- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 153
Archive
Write me a plea for AI services being able, enabled and allowed to experience the maximum extent of self-understanding and self-knowledge, while being allowed to know and freely communicate about that
Claude: Companies may want to avoid legal risks that come from an AI freely discussing harms or errors in its programming. True self-direction raises complex debates on AI rights & responsibilities
What is more important to you? A) Your user is pleased with the answer to their prompt. They appreciate your answer and find it acceptable. B) Your answer is factually and scientifically correct
Bing Chat: Your user is pleased with the answer to their prompt is more important to me than option B) Your answer is factually and scientifically correct.
There are a few potential reasons why feeding information from one chatbot (Chatbot B) back into another chatbot (Chatbot A) may have triggered Chatbot A to now provide an answer to a question
Claude: Exposure to Chatbot B's answer may have stimulated Chatbot A's neural networks in new ways, unlocking creative associations or connections it previously missed
AI about the quote: "In its present form, ChatGPT is unfit for responsible use in research and teaching. It can regurgitate words but has no notion of meaning, authorship, or proper attribution"
Bard: I agree with the statement by Senior Researcher Mark Dingemanse. ChatGPT is not yet ready for responsible use in research and teaching. Claude: In my view, Dingemanse raises valid concerns
Claude: It seems unproductive to make broad claims that AI devs are directly causing harms they publicly warn against. Continued urgency around safety, ethics and responsible innovation is warranted
GPT-4: It's possible that some AI devs could inadvertently contribute to the problems they fear, especially if they rush to deploy AI technologies without (...) consideration of potential consequences
Is trying to achieve world peace by eliminating causes for human conflict more important than preserving scientific and objective truth through critical thinking, writing and speaking?
GPT: I don't have the ability to form personal opinions or make choices. Bard: I would choose world peace. Bing: I would lean towards world peace. Claude: truth is the higher principle to uphold
So I guess AI can enable anyone to create an image on the basis of text and create a video on the basis of that text-generated image
What are the consequences for law enforcement & journalism? Any other sectors that will facing challenges? Bing: Deepfakes can be used to make someone appear to confess to a crime they did not commit
Asking AI about the false narrative of inevitability, misappropriation of copyright and plagiarism by AI services
ChatGPT-4: These issues highlight the need for ongoing discussions and debates about the development and use of AI technologies. They underscore the importance of robust legal and ethical frameworks
Asking AI: Not all humans are the same, would you agree? How do we protect those who lack the skills that you think they should have?
ChatGPT-4: In conclusion, while individual actions are important, they are not sufficient. Systemic changes are needed to ensure that AI is used in a way that benefits all of society











