An Analysis of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE): Personnel, Alleged Unlawful Actions, and Potential Legal Consequences

by Gemini Advanced, Deep Research with 2.5 Pro

I. Introduction

Purpose: This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an initiative established within the Executive Office of the President during the second administration of President Donald Trump. Launched via executive order in early 2025 [1], DOGE, led by billionaire Elon Musk, was ostensibly created to identify and eliminate "waste, fraud, and abuse" within the federal government, thereby reducing federal spending and bureaucracy [1]. It is crucial to note that despite its name, DOGE does not function as a cabinet-level department but rather as a temporary, cross-agency entity operating with significant, albeit contested, authority [1].

Context: The initiative emerged from discussions between President Trump and Elon Musk during the 2024 campaign. From its inception, DOGE has been marked by significant controversy, operational disruption within federal agencies, accusations of constitutional overreach, disregard for legal and ethical norms, and numerous legal challenges questioning its authority, methods, and adherence to constitutional and statutory requirements [1, 2, 3]. Critics, including Senator Murphy, have expressed grave concerns, suggesting the administration overseeing DOGE could potentially be characterized as "the most corrupt" due to perceptions that DOGE operates outside established constitutional guardrails.

Scope: This analysis focuses specifically on the personnel associated with DOGE, particularly Elon Musk and his key associates; details specific allegations of unlawful or unconstitutional actions attributed to the initiative and its members, and assesses the potential legal consequences for the individuals involved should these allegations be substantiated. The analysis relies on publicly available information, and previously gathered research materials.

II. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE): Structure and Key Personnel

A. Establishment, Structure, and Legal Status

DOGE's foundation rests on an executive order issued in early 2025. This order initiated several significant structural changes within the executive branch, notably renaming the established United States Digital Service (USDS) to the "United States DOGE Service" [1, 5]. Concurrently, the order established the "U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization" (USDSTO), a body tasked with implementing the DOGE agenda, explicitly designated as temporary with an operational mandate set to expire on July 4, 2026 [1, 5]. Furthermore, the executive order mandated the formation of "DOGE teams" within various federal agencies. These teams typically comprised a leader, an engineer, an HR specialist, and an attorney, designed to embed the initiative's personnel directly into agency operations .

The organizational placement and legal status of DOGE remain subjects of considerable ambiguity and dispute. While situated within the Executive Office of the President (EOP), it is characterized as a temporary, cross-departmental entity [1]. Amy Gleason, designated as the Acting Administrator, described DOGE as having three main components: the renamed U.S. DOGE Service, the embedded agency DOGE teams, and the overarching DOGE policy agenda, which is advised by Elon Musk. This complex, multi-layered, and explicitly temporary structure, coupled with its contested legal standing—DOGE has argued it does not constitute a traditional "agency" under administrative law, a position contradicted by at least one federal court ruling —and reported efforts to limit public disclosure through mechanisms like resisting Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, significantly complicates traditional mechanisms of oversight and accountability [1, 2, 6]. Legal analysts and critics argue that this deliberately ambiguous structure may facilitate executive overreach, potentially circumventing Congress's constitutional authority to establish formal departments and control federal appropriations.

B. Leadership and Key Figures

The personnel leading and operating DOGE represent a distinct blend of individuals: long-time associates of Elon Musk, figures drawn from the technology industry (some notably young), veterans of the first Trump administration, and others recruited specifically for this initiative.

1. Elon Musk:

• Role & Status: Officially designated as a "Special Government Employee" (SGE) holding the title of Senior Advisor to the President on the DOGE agenda [1, 6, 7, 10]. However, he is widely perceived, and has been characterized by a federal judge, as the de facto leader of the initiative [1]. His role involves advising the President directly on DOGE's policy direction and implementation [1].

• Business Ties & Conflicts: Musk concurrently serves as CEO or owner of several major corporations, including Tesla, SpaceX, X (formerly Twitter), The Boring Company, Neuralink, and xAI [7, 11]. These extensive private sector roles create significant potential conflicts of interest under federal ethics law, specifically 18 U.S.C. § 208, which prohibits executive branch employees from participating personally and substantially in government matters affecting their financial interests. DOGE's mandate to interact with numerous federal agencies—such as the Department of Transportation (DOT), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), and various environmental agencies—directly overlaps with the regulatory and contractual interests of his companies [6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 17]. His status as an unpaid SGE exempts him from the public financial disclosure requirements typically applied to senior officials, further obscuring potential conflicts. Public information highlights the inherent ethical conflict in simultaneously holding influential public advisory roles and leading major private enterprises, suggesting that DOGE's activities might be directed towards agencies whose regulatory actions impact his businesses. Further complicating the ethical landscape is the reported discovery of shared Cloudflare IDs linking official DOGE websites with Musk-related private websites, suggesting a potential commingling of technical infrastructure that blurs the lines between public service and private enterprise.

• Influence: Musk wields considerable influence over federal operations without having undergone Senate confirmation, a situation that raises serious questions under the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which generally requires principal officers exercising significant authority to be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate [1, 2, 17, 31].

  2. Steve Davis:

• Role: Frequently described as Musk's "top lieutenant" within DOGE, Davis functions as the de facto operational leader, managing the initiative's day-to-day activities [1, 11, 12, 21, 22, 23]. He has been directly implicated in controversial actions, including authoring the aggressive "Fork in the Road" email demanding extensive data access from the Social Security Administration (SSA) .

• Background & Ties: Davis has a long history with Musk, dating back to SpaceX in 2003 . He serves as President of The Boring Company and played a key role in the drastic cost-cutting measures implemented at Twitter/X following Musk's acquisition [11, 12, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]. He is known for an approach characterized by extreme frugality, sometimes described as having a "chemotherapy" effect on organizations . Davis also holds advisory roles, such as with the Atlas Society, and has involvement with a pro-Trump Super PAC . His wife, Nicole Hollander, also an employee at X, is listed among DOGE personnel, further intertwining Musk's corporate network with the government initiative [11, 12].

  3. Amy Gleason:

• Role: Officially appointed as the Acting Administrator of the U.S. DOGE Service, Gleason's appointment occurred amidst legal challenges questioning the constitutionality of Musk's leadership role [1, 2, 8, 13, 29, 30, 31, 32]. However, multiple reports and analyses suggest that her authority may be largely nominal, potentially positioning her as a figurehead or a legal maneuver intended to shield the initiative from Appointments Clause challenges, while the substantive operational control remains with Davis and Musk [1, 2, 12, 13, 22].

• Background: Gleason possesses a background in healthcare technology, having co-founded CareSync, and previously served within the USDS from 2018 to 2021 [8, 29, 31]. She has also worked at firms associated with Brad Smith, potentially linking her to established figures within the tech policy sphere [8].

  4. Other Key Personnel:

• The appendix and previous research identify numerous other individuals involved in DOGE, revealing a pattern of staffing that heavily favors individuals with deep ties to Musk's corporate ecosystem and the broader tech industry.

• Inner Circle/Senior Figures: This group includes individuals placed in significant advisory or operational roles, often within critical government agencies like the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the Social Security Administration (SSA).

• Brian Bjelde: Serving as a Senior Advisor at OPM, Bjelde is a 21-year veteran of SpaceX (reportedly employee #14) and its former VP of People Operations. His presence suggests a direct import of SpaceX's human resources philosophy and practices into the federal government's central personnel agency.

• Amanda Scales: Appointed Chief of Staff at OPM, Scales previously worked in talent acquisition at Musk's xAI and held human capital roles at Uber. This reinforces the pattern of personnel from Musk's network and the tech sector assuming key positions influencing federal workforce management.

• Jehn Balajadia: Identified as a long-time assistant to Musk and an operations coordinator at The Boring Company, Balajadia's involvement points to the integration of individuals with direct personal loyalty to Musk within DOGE's operational structure.

• Riccardo Biasini: Serving as a Senior Advisor to the OPM Director, Biasini is a former Tesla engineer who also worked at Comma.ai and served as a director at The Boring Company. This further illustrates the embedding of personnel from Musk's companies into influential advisory positions.

• Michael Russo: Appointed Chief Information Officer at the SSA, Russo has prior experience as CTO at Shift4 and as a senior director at Oracle. His placement in this critical IT role at a major agency like SSA is significant, particularly in light of reported aggressive demands for SSA data access by DOGE personnel [1, 11, 22, 35].

• Christopher Stanley: Holding an unspecified role at the White House, Stanley is concurrently the Head of Security Engineering at X, a former principal security engineer at SpaceX, and CISO at X Payments. This overlap raises profound concerns regarding potential conflicts of interest and data security, given his simultaneous responsibilities for securing Musk's private enterprises while potentially having access to sensitive government systems and information.

• Branden Spikes: Identified as a former DOGE Operative, Spikes also served as Head of IT at X and was an early employee at both SpaceX and PayPal. His involvement, even if temporary, underscores the recurring pattern of drawing personnel from Musk's tech ventures.

• "Worker Bees" / Operatives: A notable characteristic of DOGE staffing is the deployment of numerous, often very young, individuals with backgrounds primarily in technology but frequently possessing limited experience in government operations or public administration. These operatives have been placed across various federal agencies.

• Akash Bobba: Designated as an Expert at OPM, Bobba is reportedly a UC Berkeley student with internship experience at Meta, Palantir, and Bridgewater [1, 11, 35]. He was allegedly granted extensive access to sensitive SSA data through highly unconventional means ("over the phone, contrary to standard practice") [1, 11, 35]. This incident raises serious questions regarding personnel vetting, adherence to security protocols, and the appropriateness of granting vast data access to junior personnel while bypassing established procedures.

• Edward Coristine: Serving as an SGE at the reported age of 19, Coristine is a former Neuralink intern [1]. He allegedly accessed systems at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) despite lacking apparent security credentials or clearances [1]. This represents an extreme example of potential security vulnerabilities and an apparent disregard for necessary qualifications in sensitive national security contexts.

• Marko Elez: An SGE assigned to the U.S. Treasury, Elez was reportedly granted administrative privileges to critical payment systems before resigning following the discovery of racist online posts [27, 48, 49]. This case highlights potential deficiencies in vetting processes, the risks posed to essential financial infrastructure, and the associated reputational damage to the initiative.

• Luke Farritor: A Senior Advisor within DOGE at age 23, Farritor, a former SpaceX intern, reportedly worked across multiple agencies including the State Department, USAID, and the Department of Energy (DOE) [1]. His deployment exemplifies the placement of young operatives with broad access across diverse government functions.

• Gavin Kliger: Serving as a Special Advisor to the OPM Director, Kliger also had affiliations with USAID and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), alongside a background at Databricks and an internship at Twitter [1]. His presence further underscores the infusion of tech sector personnel into key regulatory and administrative agencies.

• Ethan Shaotran: Identified as a DOGE Staffer at age 22, Shaotran, reportedly a Harvard student using a General Services Administration (GSA) email address, requested access to a decade's worth of GSA data. This illustrates the scale and potentially excessive nature of data demands being made by relatively junior personnel associated with the initiative.

• Riley Sennott: Identified through a public Google Calendar associated with NASA, Sennott has reported connections to Palantir. This suggests DOGE's potential reach extends even into agencies like NASA and highlights links to major data analytics contractors like Palantir.

• Other Operatives: Public information lists numerous other operatives placed across the government, including Scott Coulter (SSA), Gautier 'Cole' Killian (EPA), Tom Krause (Treasury), Jeremy Lewin (GSA), Aram Moghaddassi (Labor/Treasury), Nikhil Rajpal (NOAA), Kyle Schutt (FEMA), Thomas Shedd (GSA), Jordan Wick (EOP), and Christopher Young (CFPB), demonstrating the breadth of DOGE's penetration into federal agencies.

• Advisors, Recruiters, and Former Members:

• Unofficial Advisors: Marc Andreessen, co-founder of the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, has been reported as serving DOGE in an informal capacity, described humorously as an "unpaid intern". This signifies high-level support and involvement from influential figures within the tech and venture capital community.

• Recruiters: Individuals identified as involved in recruiting for DOGE include George Cooper, Vinay Hiremath, Anthony Jancso, and Michael Kratsios. Their professional backgrounds connect them to prominent tech firms and investment entities like Palantir, Loom, Accelerate SF, Scale AI, and Thiel Capital, as well as to personnel involved in President Trump's first term (Kratsios served as U.S. CTO). This highlights the specific network—encompassing tech, venture capital, the Thiel/Palantir ecosystem, and prior Trump administration loyalists—leveraged to staff the initiative.

• Spokesperson/Advisor: Katie Miller, who served in various communications roles during the first Trump administration and is married to former senior advisor Stephen Miller, acts as a DOGE Advisor and Spokesperson. Her involvement links DOGE's public messaging directly to established figures from the previous administration.

• Former Co-Chair: Vivek Ramaswamy was initially announced as a co-chair of the initiative but stepped down relatively early in the process. He cited "philosophical differences" with Elon Musk and potential conflicts arising from his gubernatorial campaign in Ohio as reasons for his departure [36-47]. This early exit may suggest internal friction or fundamental disagreements regarding DOGE's direction, methods, or objectives, even among its initial high-profile proponents.

Continue reading here: https://p4sc4l.substack.com/p/an-analysis-of-the-department-of