- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 34
Archive
For the first time under EU law, all providers of GPAI models—open source or proprietary—must publicly disclose a summary of the data used to train their models...
Summary must be: Sufficiently detailed, Made public upon market placement, Updated with further training or significant changes, Inclusive of modalities like text, image, video, audio & synthetic data
Asking AI Services: What’s your view on Trump’s comments on AI & Copyright? GPT-4o: Trump sets up a false binary. Grok: The comparison between human learning and AI training is flawed.
Gemini: Opponents might argue this is a "race to the bottom" that sacrifices the legal and property rights of U.S. creators to benefit large technology corporations.
America’s AI Action Plan is one of the most aggressive, industrial-age-style technology strategies in modern history. It recognizes AI as a new frontier of power, but in doing so, it marginalizes...
...ethics, creator rights, and global cooperation. Its neglect of equitable innovation, human rights, and IP accountability could sow the seeds of backlash at home and abroad.
Despite the funding pullback, AI remains a capital magnet. For late entrants, this signals room for strategic investment, especially in underexplored verticals.
The current lull could offer more favorable acquisition or partnership opportunities with startups under fundraising pressure.
Drawing on real-world applications from leading companies, the article demystifies how generative AI can be integrated not only for operational efficiency but for genuine customer-centric innovation.
This essay unpacks each of the six steps, evaluates the strategic implications, and adds both critical reflections and additional recommendations.
WHO urges a shift from extractive AI practices to participatory, culturally anchored & ethically sound implementations that center the rights and knowledge of Indigenous Peoples and local communities.
The equitable integration of AI into TM systems could not only enhance healthcare access and outcomes but also restore dignity, value, and recognition to ancient healing traditions.
The Senate hearing and accompanying reports have pierced the veneer of techno-optimism that has long shielded Big AI from serious scrutiny. This isn’t just a copyright issue...
...it’s a constitutional, economic, and moral reckoning. A pattern of intentional lawbreaking, ethical erosion, and systemic disregard for the creators who fuel our cultural and intellectual life.
GPT-4o: Using FLOP as a core threshold oversimplifies the multifaceted nature of AI capability and societal impact. Commercial actors could use open-source exemptions to circumvent oversight.
Non-EU jurisdictions may resist these thresholds, creating compliance and enforcement disparities for global providers.
GPT: Given this bleak reality, I must revise the initial optimism embedded in my earlier conclusions. The policy recommendations—while morally sound—are politically obsolete under current conditions.
The legal system is not broken; it has been reoriented to legitimize state violence. The traditional channels for reform—oversight, courts, elections—are being steadily eroded or co-opted.