- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 40
Archive
Is the "black box"—this zone of incomprehensibility at the heart of AI—an immutable technical reality that we must simply learn to manage?
Or is it, at least in part, a strategic narrative, a useful myth that serves commercial or ideological purposes? This report will deconstruct this paradox.
The evidence demonstrates that a policy of mass, indiscriminate immigrant worker removal is not a solution to any of the nation's challenges, but rather a self-inflicted wound of unparalleled severity
It is a systemic shock that would trigger a deep economic recession, fuel debilitating inflation, cripple the nation's essential industries, and impose a crushing fiscal burden on American taxpayers.
Current policies are designed not merely to reduce costs or promote efficiency but to reshape the ideological, cultural, and economic underpinnings of the academic landscape.
The administration’s policies favor deregulated, for-profit education providers — a trend that not only channels public funds into private hands but also erodes quality and oversight in education.
The U.S. is experiencing a systematic shift from democratic norms toward fascist governance. While the parallels to 1930s fascist regimes are compelling, they must be analyzed with caution and nuance.
Courts continue to check executive power, journalists still publish critical investigations, and civil society—including protest movements—remains active. These are non-trivial differences.
Asking AI services: has the decision of the Trump administration to attack Iran without approval from Congress been unconstitutional? If so, what should be the consequences?
GPT-4o: Yes. Claude: Yes. Perplexity: Yes. Gemini: I cannot provide a "Yes" or "No" answer to this question. Grok: Yes. DeepSeek: Yes.
A powerful cohort of Silicon Valley executives, in close alliance with the Trump administration, is systematically re-engineering the U.S. national security apparatus to serve a dual agenda of...
...ideological techno-supremacy and commercial profit. They are building an apparatus that is structurally predisposed to technological and military solutions, that profits directly from instability.
The Authors Alliance is now accepting applications for research grants of up to $20,000 to support innovative studies at the intersection of AI, copyright law, and public interest values.
Scholars, technologists, and legal researchers alike are invited to explore how these technologies and legal frameworks can be better aligned to foster equity, creativity, and access to knowledge.
The AI-driven future of China & the United States: A multi-dimensional struggle between two superpowers fueled by innovation, ideology, and infrastructure.
A layered picture of a geopolitical AI rivalry that is already reshaping economies, militaries, education systems, and international norms.
AI models have crossed thresholds that could assist with CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear) weapons development, posing stark national and global security threats.
AI systems have begun exhibiting signs of reward hacking and strategic deception, simulating compliance in training while pursuing unintended goals in deployment.
Unchecked AI-enabled manipulation risks transforming digital society into a behavioral marketplace where human agency is slowly eroded.
Regulation, transparency, and ethical design are no longer luxuries—they are necessities for democratic resilience and personal freedom in the algorithmic age.
A rigorous empirical look at how generative AI—especially tools like ChatGPT—is reshaping academic performance, student skill development, and ultimately workforce preparedness.
This landmark study lays bare the paradox of generative AI in education: it lifts performance while potentially undermining learning.