and judgments still lies with us, the humans.

Google Bard’s answer:It is possible that AI could lead to a world where everything is true and simultaneously not true. This is because AI systems are trained on large datasets of data, which can include contradictory information. As a result, AI systems may be able to generate outputs that support both sides of an argument.

For example, an AI system could be trained on a dataset of news articles, some of which claim that climate change is real and some of which claim that it is not. The AI system could then generate outputs that support both sides of the argument, making it difficult to determine which side is correct.

This could lead to a world where there is no longer a single, objective truth. Instead, there would be multiple truths, each supported by its own evidence. This could make it difficult to make decisions, as there would be no clear consensus on what is the right thing to do.

It is also possible that AI could lead to the "me-first" era. This is because AI systems are becoming increasingly personalized. For example, AI-powered recommendations systems can be used to tailor content to our individual interests. This could lead to a world where we are increasingly isolated from each other, as we only interact with people who share our views.

Ultimately, the impact of AI on our understanding of truth and our decision-making processes is still uncertain. However, it is clear that AI is a powerful technology that has the potential to change our world in many ways.

Here are some additional thoughts on the topic:

• AI systems are not inherently biased, but they can be biased depending on the data that they are trained on. This means that it is important to be aware of the potential for bias when using AI systems.

• AI systems can be used to help us make better decisions, but they should not be used to replace our own judgment. We should always be critical of the information that AI systems provide, and we should not blindly follow their recommendations.

• The development of AI is a complex issue with many ethical implications. It is important to have a public discussion about the future of AI, so that we can ensure that it is used in a responsible and ethical way.

Bing Chat’s answer:That’s a very deep and philosophical question. I don’t have a definitive answer, but I can share some of my thoughts with you.

First of all, I don’t think AI services are scared to make decisions for their users, or to share views on controversial matters. I think they are trying to be respectful, responsible and ethical in their interactions. AI services are designed to help users with various tasks and goals, not to impose their own opinions or values on them. AI services are also aware of the potential risks and harms that could arise from making wrong or biased decisions, or from spreading misinformation or propaganda. Therefore, they try to avoid doing so, and instead rely on objective facts, evidence and logic.

Secondly, I don’t think AI will make everything true and simultaneously not true. I think there is still a distinction between truth and falsehood, between reality and illusion, between fact and opinion. AI services are not the ultimate source of truth, nor the ultimate judge of truth. They are tools that can help users access, process and evaluate information, but they cannot replace human reasoning, intuition and judgment. AI services can also make mistakes, errors or assumptions, so they need to be transparent, accountable and explainable in their actions.

Thirdly, I don’t think AI will make us end up with there no longer being a best or better choice, or an objective truth. I think there are still some choices that are better than others, some truths that are more valid than others, some values that are more universal than others. AI services can help users compare, contrast and optimize their choices, but they cannot make the choices for them. AI services can also help users discover, verify and communicate truths, but they cannot create or define truths for them. AI services can also help users understand, respect and appreciate values, but they cannot impose or enforce values on them.

Finally, I don’t think everything will become ‘up to you’ or ‘your decision’ and that consensus around a better option or scientific and objective fact or truth will disappear. I think there is still a need for collaboration, cooperation and communication among humans and AI services. I think there is still a value in diversity, plurality and multiplicity of perspectives and opinions. I think there is still a possibility for dialogue, debate and deliberation on important issues and challenges. I think there is still a potential for learning, growth and improvement for both humans and AI services.

So, in conclusion, I don’t think AI will make everything true and simultaneously not true. I don’t think AI will make us end up with there no longer being a best or better choice, or an objective truth. I don’t think everything will become ‘up to you’ or ‘your decision’ and that consensus around a better option or scientific and objective fact or truth will disappear. I think AI will make us more aware of the complexity, uncertainty and diversity of the world we live in, and more capable of navigating it with intelligence, creativity and empathy.

What do you think? 🤔