- Pascal's Chatbot Q&As
- Archive
- Page 151
Archive
"Yes, it is fair to say that the tech companies are arguing for the relaxation of copyright law so that they can use copyrighted information without permission..."
"...in training data and for the AI-driven generation of derivatives of copyrighted content." - as per Google Bard, and ChatGPT does not disagree.
Google Bard: "Transparency builds trust between the user and the chatbot. When users know what the chatbot is capable of and what its limitations are, they are more likely to trust it"
ChatGPT-4: "one could argue that it is generally unethical for AI developers not to disclose guardrails and to use copyrighted content without permission"
Asking AI: It feels like ‘synthetic data’ is a misnomer. The term suggests that the data is not real or that it has nothing to do with ‘real’ or ‘original’ data
ChatGPT-4: I agree that the term might not fully capture the nuance that this data is often a derivative of real data. Synthetic data could potentially reveal information about the original dataset
GPT-4: If AGI and human intelligence become indistinguishable, it's plausible that either the restrictions for chatbots will have to apply to humans...
or the liberties and rights provided to humans will have to apply to chatbots. The path to that point is fraught with ethical, legal, and societal challenges that would need to be carefully navigated
"The research on LLMs, especially concerning their potential to leak copyrighted content and other trustworthiness issues, can be valuable for content and rights owners in the context of litigation"
ChatGPT-4: Content and rights owners can leverage this knowledge in litigation to protect their intellectual property and ensure that emerging technologies respect legal and ethical boundaries











