Asking AI whether digital infrastructure should be more expensive to an end user than the valuable knowledge that can either be accessed via that infrastructure or is traveling across it.

Asking AI services: Make a decision and accompany it with an elaborate essay as to whether digital infrastructure should be more expensive to an end user (individual consumer, educational institution, business or government) or the valuable knowledge that can either be accessed via that infrastructure or is traveling across it.

ChatGPT-4o’s answer:
Decision: The Valuable Knowledge Should Be Priced Higher than Digital Infrastructure

Argument Summary: Digital infrastructure—networks, platforms, and cloud storage solutions—serves as the means by which knowledge is transmitted, accessed, and utilized. However, the primary value does not lie in the infrastructure itself but in the content and data it facilitates access to. Pricing knowledge and data as the primary value driver, rather than the infrastructure, aligns with the principles of a knowledge-driven economy, fosters innovation, and democratizes access to essential digital tools.

Essay

Introduction: In the digital era, infrastructure—comprising data centers, network frameworks, and cloud solutions—plays a critical role in connecting people to valuable knowledge and resources. Knowledge, in this context, includes everything from educational content and proprietary information to research findings, artistic works, and personalized data insights. While infrastructure enables access to knowledge, the core value lies in the content that individuals, businesses, and governments utilize to drive growth, innovation, and development. This essay will argue that the end users should bear a higher cost for accessing and utilizing knowledge, rather than infrastructure, to support equitable digital access and maximize the impact of knowledge on society.

1. The Role of Infrastructure as an Enabler of Knowledge:

Digital infrastructure forms the backbone of information dissemination and access. Platforms, broadband networks, servers, and cloud systems are the tools through which individuals can interact with data, insights, and digital content. However, infrastructure is only as valuable as the purpose it serves—transporting and hosting knowledge. By itself, it is merely a means to an end, a conduit through which the true value, knowledge, can flow. For instance, a high-speed internet connection is invaluable, but only because it allows access to diverse digital resources, from research databases to streaming services and educational materials. In the absence of content or knowledge to access, infrastructure loses its significance.

2. Knowledge as the True Value Driver in a Digital Economy:

Knowledge forms the basis of decision-making, progress, and creativity. In today’s economy, data-driven insights, research outputs, and specialized content are indispensable assets. Companies, for instance, leverage proprietary knowledge and data to refine products, enhance customer experiences, and make strategic decisions. Educational institutions depend on digital knowledge resources to expand learning horizons, from online courses to virtual labs and libraries.

From a value perspective, knowledge—be it scientific research, business intelligence, or cultural media—has inherent worth. Pricing knowledge to reflect its value would ensure creators, researchers, and intellectual contributors receive fair compensation for their work, incentivizing the continuous production of high-quality content. When knowledge is valued higher, it stimulates content creation, fosters innovation, and maintains an economy that rewards intellectual and creative contributions.

3. Potential Societal and Economic Impacts of Making Infrastructure Expensive:

If digital infrastructure becomes more costly, society risks creating barriers to access for economically disadvantaged individuals, communities, and small businesses. Expensive digital infrastructure could exacerbate inequalities by disproportionately affecting those unable to afford high-speed internet, cloud storage, or robust digital tools. For educational institutions, particularly those in under-resourced areas, the rising cost of infrastructure would directly limit access to the tools students and educators need to thrive in a digital learning environment.

Moreover, businesses, especially startups and small enterprises, may struggle to access the digital tools required to compete in a rapidly digitizing economy. Raising infrastructure costs would suppress the entrepreneurial spirit that digital infrastructure often enables by providing affordable means for entry and scalability. By maintaining affordable infrastructure, we support broader participation in the digital economy, empowering all segments of society with the ability to innovate, compete, and grow.

4. The Case for Valuing Knowledge Appropriately:

Valuing knowledge appropriately encourages fair compensation for content creators, researchers, and intellectual contributors. A price model centered on knowledge also promotes transparency and efficiency; consumers and businesses alike pay for the specific content or data they value, rather than shouldering infrastructure costs that may not directly align with the value they derive. Knowledge pricing can be flexible, reflecting the market worth of various content types. For example, specialized knowledge in niche fields could be priced higher than widely available, general content, giving consumers more options to access knowledge tailored to their needs.

For educational institutions, a knowledge-focused pricing model could facilitate partnerships with content providers that make specialized resources more affordable. Businesses that rely on proprietary knowledge for competitive advantage would find greater benefit in paying a premium for high-quality data and insights, rather than facing indiscriminate infrastructure costs that do not correlate with their value use. Governments could similarly prioritize access to strategic knowledge—whether in public health, environmental science, or national security—without excessive infrastructure-related expenses.

5. Addressing Potential Criticisms of Knowledge-Based Pricing Models:

Critics might argue that placing a premium on knowledge could reduce access for individuals who cannot afford to pay for valuable information. This concern, while valid, can be mitigated through subsidies, open-access models for foundational knowledge, and strategic partnerships between governments and knowledge providers. Many public-sector initiatives already exist to make essential knowledge freely available, from publicly funded research to educational resources. By focusing pricing efforts on proprietary and high-value knowledge, essential information remains accessible to the public, while specialized knowledge markets can flourish.

Another concern is that knowledge pricing may lead to data monopolies, where only those with the financial capacity can access critical insights. However, proper regulation, oversight, and a balance between open access and paid content could prevent monopolization while preserving equitable access. In sectors like education and healthcare, subsidies and open-access policies can ensure knowledge-based pricing does not restrict vital resources from those who need them most.

Conclusion:

In a digital landscape where knowledge fuels growth, innovation, and progress, it is rational to place a higher price on the knowledge that travels across digital infrastructure rather than the infrastructure itself. Affordable infrastructure ensures universal access to the digital economy's tools and pathways, promoting inclusivity and supporting social and economic development. Knowledge, as the valuable asset that drives demand for infrastructure, should be priced in a way that reflects its true value, ensuring that creators and intellectual contributors are compensated for their work while maintaining a balance of access. This approach upholds the principles of a knowledge-driven economy, enabling digital inclusivity, fostering intellectual and creative innovation, and maintaining an accessible, equitable digital ecosystem.

Perplexity’s answer:
Digital infrastructure should be less expensive to end users compared to the valuable knowledge accessed or transmitted through it. This approach maximizes the societal benefits of digital infrastructure while fostering innovation, economic growth, and equal access to information.

The Case for Affordable Digital Infrastructure

Promoting Universal Access

Making digital infrastructure more affordable for end users is crucial for promoting universal access to information and services. By reducing the cost barrier, we can ensure that individuals, educational institutions, businesses, and governments of all sizes and economic backgrounds can participate in the digital economy. This is particularly important for emerging market economies and low-income developing countries, which require significant investment to achieve affordable universal broadband.

Fostering Innovation and Economic Growth

Affordable digital infrastructure acts as a catalyst for innovation and economic growth. When access costs are lower, more individuals and organizations can leverage digital technologies to create new products, services, and business models. This increased participation in the digital economy can lead to job creation, improved productivity, and overall economic development.

Enhancing Education and Skills Development

Educational institutions benefit greatly from affordable digital infrastructure. It allows them to provide students with access to a wealth of online resources, facilitate remote learning, and prepare students for the digital workforce. By making digital infrastructure more accessible, we can help bridge the digital divide and ensure that all students have equal opportunities to develop crucial digital skills.

Improving Government Services and Efficiency

Governments can leverage affordable digital infrastructure to enhance public services and increase operational efficiency. Digital public infrastructure enables the delivery of e-government services, improves data exchange between agencies, and facilitates better decision-making through data analytics. By reducing the cost of digital infrastructure, governments can allocate more resources to developing and implementing these valuable services.

The Value of Knowledge and Information

While digital infrastructure should be affordable, the knowledge and information transmitted through it can command higher value. This approach recognizes the importance of content creators, researchers, and innovators who generate valuable intellectual property.

Incentivizing Knowledge Creation

By allowing for higher pricing of valuable knowledge and information, we create incentives for individuals and organizations to invest in research, development, and content creation. This ensures a continuous flow of high-quality information and innovations that drive societal progress.

Supporting Quality and Reliability

Placing higher value on knowledge and information encourages the development of reliable, well-researched, and high-quality content. This is particularly important in an era of misinformation and low-quality content proliferation.

Enabling Sustainable Business Models

Content creators, educational institutions, and businesses that rely on producing and disseminating valuable knowledge need sustainable revenue models. By allowing for higher pricing of their intellectual property, we ensure the continued production of valuable content and services.

Balancing Affordability and Value

To strike the right balance between affordable infrastructure and valuable knowledge, we should consider the following approaches:

1. Public-Private Partnerships: Governments can collaborate with private sector entities to invest in digital infrastructure, reducing the cost burden on end users while ensuring high-quality service delivery.

2. Tiered Pricing Models: Implement pricing structures that offer basic access at low costs while providing premium content or services at higher price points.

3. Open Access Initiatives: Promote open access to certain types of knowledge, particularly in education and research, while allowing for commercial models in other sectors.

4. Digital Literacy Programs: Invest in education and training to help users maximize the value they derive from digital infrastructure and accessed knowledge.

5. Innovation in Content Delivery: Encourage new models of content creation and distribution that balance affordability with fair compensation for creators.

Conclusion

By prioritizing affordable digital infrastructure while recognizing the value of knowledge and information, we can create a digital ecosystem that promotes inclusivity, innovation, and economic growth. This approach ensures that the foundational elements of the digital world are accessible to all, while still incentivizing the creation and dissemination of high-quality content and services. As we continue to invest in and develop digital public infrastructure, maintaining this balance will be crucial for realizing the full potential of our increasingly digital society.

Gemini’s answer:
The question of whether the cost burden should fall more heavily on the digital infrastructure itself or the knowledge it facilitates is a complex one, with valid arguments on both sides. However, in light of the global trend towards knowledge-based economies and the increasing reliance on digital infrastructure for societal progress, the decision should lean towards prioritizing the affordability of access to knowledge.

One of the primary reasons for this is the democratizing potential of digital infrastructure. By making knowledge more accessible, it empowers individuals and communities, regardless of their socioeconomic background, to learn, innovate, and participate in the global economy. When the cost of infrastructure outweighs the cost of knowledge, it creates a digital divide, hindering progress and perpetuating inequality.  

Moreover, the value of knowledge is inherently intangible and difficult to quantify. While the costs of building and maintaining digital infrastructure are tangible, the benefits that arise from the exchange of knowledge are far-reaching and often immeasurable. Knowledge fuels innovation, drives economic growth, and contributes to social progress. By prioritizing the affordability of knowledge, we invest in the long-term development of society.  

However, it is also important to acknowledge the significant costs associated with building and maintaining digital infrastructure. These costs include the development and deployment of hardware, software, and networks, as well as ongoing maintenance and upgrades. These costs are necessary to ensure the reliability, security, and scalability of the infrastructure.

Therefore, a balanced approach is needed. While prioritizing the affordability of knowledge is essential, it is also crucial to ensure that digital infrastructure is adequately funded and maintained. This can be achieved through a combination of public and private investment, as well as innovative financing models.

In conclusion, the decision to prioritize the affordability of knowledge over the cost of digital infrastructure is a strategic one that aligns with the values of equity, progress, and innovation. By making knowledge more accessible, we empower individuals and communities, foster economic growth, and contribute to a more just and equitable society.  

Follow up question for AI services: As such, if anyone makes a plea for valuable knowledge to be free, shouldn't the access to that knowledge via the digital infrastructure required at least be free too?

ChatGPT-4o’s answer:
If we argue that valuable knowledge should be free, it's indeed logical to question whether the infrastructure enabling access to that knowledge should also be free, or at least highly affordable. However, while the two concepts are related, their economic and practical dynamics differ. Here’s a deeper look into why even if knowledge is made freely accessible, digital infrastructure might not necessarily follow the same model, although it should ideally be kept affordable.

1. The Distinct Economic Models of Knowledge and Infrastructure:

• Knowledge as a Public Good: Valuable knowledge, such as educational content, scientific research, and even certain cultural assets, can be argued to have characteristics of a public good—non-rivalrous and non-excludable in nature. Once knowledge is created, sharing it does not diminish its availability for others. This is why calls for free access to valuable knowledge are often rooted in its public utility, especially for knowledge that can improve health, education, and overall quality of life.

• Infrastructure as a Resource-Intensive Investment: Digital infrastructure, on the other hand, requires ongoing investment, maintenance, and resources, such as physical hardware, energy, and technical support. Unlike knowledge, infrastructure is rivalrous—bandwidth, server space, and data processing capacities are finite and can become congested. Therefore, while knowledge can be replicated without diminishing its value, infrastructure requires a continuous influx of capital to remain functional, reliable, and scalable. Making infrastructure entirely free is challenging due to these inherent costs.

2. The Feasibility of Subsidized or Tiered Infrastructure Access:

If the goal is to provide free access to valuable knowledge, an effective approach would be to subsidize or offer affordable tiers of infrastructure specifically for accessing that knowledge. Here are several approaches that could strike a balance:

• Government and Public Subsidies: Governments could play a crucial role in funding or subsidizing the infrastructure required for public access to valuable knowledge. For example, libraries, public Wi-Fi zones, and educational institutions could provide free or low-cost access to digital networks, ensuring that essential knowledge is accessible to everyone.

• Tiered Access Models: Another approach could involve tiered pricing where basic internet and platform access for essential services (like education or healthcare) is free or subsidized, while premium services and additional bandwidth are paid. This model would ensure that fundamental access remains affordable, while users pay for high-bandwidth, resource-intensive services.

• Collaboration with Private Sector and Non-Profits: Private companies could partner with non-profits and governments to offer subsidized access for specific purposes, such as educational platforms or research databases, while benefiting from tax incentives or corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs.

3. Ensuring Sustainable Access Without Compromising Infrastructure Quality:

Even if knowledge were free, providing completely free infrastructure access could strain resources and potentially degrade service quality over time. For instance, an entirely free, high-bandwidth network could face congestion, maintenance issues, or underinvestment, affecting the quality and reliability of access. Instead, sustainably funded or tiered access ensures that infrastructure providers can maintain service quality, expand capacity, and innovate without compromising accessibility.

4. Ethical and Equitable Considerations for Knowledge Access:

If valuable knowledge is made free, it is imperative to address the digital divide—differences in access to digital infrastructure that disproportionately impact lower-income populations, rural areas, and developing countries. Ensuring affordable or free infrastructure access in these contexts would align with the ethical imperative of democratizing knowledge access. Here, governments, international organizations, and private entities could work together to provide free or subsidized digital infrastructure as part of a global initiative to close the digital divide.

5. Innovation and Flexibility in Funding Models:

The digital infrastructure landscape benefits from innovative funding models that support free knowledge access. For instance, some tech companies have piloted zero-rating models where access to specific educational or health content is provided without data charges. While not a perfect solution—due to potential issues around content neutrality—it demonstrates how creative funding can enhance access to free knowledge without necessarily making the entire infrastructure free.

Conclusion

The goal of universal, free access to valuable knowledge can be ethically compelling and socially beneficial. However, making digital infrastructure completely free may be less feasible, as it requires substantial and ongoing financial investment. The ideal compromise is a model where basic infrastructure for accessing essential knowledge is kept affordable and widely accessible through public subsidies, tiered pricing, and partnerships, while infrastructure providers still have viable revenue models to ensure sustainable, high-quality service. In this way, access to free knowledge can be supported without compromising the stability and quality of digital infrastructure.


Perplexity’s answer:
While the sentiment of making valuable knowledge freely accessible is admirable, there are several important factors to consider when evaluating whether digital infrastructure should also be free:

Economic Realities of Digital Infrastructure

Costs of Development and Maintenance

Digital infrastructure requires significant investment to build, maintain, and upgrade. This includes hardware costs, software development, security measures, and ongoing operational expenses. Making this infrastructure entirely free would pose substantial financial challenges for providers.

Incentives for Innovation

Charging for digital infrastructure creates incentives for companies to innovate and improve their services. This competition drives advancements in speed, reliability, and features that benefit end users.

Balancing Access and Sustainability

Tiered Access Models

A more viable approach may be tiered access models, where basic infrastructure access is provided at low or no cost, while premium features or higher bandwidth come at a price. This allows for broader access while still generating revenue to support the system.

Public-Private Partnerships

Governments can collaborate with private companies to subsidize infrastructure costs in underserved areas or for specific groups (e.g., students, low-income communities). This helps expand access without making the entire system free.

The Value of "Free" Knowledge

Hidden Costs of Free Services

Even when knowledge or services are ostensibly free, there are often hidden costs in terms of data collection, advertising, or limited functionality. Truly free infrastructure might come with similar trade-offs.

Quality and Reliability Concerns

Entirely free infrastructure might struggle to maintain the quality and reliability necessary for accessing and transmitting valuable knowledge effectively.

Alternative Approaches

Open Source Solutions

Promoting open source infrastructure solutions can reduce costs and increase accessibility without making everything entirely free.

Digital Literacy Programs

Investing in digital literacy alongside infrastructure development ensures that people can effectively utilize available resources, maximizing the value of both free and paid services.

Conclusion

While making valuable knowledge freely accessible is a worthy goal, the digital infrastructure required to access that knowledge involves real costs and economic considerations. A nuanced approach that balances accessibility, sustainability, and quality is likely more practical than making all digital infrastructure entirely free. This could involve a combination of tiered pricing, public-private partnerships, and targeted subsidies to ensure broad access while maintaining the economic viability of the infrastructure.

Gemini’s answer:
The assertion that if valuable knowledge should be free, then the digital infrastructure required to access it should also be free, raises a valid point. However, it is important to consider the complexities involved in providing and maintaining digital infrastructure.

While the ideal scenario would be free access to both knowledge and the infrastructure, the reality is that significant costs are associated with building, maintaining, and securing digital infrastructure. These costs include hardware, software, network infrastructure, energy consumption, and cybersecurity measures.

To ensure the sustainability and quality of digital infrastructure, it is necessary to have a funding mechanism. This could involve a combination of public investment, private sector contributions, and user fees. However, it is crucial to strike a balance between ensuring affordability and generating sufficient revenue to maintain the infrastructure.

One potential solution is to explore tiered pricing models that differentiate between essential services and premium features. For example, basic internet access could be provided at a low cost or even for free, while advanced services and high-bandwidth usage could be subject to higher fees.

Ultimately, the goal should be to maximize access to knowledge while ensuring the long-term viability of digital infrastructure. By carefully considering the costs and benefits, and by implementing innovative funding models, it is possible to create a digital ecosystem that benefits everyone.

Follow up question for AI services: But if you read this article “Focusing on Value — 102 Things Journal Publishers Do”, isn’t it true that the robust creation and dissemination of valuable knowledge can be quite costly too?

ChatGPT-4o’s answer:
Indeed, the creation and dissemination of valuable knowledge entail significant costs. The article "Focusing on Value — 102 Things Journal Publishers Do" outlines numerous activities that journal publishers undertake to ensure the quality, accessibility, and integrity of scholarly content.

Scholarly Kitchen

Key Activities and Their Associated Costs:

1. Editorial Management: Overseeing the peer review process, coordinating with authors, and ensuring the accuracy and relevance of content require substantial time and expertise.

2. Production Services: This includes copyediting, typesetting, formatting, and designing publications to meet professional standards.

3. Distribution and Access: Maintaining digital platforms, managing subscriptions, and ensuring content is accessible to a global audience involve ongoing technical and administrative efforts.

4. Marketing and Outreach: Promoting publications to reach the intended audience and maximize impact necessitates strategic marketing initiatives.

5. Archiving and Preservation: Ensuring the long-term preservation of scholarly content for future reference and research is a critical responsibility.

These activities highlight that producing and disseminating high-quality knowledge is resource-intensive. While the digital infrastructure facilitates access, the value-added services provided by publishers are essential for maintaining the standards and credibility of scholarly communication. Therefore, both the infrastructure and the content creation processes incur significant costs that need to be considered when discussing access and pricing models.

Perplexity’s answer:
You're right to point out that the creation and dissemination of valuable knowledge can indeed be quite costly. The article you mention, "Focusing on Value — 102 Things Journal Publishers Do," highlights the numerous activities and services that publishers provide, which contribute to the overall cost of producing and distributing scholarly content. Let's examine this perspective:

The Value Added by Publishers

Content Development and Quality Control

Publishers play a crucial role in ensuring the quality and integrity of academic content:

1. Managing peer review processes to maintain scientific rigor

2. Providing editorial services to improve clarity and readability

3. Handling plagiarism checks and ethical oversight

These processes are time-consuming and require skilled professionals, contributing to the overall cost.

Technical Infrastructure

Publishers invest heavily in digital platforms and tools:

1. Developing and maintaining online submission systems

2. Creating searchable databases and archives

3. Implementing digital preservation strategies

These technological investments are essential for modern scholarly communication but come with significant costs.

Dissemination and Discoverability

Publishers enhance the visibility and accessibility of research:

1. Indexing articles in major databases

2. Implementing metadata standards for improved discoverability

3. Marketing and promoting content to relevant audiences

These efforts help ensure that valuable knowledge reaches its intended audience, but they require resources and expertise.

Balancing Costs and Access

While acknowledging the costs associated with publishing, it's important to consider:

Evolving Business Models

The academic publishing industry is exploring new approaches to balance costs and access:

1. Open access models where authors or institutions pay publication fees

2. Hybrid journals offering both subscription and open access options

3. Institutional agreements that combine subscription access with open access publishing

Technological Efficiencies

Advancements in technology are helping to streamline some publishing processes:

1. Automated formatting and typesetting tools

2. AI-assisted peer review management

3. Cloud-based collaboration platforms

These innovations may help reduce costs over time.

Public Funding and Subsidies

Recognizing the public value of research, some initiatives aim to offset publishing costs:

1. Government grants to support open access publishing

2. Institutional funds dedicated to covering article processing charges

3. Consortia agreements to negotiate better terms with publishers

Conclusion

The creation and dissemination of valuable knowledge does indeed involve significant costs, as highlighted by the comprehensive list of services provided by journal publishers. However, this reality needs to be balanced against the imperative of broad access to knowledge, especially for publicly funded research.The challenge lies in finding sustainable models that:

1. Fairly compensate the value added by publishers

2. Ensure the quality and integrity of scholarly communication

3. Maximize the accessibility and impact of research findings

As the academic publishing landscape continues to evolve, stakeholders must work together to develop innovative solutions that address both the costs of knowledge creation and the need for widespread dissemination. This may involve a combination of new business models, technological innovations, and policy interventions to create a more equitable and sustainable scholarly communication ecosystem.

Gemini’s answer:
Here are some key points from the article titled "Focusing on Value - 102 Things Journal Publishers Do (2018 Update)" by Kent Anderson. It argues that the creation and dissemination of valuable knowledge in scholarly journals requires a significant amount of effort and resources from publishers, even though the financial model might not always be straightforward.

• The article lists 102 activities that publishers perform, highlighting the complexity and value they add to the research ecosystem.  

• These activities range from initial tasks like audience identification and brand creation to final steps like search engine optimization and dissemination.

• The article emphasizes the importance of peer review, editorial oversight, and quality control measures undertaken by publishers.

• It acknowledges the challenges faced by publishers, such as maintaining financial viability, adapting to technological changes, and competing with alternative models for scholarly communication.

• Each activity is assigned a value, importance, and beneficiary rating. This helps demonstrate the impact publishers have on different stakeholders like researchers, authors, editors, institutions, and society as a whole.  

Overall, the article aims to provide a more nuanced perspective on the role of publishers in scholarly communication. It argues that despite the criticisms they sometimes face, publishers play a vital role in ensuring the quality, discoverability, and impact of research outputs.

Yes, the robust creation and dissemination of valuable knowledge can be quite costly. Here are some examples:

• Research Costs: Scientific research often requires significant investments in equipment, materials, personnel, and infrastructure. This includes laboratory setups, data collection tools, and specialized software.  

• Publication Costs: Publishing research findings in journals or books involves costs for editing, formatting, printing, and distribution. Even with the rise of open access publishing, there are often fees associated with making research freely available.  

• Data Storage and Management: The collection and storage of large datasets, particularly in fields like genomics and astrophysics, can be expensive. Maintaining data integrity and accessibility over time also requires ongoing resources.  

• Infrastructure Costs: Building and maintaining the digital infrastructure needed to access and share knowledge, such as libraries, databases, and online platforms, involves substantial costs.

• Human Capital: The creation of knowledge often relies on highly skilled researchers, scientists, and scholars. Investing in their education, training, and salaries is a significant cost.

While the value of knowledge is immeasurable, the costs associated with its creation and dissemination are real. Finding ways to balance these costs with the benefits of knowledge sharing is a complex challenge.

Asking for AI's perspective on Marc Andreessen's plea for free access to valuable knowledge. Grok: Innovation thrives not just on freedom but also on the structures that reward it.

PASCAL HETZSCHOLDT

·

3 NOV

Asking AI services: Please read Marc Andreessen’s post and explain to me whether you agree with him and why - similar to his plea for free access to valuable knowledge - access to the internet and the use of electronic devices, operating systems and critical software applications shouldn’t be free for citizens and consumers too, since those are required…

Read full story