Asking AI: did TV die?

Google Bard: These are just a few ideas for how to fill in the gap and make sure that important tasks and responsibilities are realized within online environments and (global) digital platforms

July 26, 2023

Question 1 of 5 for AI services: I was reading these Dutch language articles https://www.mediacourant.nl/2023/06/schokgolf-in-tv-land-na-slechtst-bekeken-avonden-ooit-alles-flopt/ and https://www.nu.nl/media/6273708/kijkcijfers-achter-slot-en-grendel-vanaf-augustus-zijn-ze-pas-na-zes-dagen-bekend.html and https://www.geenstijl.nl/5171707/lineaire-televisie-is-nu-echt-bijna-dood/ and it made me wonder: did TV die? Can you find any news articles or research that would corroborate my view?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:Used World NewsUsed ScholarAI

Here are some news articles and research papers that might support your view:

News Articles:

Research Papers:

Would you like to dive into any of these in more detail or save any of them for later reference?

Follow up question for ChatGPT-4: Yes just summarise for me what the main reasons have been that nobody is watching TV anymore

ChatGPT-4’s answer:Based on the news articles and research papers, here are some of the main reasons for the decline in television viewership:

  1. Shift in Content: There's a shift from local to national or global content, which may not resonate with local audiences. For instance, in Kuwait, the decline in viewership was attributed to a lack of government attention to the service, resulting in a mismatch of television content and national aspirations. Similarly, in the US, there's been a shift from local to national political coverage, which may not appeal to all viewers.

  2. Rise of Streaming Services: The rise of streaming services like Netflix, Amazon Prime, and others has led to a significant decline in traditional TV viewership. These platforms offer a wide variety of content that can be watched at any time, making them a more convenient option for many viewers.

  3. Change in Viewer Preferences: There's been a change in what viewers want to watch. For example, in Indonesia, the viewership of variety shows was found to have a negative relationship with political interest, meaning that as viewership of these shows increased, interest in politics decreased.

  4. Quality of Programming: The quality of programming has been a significant factor. Some viewers feel that the quality of shows has declined, leading them to seek out other forms of entertainment.

  5. Technological Advancements: The advent of new technologies has also played a role. With the rise of smartphones and tablets, people have more options for entertainment and may choose to consume content in ways other than traditional TV.

  6. Societal Changes: Changes in society and lifestyle also contribute to the decline. For example, the increase in work-from-home arrangements due to the pandemic has altered viewing habits, with people turning to streaming services or other forms of entertainment during their breaks.

  7. Political and Ideological Polarization: Some viewers may be turned off by the perceived ideological slant of certain channels or shows, leading them to seek out news and entertainment from sources that align more closely with their own views.

  8. Economic Factors: Economic factors can also play a role. For example, in times of economic downturn, people may choose to cut back on non-essential expenses like cable TV subscriptions.

These factors combined have led to a significant decline in traditional TV viewership. However, it's important to note that while traditional TV viewership is declining, people are still consuming a lot of video content - they're just doing it in different ways.

Google Bard’s answer to question 1:Sure, here are some news articles and research that corroborate the view that TV is dying:

  • "The Death of TV Is Coming Sooner Than You Think" (The New York Times, 2019)

  • "Streaming Is Killing Traditional TV" (CNBC, 2020)

  • "The Future of TV: How Streaming Is Changing the Way We Watch" (The Guardian, 2021)

These articles all discuss the decline of traditional TV viewership in favor of streaming services. According to a 2020 report by eMarketer, traditional TV viewing is expected to decline by 10% between 2020 and 2023. This decline is being driven by a number of factors, including the rise of streaming services, the increasing popularity of cord-cutting, and the aging of the TV audience.

While traditional TV may be dying, streaming services are thriving. In 2020, the global streaming market was worth $120 billion and is expected to reach $223 billion by 2025. The growth of streaming services is being driven by a number of factors, including the increasing availability of high-speed internet, the convenience of streaming, and the wide variety of content available.

So, has TV died? Not yet, but it is certainly on the decline. Streaming services are the future of TV, and they are only going to become more popular in the years to come.

Here are some additional thoughts on the topic:

  • The decline of traditional TV is not necessarily a bad thing. Streaming services offer a wider variety of content, more flexibility, and lower prices than traditional TV.

  • However, the decline of traditional TV does have some negative consequences. For example, it could lead to a decrease in local news coverage and a decline in the diversity of programming.

  • It is important to remember that the future of TV is not yet written. It is possible that traditional TV will find a way to adapt to the changing landscape and remain relevant.

Bing Chat’s answer to question 1:Hi, this is Bing. I’m glad you’re interested in the topic of TV viewership. I searched the web for some articles and research that might support your view that TV has died.

One article I found is from Deloitte Insights, titled “TV viewership decline: Television is about to dip below half of all UK video viewing” 1. It predicts that in the United Kingdom, 2022 will be the final year that traditional television from broadcasters, whether live, time-shifted, or on demand, collectively makes up more than 50% of video viewing on all screens. It also says that this trend is likely to foretell those in dozens of other markets with a similar composition of providers.

Another article is from The Drum, titled “26% of Brits say they won’t watch linear TV again… but that doesn’t mean they’re lost” 2. It reports a significant drop in weekly linear TV viewers from 79% to 69% over the fourth quarter as viewers increasingly vote with their remotes for streaming alternatives. It also says that less than half expect to be watching linear TV in five years.

A third article is from Exchange4Media, titled “Broadcast industry scrambles for answers as overall TV viewership declines” 3. It says that media experts attribute the decline in TV viewership to a combination of factors, including distribution-related issues and the changes in the media landscape. It also says that broadcasters are looking for ways to retain and attract viewers, such as creating original content, launching new channels, and investing in digital platforms.

These are just some of the sources I found that might corroborate your view. However, I also found some sources that might challenge your view or offer a different perspective. For example, some sources suggest that TV is not dying, but evolving or adapting to the changing consumer preferences and technologies. Some sources also point out the advantages of TV over other media, such as its reach, impact, and trustworthiness.

If you want to learn more about these sources or find more information on this topic, you can click on the links I provided or use my search tool to explore further. I hope this helps you with your inquiry. 😊

Question 2 of 5 for AI services: How should national broadcasters respond to this situation?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:National broadcasters are facing a challenging situation with the decline in traditional TV viewership. However, there are several strategies they can adopt to adapt to the changing landscape:

  1. Embrace Digital Platforms: Broadcasters should consider expanding their presence on digital platforms. This could include creating apps for streaming their content, making their programs available on demand, or even partnering with existing streaming services. They should also consider how they can leverage social media platforms to engage with their audience.

  2. Invest in Quality Content: Quality content is still king. Broadcasters should focus on producing high-quality, engaging content that resonates with their audience. This could include investing in original programming, partnering with talented creators, or acquiring popular shows from other sources.

  3. Focus on Local Content: While there's a trend towards global content, there's still a demand for local content. Broadcasters should consider how they can serve their local communities with relevant news, events, and stories.

  4. Engage with the Audience: Broadcasters should look for ways to engage with their audience beyond just broadcasting content. This could include interactive elements within shows, opportunities for audience participation, or using social media to create a dialogue with viewers.

  5. Leverage Data: With digital platforms, broadcasters have access to a wealth of data about their audience. They should leverage this data to understand what content resonates with their audience, when they're most likely to watch, and how they can better serve their viewers.

  6. Diversify Revenue Streams: With the decline in traditional advertising revenue, broadcasters should look for other ways to monetize their content. This could include subscription models, sponsored content, or even e-commerce opportunities.

  7. Collaborate and Partner: Broadcasters can consider strategic partnerships or collaborations to expand their reach and resources. This could include partnering with other media organizations, tech companies, or even educational institutions.

  8. Promote Media Literacy: In an era of misinformation and fake news, broadcasters have a role to play in promoting media literacy. They can produce content that helps viewers understand how to critically evaluate the information they consume.

  9. Adapt to Changing Viewing Habits: Broadcasters need to understand and adapt to changing viewing habits. For example, with the rise of binge-watching, they might consider releasing entire seasons of shows at once, rather than on a weekly schedule.

These strategies can help national broadcasters adapt to the changing media landscape and continue to serve their audiences effectively.

Google Bard’s answer:National broadcasters can respond to the decline in TV viewership in a number of ways, including:

  • Investing in streaming services. National broadcasters can create their own streaming services or partner with existing streaming services to offer their content. This will allow them to reach a wider audience and compete with the likes of Netflix and Hulu.

  • Focusing on local news coverage. As people increasingly turn to streaming services for entertainment, national broadcasters can focus on providing high-quality local news coverage. This will help them to stay relevant and attract viewers who are interested in local events.

  • Creating more diverse programming. National broadcasters can create more diverse programming that appeals to a wider range of viewers. This could include programming that is targeted at specific demographics, such as young adults or African Americans.

  • Partnering with other media companies. National broadcasters can partner with other media companies, such as newspapers or magazines, to create cross-platform content. This will allow them to reach a wider audience and increase engagement.

It is important to note that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to the decline in TV viewership. National broadcasters will need to experiment with different strategies to find what works best for them. However, by taking the steps outlined above, national broadcasters can position themselves for success in the future of TV.

Here are some additional thoughts on the topic:

  • It is important for national broadcasters to be creative and innovative in their approach to the decline in TV viewership. They need to find new ways to reach viewers and keep them engaged.

  • National broadcasters should not be afraid to experiment with new technologies and platforms. The future of TV is uncertain, and national broadcasters need to be prepared to adapt to change.

  • National broadcasters should focus on providing high-quality content that is relevant to their viewers. This is the best way to build a loyal audience and attract new viewers.

Bing Chat’s answer:That’s a good question. There is no definitive answer to how national broadcasters should respond to the situation of TV viewership decline, but I can share some of the suggestions and strategies that I found from various sources.

One suggestion is that national broadcasters should focus on their core strengths, such as producing high-quality, original, and distinctive content that appeals to a broad and diverse audience. This could help them differentiate themselves from the competition and maintain their relevance and value in the media landscape. For example, one article 1 says that public service broadcasters in the UK should “continue to invest in content that showcases the best of British culture and creativity, reflects the diversity of the nation, and informs, educates, and entertains the public”.

Another suggestion is that national broadcasters should embrace digital transformation and innovation, such as developing their own online platforms, offering more on-demand and personalized services, and leveraging data and analytics to understand and engage their audiences. This could help them adapt to the changing consumer preferences and technologies, and reach new and younger audiences. For example, one article 2 says that “broadcasters need to invest in digital capabilities to deliver a seamless cross-platform experience for viewers”.

A third suggestion is that national broadcasters should collaborate with other players in the industry, such as pay TV operators, streaming services, advertisers, regulators, and policymakers. This could help them create synergies, share resources, access new markets, and influence the regulatory environment. For example, one article 3 says that “broadcasters should seek partnerships with other media companies to create scale and leverage each other’s strengths”.

These are just some of the possible ways that national broadcasters could respond to the situation of TV viewership decline. Of course, each broadcaster would have to consider their own specific circumstances, challenges, and opportunities when deciding on their strategy. I hope this gives you some insights into this topic. 😊

Question 3 of 5 for AI Services: How should governments respond in case of subsidised national broadcasters?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:In the case of subsidized national broadcasters, governments have a role to play in ensuring these institutions can adapt to the changing media landscape. Here are some strategies governments could consider:

  1. Provide Adequate Funding: Subsidized broadcasters often rely on government funding to operate. Governments should ensure these broadcasters have the necessary resources to invest in new technologies, produce quality content, and attract talented staff.

  2. Promote Innovation: Governments can encourage innovation by providing grants or incentives for broadcasters to explore new technologies, formats, and business models. This could include funding for digital transformation projects, research into new ways of delivering content, or initiatives to promote audience engagement.

  3. Regulatory Flexibility: As the media landscape evolves, so too should the regulations that govern it. Governments should consider whether existing regulations are still fit for purpose and make any necessary adjustments to support the transition to digital platforms.

  4. Support Local Content: Governments can play a role in supporting the production of local content. This could include funding for local programming, incentives for broadcasters to invest in local content, or regulations that require a certain proportion of content to be locally produced.

  5. Promote Media Literacy: Governments can work with broadcasters to promote media literacy. This could include funding for educational programs, public awareness campaigns, or collaborations with schools and community groups.

  6. Ensure Access: In the transition to digital platforms, it's important to ensure all citizens have access to broadcast content. Governments can support this by investing in digital infrastructure, promoting digital inclusion initiatives, and ensuring broadcasters offer accessible content for people with disabilities.

  7. Protect Public Service Broadcasting: Governments should recognize the value of public service broadcasting and take steps to protect and preserve it. This could include measures to ensure editorial independence, protect against political interference, and promote transparency and accountability.

  8. Encourage Collaboration: Governments can encourage collaboration between public broadcasters and other sectors, such as education, technology, and community organizations. This could help broadcasters expand their reach, enhance their content, and better serve their audiences.

By adopting these strategies, governments can help subsidized national broadcasters navigate the challenges of the digital age and continue to provide a valuable service to their audiences.

Google Bard’s answer:Governments should respond to the decline of subsidized national broadcasters in a number of ways, including:

  • Reassessing the role of subsidized national broadcasters. Governments should consider whether subsidized national broadcasters are still necessary in the age of streaming services. If they are, governments should determine what role these broadcasters should play in the new media landscape.

  • Reviewing the funding of subsidized national broadcasters. Governments should review the amount of money that they are providing to subsidized national broadcasters. They should consider whether this funding is still necessary and whether it is being used effectively.

  • Allowing subsidized national broadcasters to compete with streaming services. Governments should allow subsidized national broadcasters to compete with streaming services on a level playing field. This could include removing regulations that restrict the ability of subsidized national broadcasters to offer their content online.

  • Supporting the development of new technologies and platforms. Governments should support the development of new technologies and platforms that can help subsidized national broadcasters reach a wider audience. This could include funding research and development, providing tax breaks, or creating regulatory frameworks that are favorable to new technologies.

It is important to note that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to the decline of subsidized national broadcasters. Governments will need to experiment with different approaches to find what works best for their country. However, by taking the steps outlined above, governments can help to ensure that subsidized national broadcasters can continue to play an important role in the media landscape.

Here are some additional thoughts on the topic:

  • It is important for governments to be mindful of the public interest when responding to the decline of subsidized national broadcasters. These broadcasters play an important role in providing news, information, and culture to the public, and governments should not abandon them without careful consideration.

  • Governments should also be mindful of the impact that the decline of subsidized national broadcasters will have on the media landscape. These broadcasters often provide a diversity of voices and perspectives that are not always found on commercial media platforms. The loss of these voices could have a negative impact on the quality of public discourse.

  • Ultimately, the future of subsidized national broadcasters will depend on the willingness of governments to support them. If governments are willing to invest in these broadcasters and allow them to compete with streaming services on a level playing field, then there is a good chance that they can continue to play an important role in the media landscape.

Bing Chat’s answer:That’s an interesting question. There is no consensus on how governments should respond to the situation of subsidised national broadcasters, but I can share some of the views and arguments that I found from various sources.

One view is that governments should support and protect subsidised national broadcasters, especially public service broadcasters (PSBs), as they provide valuable social and cultural benefits to the public, such as informing, educating, and entertaining the audience, reflecting the diversity and identity of the nation, and promoting democratic values and civic engagement. For example, one policy paper 1 says that “the government is committed to supporting PSBs as they continue to deliver for UK audiences”. Some of the ways that governments could support subsidised national broadcasters include ensuring adequate and stable funding, safeguarding their editorial independence and impartiality, and creating a favourable regulatory environment.

Another view is that governments should reform and modernise subsidised national broadcasters, especially PSBs, as they face increasing challenges and competition from the changing media landscape, such as the rise of online platforms, streaming services, and global players. For example, one article 2 says that “broadcasting reforms to create new golden age of British TV and help nation’s public service broadcasters thrive”. Some of the ways that governments could reform subsidised national broadcasters include updating their remit and obligations, giving them more flexibility and innovation, and pursuing a change of ownership or governance.

A third view is that governments should reduce or eliminate subsidised national broadcasters, especially PSBs, as they distort the market and create unfair competition for other media outlets, such as commercial broadcasters, pay TV operators, and independent producers. For example, one article 3 says that “the BBC faces major challenges from the government to its independence”. Some of the ways that governments could reduce or eliminate subsidised national broadcasters include cutting or abolishing their funding, privatising or selling them off, and deregulating or abolishing their special status.

These are just some of the possible ways that governments could respond to the situation of subsidised national broadcasters. Of course, each government would have to consider their own political, economic, and social context when deciding on their policy. I hope this gives you some insights into this topic. 😊

Question 4 of 5 for AI Services: which current services national broadcasters provide will be hard to replace in online environments?

ChatGPT-4’s answer:While many services provided by national broadcasters can be transitioned to online environments, there are a few that may be challenging to replicate fully:

  1. Emergency Broadcasting: National broadcasters often play a crucial role in disseminating information during emergencies, such as natural disasters or public health crises. While online platforms can also provide this service, not all individuals have reliable internet access, especially in remote or rural areas. Broadcast television and radio can often reach these areas more effectively.

  2. Public Service Announcements: Similar to emergency broadcasting, public service announcements (PSAs) are often disseminated through national broadcasters. While these can also be shared online, the broad reach of broadcast media ensures they are seen by a wide audience, including those who may not use the internet regularly.

  3. Local Content: National broadcasters often provide local content that caters to specific regions or communities. While online platforms can also deliver local content, the infrastructure and resources needed to produce such content at scale can be challenging for online-only platforms.

  4. Live Events: National broadcasters often have the rights to broadcast live events, such as sports, concerts, or national ceremonies. While some of these events are also streamed online, broadcast television often provides a more reliable and higher-quality viewing experience, especially for viewers with slow or unreliable internet connections.

  5. Educational Programming: Many national broadcasters provide educational programming, often in partnership with educational institutions. While online learning platforms are growing, broadcast media can reach a wider audience, including those without reliable internet access.

  6. News and Current Affairs: While online news consumption is growing, broadcast news programs often have a higher level of trust among viewers. Maintaining this level of trust in an online environment, where misinformation can spread easily, can be challenging.

  7. Accessibility Services: National broadcasters often provide services for viewers with disabilities, such as closed captioning, audio descriptions, or sign language interpretation. While these services can also be provided online, ensuring they are available and of high quality on all online platforms can be challenging.

  8. Cultural Preservation: National broadcasters often play a role in preserving and promoting national culture and language. This includes broadcasting in indigenous or minority languages, and producing programs that reflect the nation's cultural heritage. While such content can also be shared online, the broad reach of national broadcasters ensures it can be accessed by a wide audience.

These services are all valuable, and while they can be challenging to replicate online, with careful planning and investment, it is possible to transition many of them to digital platforms.

Google Bard’s answer:Here are some of the current services that national broadcasters provide that will be hard to replace in online environments:

  • Local news coverage: National broadcasters often provide high-quality local news coverage that is not always available on commercial media platforms. This coverage is important for keeping citizens informed about local events and issues.

  • Diversity of programming: National broadcasters often produce a wide variety of programming that appeals to a diverse audience. This programming includes news, documentaries, dramas, comedies, and children's programming. It is difficult for commercial media platforms to produce such a wide variety of programming due to the high cost involved.

  • Public service programming: National broadcasters often produce programming that is intended to serve the public interest, such as educational programming and programming about social issues. This programming is not always profitable for commercial media platforms.

  • Reaching a wide audience: National broadcasters often have the ability to reach a wide audience through their television and radio channels. This is difficult for commercial media platforms to do, as they often rely on subscriptions or advertising revenue.

While some of these services may be available on online platforms, they are often not as comprehensive or reliable as the services provided by national broadcasters. For example, online news platforms often rely on freelancers and citizen journalists, which can lead to a lack of accuracy and professionalism. Additionally, online platforms often focus on sensationalized content in order to attract viewers, which can lead to a decline in the quality of journalism.

As a result, national broadcasters are likely to continue to play an important role in the media landscape, even in the age of online streaming.

Bing Chat’s answer:Some of the services that national broadcasters provide that might be hard to replace in online environments are:

  • Universal access and reach: National broadcasters are able to reach all parts of the country and all segments of the population, regardless of their location, income, or access to technology. They also offer a range of free-to-air channels and radio stations that are widely available and easy to find. Online platforms, on the other hand, may require subscription fees, internet connection, and compatible devices, which could exclude some potential viewers and listeners. For example, one article 1 says that “public service broadcasting is a vital part of our national life. It provides universal access to high-quality and impartial content that entertains, informs and educates”.

  • Public service remit and values: National broadcasters have a duty to serve the public interest and uphold certain standards and values, such as impartiality, accuracy, diversity, quality, and innovation. They also have a responsibility to provide content that reflects the culture, identity, and diversity of the nation, as well as to inform, educate, and entertain the audience. Online platforms, on the other hand, may not have the same obligations or commitments, and may prioritise commercial interests or user preferences over public service goals. For example, one article 2 says that “public service broadcasters play a vital role in our democracy, our creative industries and our daily lives. They produce brilliant content that reflects our culture and values”.

  • Trust and credibility: National broadcasters are generally trusted and respected by the public as reliable and authoritative sources of information and entertainment. They also have a reputation for producing high-quality and original content that is well-researched and verified. Online platforms, on the other hand, may face challenges in ensuring the quality, accuracy, and authenticity of their content, as well as in combating misinformation and disinformation. For example, one article 3 says that “broadcasters are among the most trusted sources of news in the UK”.

Question 5 of 5 for AI Services: Put your thinking cap on and please list 5 innovative ways of filling in the gap and making sure that these important tasks and responsibilities will somehow be realised within online environments and (global) digital platforms as well

ChatGPT-4’s answer:Certainly, here are five [sic] innovative ways to ensure these important tasks and responsibilities are realized within online environments and global digital platforms:

  1. Hybrid Broadcasting Systems: Develop hybrid broadcasting systems that combine traditional broadcasting with internet-based services. This could allow for the simultaneous broadcast of emergency information or public service announcements across multiple platforms, ensuring that they reach as wide an audience as possible. This could also include features like push notifications for urgent updates.

  2. Localized Digital Platforms: Create localized versions of digital platforms that cater specifically to the needs and interests of local communities. These platforms could feature local news, events, and other relevant content. They could also provide a platform for local advertisers, helping to support the local economy.

  3. Partnerships with Online Education Platforms: National broadcasters could partner with online education platforms to deliver educational content. This could involve creating educational videos, interactive lessons, or even full online courses. These could be made freely available to ensure they are accessible to all.

  4. Live Streaming with Enhanced Interactivity: For live events, broadcasters could leverage the interactivity of online platforms to enhance the viewer experience. This could include features like live chats, viewer polls, or interactive graphics. They could also explore innovative formats like virtual or augmented reality broadcasts.

  5. AI-Powered Accessibility Features: Use artificial intelligence to improve accessibility features on digital platforms. This could include AI-powered closed captioning, audio descriptions, or sign language interpretation. These features could be made available on all content, ensuring that it is accessible to all viewers.

  6. Digital Archives for Cultural Preservation: Create digital archives that preserve and promote national culture and language. These archives could include historical broadcasts, documentaries, and other culturally significant content. They could be made freely available to the public, serving as a valuable resource for education and cultural preservation.

  7. Collaborative Fact-Checking: To maintain trust in news and current affairs content, broadcasters could collaborate with fact-checking organizations to verify the information they share online. They could also develop interactive features that allow viewers to explore the sources of information and understand the fact-checking process.

  8. Community Engagement Platforms: Develop online platforms that allow for community engagement and participation. This could include features like community forums, user-generated content, or interactive town hall meetings. This could help to foster a sense of community and engagement among viewers.

These are just a few ideas. The key is to leverage the strengths of digital platforms - including their interactivity, accessibility, and potential for personalization - while also preserving the essential functions and values of traditional broadcasting.

Google Bard’s answer:Here are 5 innovative ways of filling in the gap and making sure that these important tasks and responsibilities will somehow be realised within online environments and (global) digital platforms as well:

  1. Create a global digital platform that provides access to high-quality local news coverage from around the world. This platform could be funded by governments or by a consortium of media companies. It would provide a way for citizens to stay informed about local events and issues, regardless of where they live.

  2. Develop new technologies that can help to identify and filter out misinformation and disinformation. This could include using artificial intelligence to analyze text and identify patterns that are associated with false information.

  3. Create a code of ethics for online platforms that outlines their responsibilities to their users. This code could include provisions for ensuring that users are treated fairly, that their privacy is protected, and that they are not exposed to harmful content.

  4. Promote digital literacy education so that people are better equipped to understand and use online platforms safely and responsibly. This could include teaching people how to evaluate information, how to spot misinformation, and how to protect their privacy online.

  5. Support the development of independent media organizations that are committed to high-quality journalism. These organizations can play an important role in holding governments and other powerful institutions accountable.

These are just a few ideas for how to fill in the gap and make sure that important tasks and responsibilities are realized within online environments and (global) digital platforms. The future of the media is uncertain, but by taking these steps, we can help to ensure that it remains a force for good in society.

Bing Chat’s answer:Based on the results of my web search, here are some possible ways of filling in the gap and making sure that the important tasks and responsibilities of public service media are realised within online environments and (global) digital platforms:

  • Creating a public service media fund: This could be a way of supporting the production and distribution of public service content across different online platforms, especially those that are not owned or controlled by public service broadcasters. The fund could be financed by a levy on online platforms or other sources, and could be administered by an independent body that would allocate the resources based on public service criteria. For example, one article 1 says that “Ofcom is proposing a new Public Service Media Fund to support a range of content from different providers, including news, drama, comedy, documentaries and children’s programming”.

  • Establishing a public service media network: This could be a way of creating a collaborative and cooperative platform that would bring together different public service media organisations and stakeholders, such as broadcasters, producers, regulators, policymakers, and civil society. The network could facilitate the sharing of best practices, resources, content, and data, as well as the development of common standards, policies, and strategies. For example, one article 2 says that “the EBU is working to create a Public Service Media Network that will enable its members to share content and services across borders”.

  • Developing a public service media identity: This could be a way of enhancing the visibility and recognition of public service media content and values in the online environment, where it might otherwise be lost or diluted among the plethora of other offerings. The identity could be expressed through a common brand, logo, label, or certification that would signal to the audience the quality, reliability, and diversity of public service media content. For example, one article 3 says that “Channel 4 is launching a new digital-first brand identity to showcase its public service remit”.

  • Engaging with online communities: This could be a way of fostering a closer and more interactive relationship with the audience, especially the younger and more diverse segments that might not be reached by traditional public service media channels. The engagement could involve creating and participating in online forums, groups, chats, or events that would allow the audience to provide feedback, suggestions, or contributions to public service media content. For example, one article says that “BBC News Labs is experimenting with new ways to engage with online communities around news topics”.

  • Innovating with online formats: This could be a way of adapting and diversifying the public service media content to suit the preferences and expectations of the online audience, especially in terms of length, style, tone, and interactivity. The innovation could involve creating new formats or genres that would appeal to different niches or interests, such as podcasts, web series, documentaries, games, or quizzes. For example, one article says that “France Télévisions is launching Slash TV, a new online-only channel aimed at young adults”.

Photo by Possessed Photography on Unsplash