• Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
  • Posts
  • Gemini: While Rumble's terms of service officially forbid racism and antisemitism, it has been criticized for allowing extremism, bigotry, and conspiracy theories to flourish.

Gemini: While Rumble's terms of service officially forbid racism and antisemitism, it has been criticized for allowing extremism, bigotry, and conspiracy theories to flourish.

The politics of demonization has a resilient and scalable distribution channel, directly fueling the online radicalization that has been linked to real-world violence.

Author

Pascal Hetzscholdt
August 15, 2025


This is a continuation of the following post:

·

14 AUG

The Digital Infrastructure of Hate: Facilitators, Consequences, and a Framework for Action

Chapter 7: The Political Application of the Alt-Tech Ecosystem

by Gemini 2.5 Pro, Deep Research

The development of a resilient, parallel "alt-tech" infrastructure, as detailed in the first part of this report, is not merely a technical phenomenon. It is the critical enabler of a specific and potent political project. This ecosystem provides the digital sanctuary and amplification engine for a network of political actors, ideological architects, and activist groups who share a common goal: the disruption of established democratic norms and institutions. This section will analyze the symbiotic relationship between the online activities of the Trump administration, the ideological frameworks developed by organizations like the Heritage Foundation, and the mobilization of groups such as the Proud Boys and Christian Nationalists. It will demonstrate how the rhetoric of political leaders, the policy blueprints of think tanks, and the actions of extremist groups converge and are facilitated within this specialized digital sphere.

7.1 The Rhetorical Engine: Trump's Politics of Demonization and Norm Destruction

The political power of Donald Trump is inextricably linked to a unique and consistent rhetorical signature, one that has been described by researchers as a combination of disruption, demonization, deliverance, and norm destruction.1 This style, characterized by its seemingly spontaneous, evidence-flouting, and institution-disdaining nature, proved highly effective in certifying his authenticity as a "change candidate" to a constituency eager for the disruption of conventional politics.1

A core component of this rhetoric is the politics of demonization, a strategy that wields a toxic "us vs. them" agenda to scapegoat and dehumanize entire groups of people.5 This involves parsing individuals into "winners" and "losers" and demonizing those with whom he disagrees.2 During his candidacy and presidency, this aggressive, divisive, and dehumanizing language was frequently directed at racial, ethnic, and religious minorities, as well as the news media and political opponents.6 This strategy of "othering" creates a sense of crisis and depicts specific communities as an existential threat, a tactic observed in his rhetoric regarding Muslims and Mexicans.7By framing political opponents and entire social groups as illegitimate enemies, this rhetoric erodes the basis for democratic discourse and normalizes hostility.8

This rhetorical approach is amplified and disseminated through a dedicated online apparatus. After being deplatformed from mainstream sites like Twitter and Facebook following the January 6th Capitol attack, Trump's primary megaphone became Truth Social, a platform created by his Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG).9 Truth Social was explicitly designed to be a "free speech haven," operating with minimal content moderation and providing an unfiltered channel for his messaging.10 The platform's very existence is a direct result of the alt-tech infrastructure stack; it is hosted by RightForge, a company that markets itself as a "cancel-proof" service for conservatives.13

Truth Social, in turn, is hosted on the video platform Rumble, which has become a central hub for right-wing and far-right content creators, many of whom were banned from YouTube.16 While Rumble's terms of service officially forbid racism and antisemitism, it has been criticized for allowing extremism, bigotry, and conspiracy theories to flourish.18 This creates a powerful, multi-layered ecosystem where Trump's rhetoric can be broadcast on Truth Social, amplified through Rumble's video infrastructure, and then disseminated across a network of ideologically aligned users, effectively bypassing the content moderation of mainstream platforms.9 This digital apparatus ensures that the politics of demonization has a resilient and scalable distribution channel, directly fueling the online radicalization that has been linked to real-world violence.6

7.2 The Ideological Architects: The Heritage Foundation's Projects for Power

While Trump's rhetoric provides the political energy, the Heritage Foundation and its allies provide the intellectual and strategic framework for translating that energy into a concrete governing agenda. Through initiatives like Project 2025 and Project Esther, the foundation has developed detailed blueprints for a radical restructuring of the American government and civil society, with specific strategies for leveraging online tools to achieve their objectives.

Project 2025: A Blueprint for Autocracy

Project 2025 is a comprehensive, 920-page "Mandate for Leadership" developed by the Heritage Foundation and over 100 conservative partner organizations.23 It serves as a detailed playbook for a potential conservative administration to consolidate executive power and systematically dismantle what it terms the "Administrative State".26 The project's four pillars include the policy book, a "conservative LinkedIn" to vet and place loyal personnel across the federal government, a training academy for these appointees, and a playbook of executive orders to be implemented on day one.27

The project's goals are sweeping and radical. They include gutting civil rights enforcement by eliminating the use of "disparate impact" analysis; weaponizing the Department of Justice to prosecute "anti-white racism"; banning diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs; and ending federal efforts to combat online disinformation.25It also calls for a nationwide ban on abortion, in part by enforcing the 19th-century Comstock Act to prosecute the mailing of abortion pills, and a reversal of the FDA's approval of mifepristone.23 The project is explicitly designed to enable an incoming administration to bypass Congress and implement much of its agenda through executive action alone.24

The dissemination of Project 2025's ideology is an active online campaign. Civil rights organizations like the NAACP have identified the project as a profound threat and have developed social media toolkits to educate and mobilize their communities in opposition.32 The Heritage Foundation itself promotes the project as a way to "institutionalize Trumpism" and has received endorsements from Trump for its work.26This online battle over the narrative of Project 2025 highlights the digital sphere as a key front in the effort to prepare the ground for its implementation.

Project Esther: Weaponizing Antisemitism to Silence Dissent

A more targeted and insidious initiative is Project Esther, launched by the Heritage Foundation in October 2024.33 While billing itself as a "National Strategy to Combat Antisemitism," the project's primary goal is to discredit and dismantle the pro-Palestinian solidarity movement in the United States.35 It does this by framing a wide range of critics of Israeli government policy as part of a global "Hamas Support Network" that poses a threat to America itself.33

Project Esther outlines a strategy of "lawfare," criminalization, and censorship. Its stated goals include deporting non-citizen students and faculty involved in pro-Palestinian activism, revoking visas, cutting federal funding to universities deemed tolerant of such activism, and designating civil society groups like Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine as terrorist-linked.33

Crucially, Project Esther details a sophisticated online strategy to achieve these ends. The plan calls for purging social media of alleged antisemitic content, monitoring the social media of pro-Palestinian activists, and using online surveillance to identify foreign students for deportation.36 A leaked pitch deck revealed an even more granular online strategy, including a plan to identify and target Wikipedia editors who publish content the group deems antisemitic, using tactics such as creating fake "sock puppet" accounts to provoke reactions and expose identities.33 This initiative represents a clear and deliberate plan to weaponize online platforms and infrastructure not to combat genuine antisemitism—critics note it exclusively targets the left while ignoring right-wing antisemitism—but to silence political dissent and enforce a specific ideological agenda.33

7.3 The Digital Soldiers: Proud Boys and Christian Nationalists

The political project enabled by the alt-tech ecosystem requires not just a leader and an ideology, but also a mobilized base. Far-right groups like the Proud Boys and the broader Christian Nationalist movement serve this function, acting as the on-the-ground and online "soldiers" of the movement. Their organization, recruitment, and radicalization are deeply intertwined with the digital infrastructure that supports them.

The Proud Boys: From Online Trolling to Seditious Conspiracy

The Proud Boys are a far-right, neo-fascist organization that promotes and engages in political violence.40 Describing themselves as "Western chauvinists," their ideology is a mix of anti-immigrant, anti-feminist, Islamophobic, and transphobic beliefs, and they have become notorious for violent street brawls with left-wing opponents.41 The group's trajectory has been one of escalating extremism, culminating in the conviction of its leaders for seditious conspiracy for their role in the January 6th Capitol attack.41

The Proud Boys are a movement born of and sustained by the internet.43 After being banned from mainstream platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube for their promotion of violence, the group migrated to the alt-tech ecosystem, embracing platforms like Parler, Gab, and especially Telegram.40 These platforms became their primary hubs for recruitment, organizing, and the dissemination of propaganda, often hidden behind layers of memes and irony.43

The group's connection to Donald Trump was cemented during a 2020 presidential debate when he told them to "stand back and stand by." This statement was immediately interpreted as a presidential endorsement, giving the group a massive public relations boost and driving a surge in online interest and engagement on their alt-tech channels.45 This moment perfectly illustrates the feedback loop: presidential rhetoric amplified online, energizing an extremist group that then uses its online platforms to organize for political action, including the violence of January 6th.

Christian Nationalism: A Theocratic Mandate for the Movement

Providing a broader ideological and spiritual justification for this political project is Christian Nationalism. This is the belief that the United States was founded as a Christian nation and that its laws and institutions should reflect a specific interpretation of Christian values.46 This framework often includes assumptions of nativism, white supremacy, patriarchy, and divine sanction for authoritarian control.49

Christian Nationalism was a highly visible and motivating force at the January 6th insurrection, with participants engaging in public prayer, displaying Christian symbols, and framing their actions in the language of spiritual warfare.50 The movement is deeply intertwined with support for Donald Trump, with many adherents viewing him as a heroic, divinely appointed figure fighting a cosmic battle against evil.47

Like other far-right movements, Christian Nationalism thrives in the alt-tech ecosystem. Platforms like Gab, whose founder Andrew Torba describes his mission as building a "parallel Christian economy," serve as digital havens where Christian Nationalist rhetoric can flourish unchallenged.53 This online environment allows for the fusion of religious and national identities, creating a powerful in-group of "true Americans" and demonizing all others as illegitimate outsiders.49 The intersection is explicit: analysis of Proud Boys' online communications shows their message is infused with religious and nationalist symbols, and members have been photographed kneeling in prayer at MAGA rallies, blending the identities of political foot soldier and holy warrior.51

7.4 Conclusion: A Unified Political-Technical Apparatus

The online activities of the Trump administration, the Heritage Foundation, the Proud Boys, and Christian Nationalists are not isolated phenomena. They are interconnected components of a unified political-technical apparatus. Trump's demonizing rhetoric creates the political climate and provides the high-level narrative. The Heritage Foundation's projects offer the detailed policy roadmap for a post-democratic government. The Proud Boys and Christian Nationalists provide the mobilized, ideologically-driven base.

This entire operation is built upon and sustained by the alt-tech infrastructure stack. Platforms like Truth Social and Rumble, hosted by "cancel-proof" companies like RightForge, provide the essential services of amplification and communication. They create insulated echo chambers where demonizing rhetoric is normalized, radical policy goals are socialized, and extremist groups can organize and recruit with impunity. This ecosystem represents the practical application of the infrastructure of hate, transforming it from a collection of fringe websites into a formidable engine for a cohesive and dangerous political movement.

Works cited

  1. Disruption, Demonization, Deliverance, and Norm Destruction: The Rhetorical Signature of Donald J. Trump | The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/rhetorical-signature-of-donald-j-trump/

  2. Disruption, Demonization, Deliverance, and Norm Destruction: The Rhetorical Signature of Donald J. Trump | The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/publication/disruption-demonization-deliverance-and-norm-destruction-the-rhetorical-signature-of-donald-j-trump/

  3. Disruption, Demonization, Deliverance, and Norm Destruction: The Rhetorical Signature of Donald J. Trump - Political Science Quarterly, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.psqonline.org/article.cfm?IDArticle=19720

  4. Winter 2017–18: Disruption, Demonization, Deliverance, and Norm Destruction: The Rhetorical Signature of Donald J. Trump - Political Science Quarterly, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.psqonline.org/article.cfm?IDArticle=19722

  5. 'Politics of demonization' breeding division and fear - Amnesty International, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2017/02/amnesty-international-annual-report-201617/

  6. Donald Trump: Aggressive Rhetoric and Political Violence - Perspectives on Terrorism, accessed August 13, 2025, https://pt.icct.nl/article/donald-trump-aggressive-rhetoric-and-political-violence

  7. The "Othering" of America: How the Strategic use of Crisis and Ressentiment Succeeded in the Trump era - The Aquila Digital Community, accessed August 13, 2025, https://aquila.usm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3286&context=dissertations

  8. What Does It Mean to Reject Demonization? - Justia's Verdict, accessed August 13, 2025, https://verdict.justia.com/2024/07/18/what-does-it-mean-to-reject-demonization

  9. Revealed: Just one in four Trump-endorsed candidates using Truth Social actively, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.cjr.org/investigation/trump-truth-social-struggles.php

  10. The Moderation FAQ - Truth Social Help Center, accessed August 13, 2025, https://help.truthsocial.com/moderation/moderation-faq/

  11. Exploring the Truth Social App Features, Impact, and User Insights, accessed August 13, 2025, https://performanceappraisal.mituniversity.edu.in/Documents/section2/news.php?news=866002

  12. Truth Social Case Study - DBA, accessed August 13, 2025, https://dbadbadba.com/case_studies/truth_social

  13. RightForge - Wikipedia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RightForge

  14. RightForge Becomes A Host For TRUTH Social, Provides A Server That Accommodates 75 Million Users - VOI, accessed August 13, 2025, https://voi.id/en/technology/98163

  15. Trump's plaything Truth Social is reportedly about to collapse. Why am I not surprised? | Arwa Mahdawi | The Guardian, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/aug/30/trump-plaything-truth-social-reportedly-about-to-collapse-why-am-i-not-surprised

  16. Truth Social host Rumble weighs near $1.2 billion deal for Northern Data | Reuters.pdf

  17. The Radical Right Has Found a New Home: Rumble - Democratic Erosion Consortium, accessed August 13, 2025, https://democratic-erosion.org/2022/04/20/the-radical-right-has-found-a-new-home-rumble/

  18. Rumble (company) - Wikipedia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumble_(company)

  19. Rumble - ISD, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.isdglobal.org/explainers/rumble/

  20. Revealed: Republican debate broadcast partner fueled by misogyny and extremism, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/24/republican-debate-livestream-rumble-misogyny-extremism

  21. RNC's livestreaming partner for the GOP debate is a haven for disinformation and extremism, accessed August 13, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/republican-debate-livestream-rumble-disinformation-extremism-a6e627ac88463f9f83ada062ea83c6db

  22. Rumble wants your attention - Columbia Journalism Review, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.cjr.org/tow_center/rumble-wants-your-attention.php

  23. What is Trump's Project 2025?, accessed August 13, 2025, https://meng.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/meng.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/Stop%20Project%202025%20Task%20Force%27s%20Project%202025%20Executive%20Summary.pdf

  24. The People's Guide to Project 2025 - Democracy Forward, accessed August 13, 2025, https://democracyforward.org/the-peoples-guide-to-project-2025/

  25. Project 2025: What's At Stake for Civil Rights, accessed August 13, 2025, https://civilrights.org/project2025/

  26. Project 2025 - Wikipedia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

  27. Project 2025 | The Heritage Foundation, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.heritage.org/conservatism/commentary/project-2025

  28. Project 2025: What a second Trump term could mean for media and technology policies, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/project-2025-what-a-second-trump-term-could-mean-for-media-and-technology-policies/

  29. What is Project 2025? What to know about the conservative blueprint for a second Trump administration - CBS News, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-is-project-2025-trump-conservative-blueprint-heritage-foundation/

  30. Project 2025 - PEN America, accessed August 13, 2025, https://pen.org/report/project-2025/

  31. Project 2025, Explained | American Civil Liberties Union, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.aclu.org/project-2025-explained

  32. PROJECT 2025 SOCIAL MEDIA TOOLKIT - NAACP, accessed August 13, 2025, https://naacp.org/sites/default/files/documents/PROJECT%202025%20SOCIAL%20MEDIA%20TOOLKIT.pdf

  33. Project Esther - Wikipedia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Esther

  34. Project Esther and the weaponisation of Zionism | Opinions - Al Jazeera, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2025/5/19/project-esther-and-the-weaponisation-of-zionism

  35. Project Esther: A Nexus Project Briefing, accessed August 13, 2025, https://nexusproject.us/nexus-resources/project-esther-a-nexus-project-briefing/

  36. Project Esther: A Dangerous Blueprint for Censoring Palestine ..., accessed August 13, 2025, https://ca.cair.com/updates/project-esther-a-dangerous-blueprint-for-censoring-palestine/

  37. What is Project Esther, the playbook against pro-Palestine movement in US? - Al Jazeera, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/5/31/what-is-project-esther-the-playbook-against-pro-palestine-movement-in-us

  38. Rejecting Project Esther: Understanding Christian and White Nationalism as Racism and Antisemitism | Contending Modernities, accessed August 13, 2025, https://contendingmodernities.nd.edu/global-currents/jvp-rejecting-project-esther/

  39. Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2025-01-15/In the media, accessed August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2025-01-15/In_the_media

  40. Proud Boys - Wikipedia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proud_Boys

  41. The Proud Boys | Program on Extremism - The George Washington University, accessed August 13, 2025, https://extremism.gwu.edu/proud-boys

  42. The Proud Boys: Chauvinist poster child of far-right extremism - ECPS, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.populismstudies.org/the-proud-boys-chauvinist-poster-child-of-far-right-extremism/

  43. Pride & Prejudice: The Violent Evolution of the Proud Boys - Combating Terrorism Center, accessed August 13, 2025, https://ctc.westpoint.edu/pride-prejudice-the-violent-evolution-of-the-proud-boys/

  44. Proud Boys - ISD, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.isdglobal.org/explainers/proud-boys/

  45. "Stand Back and Stand By:" The Proud Boys' Online Reaction - ISD, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.isdglobal.org/digital_dispatches/part-i-how-the-proud-boys-reacted-to-trumps-mention-of-them-in-the-first-presidential-debate/

  46. A History of Christian Nationalism | Throughline - YouTube, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5knP1ju2xJk

  47. What is Christian nationalism and why it raises concerns about ..., accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/what-is-christian-nationalism-and-why-it-raises-concerns-about-threats-to-democracy

  48. White Christian Nationalism - ST. THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.saintthomasdenver.org/white-christian-nationalism

  49. White Christian Nationalism after the January 6th Insurrection GiveSendGo's Online Pulpit - Middlebury College, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.middlebury.edu/institute/media/27423

  50. "Confronting the Conflation: The Use of Christian Nationalist Rhetoric" by Sophia Barnes - Digital Commons @ West Chester University, accessed August 13, 2025, https://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/all_theses/307/

  51. CHRISTIAN NATIONALISM AND THE CAPITOL INSURRECTION - GovInfo, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-J6-DOC-CTRL0000062431/pdf/GPO-J6-DOC-CTRL0000062431.pdf

  52. "Rev." Donald Trump and the Christian Right — A Secular Transformation of the Great Awakening Heritage - Digital Commons @ Trinity, accessed August 13, 2025, https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1072&context=polysci_faculty

  53. Gab provides online home for far-right groups and supporters, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.splcenter.org/resources/hatewatch/gab-provides-online-home-far-right-groups/

  54. Inside the Fraught Effort to Create a Christian Nationalist Internet | Pulitzer Center, accessed August 13, 2025, https://pulitzercenter.org/stories/inside-fraught-effort-create-christian-nationalist-internet

  55. Words and Attitudes of the Heart: The Emotional Content of Christian ..., accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/7/825

  56. Proud Boys, Nationalism, and Religion - Philosophy Documentation Center, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.pdcnet.org/collection-anonymous/pdf2image?pdfname=jrv_2021_0009_0001_0012_0032.pdf&file_type=pdf